Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online January 11, 2008; 10.1104/pp.107.107052

Plant Physiology 146:1358-1367 (2008)
© 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
146/3/1358    most recent
pp.107.107052v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poulter, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Franklin-Tong, V. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poulter, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Franklin-Tong, V. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Poulter, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Franklin-Tong, V. E.
CELL BIOLOGY AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION

Microtubules Are a Target for Self-Incompatibility Signaling in Papaver Pollen1

Natalie S. Poulter, Sabina Vatovec and Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong*

School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom

Perception and integration of signals into responses is of crucial importance to cells. Both the actin and microtubule cytoskeleton are known to play a role in mediating diverse stimulus responses. Self-incompatibility (SI) is an important mechanism to prevent self-fertilization. SI in Papaver rhoeas triggers a Ca2+-dependent signaling network to trigger programmed cell death (PCD), providing a neat way to inhibit and destroy incompatible pollen. We previously established that SI stimulates F-actin depolymerization and that altering actin dynamics can push pollen tubes into PCD. Very little is known about the role of microtubules in pollen tubes. Here, we investigated whether the pollen tube microtubule cytoskeleton is a target for the SI signals. We show that SI triggers very rapid apparent depolymerization of cortical microtubules, which, unlike actin, does not reorganize later. Actin depolymerization can trigger microtubule depolymerization but not vice versa. Moreover, although disruption of microtubule dynamics alone does not trigger PCD, alleviation of SI-induced PCD by taxol implicates a role for microtubule depolymerization in mediating PCD. Together, our data provide good evidence that SI signals target the microtubule cytoskeleton and suggest that signal integration between microfilaments and microtubules is required for triggering of PCD.


1 This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (to V.E.F.-T. and a studentship to N.S.P.). S.V. worked as an undergraduate project student from the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong (v.e.franklin-tong{at}bham.ac.uk).

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.107.107052

* Corresponding author; e-mail v.e.franklin-tong{at}bham.ac.uk.

Received August 8, 2007; accepted December 15, 2007; published January 11, 2008.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Plant Biologists