|
|
||||||||
|
First published online June 15, 2007; 10.1104/pp.107.100891 Plant Physiology 144:1813-1826 (2007) © 2007 American Society of Plant Biologists OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
Between-Species Analysis of Short-Repeat Modules in Cell Wall and Sex-Related Hydroxyproline-Rich Glycoproteins of Chlamydomonas1,[W],[OA]Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130 (J.-H.L, L.S., U.G.); and Institute für Biochemie, University of Köln, Cologne, Germany 4750674 (S.W.)
Protein diversification is commonly driven by single amino acid changes at random positions followed by selection, but, in some cases, the structure of the gene itself favors the occurrence of particular kinds of mutations. Genes encoding hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins (HRGPs) in green organisms, key protein constituents of the cell wall, carry short-repeat modules that are posited to specify proline hydroxylation and/or glycosylation events. We show here, in a comparison of two closely related Chlamydomonas species—Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CC-621) and Chlamydomonas incerta (CC-1870/3871)—that these modules are prone to misalignment and hence to both insertion/deletion and endoduplication events, and that the dynamics of the rearrangements are constrained by purifying selection on the repeat patterns themselves, considered either as helical or as longitudinal face modules. We suggest that such dynamics may contribute to evolutionary diversification in cell wall architecture and physiology. Two of the HRGP genes analyzed (SAG1 and SAD1) encode the mating-type plus and minus sexual agglutinins, displayed only by gametes, and we document that these have undergone far more extensive divergence than two HRGP genes (GP1 and VSP3) that encode cell wall components—an example of the rapid evolution that characterizes sex-related proteins in numerous lineages. Strikingly, the central regions of the agglutinins of both mating types have diverged completely, by selective endoduplication of repeated motifs, since the two species last shared a common ancestor, suggesting that these events may have participated in the speciation process.
1 This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant no. GM–26150), the National Science Foundation (grant no. MCB 0326829), and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant no. Wa 659/8–1 to S.W.). The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Ursula Goodenough (ursula{at}biology.wustl.edu). [W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. [OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.107.100891 * Corresponding author; e-mail ursula{at}biology.wustl.edu; fax 314–935–5125. Received April 25, 2007; accepted May 31, 2007; published June 15, 2007. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|