|
|
||||||||
|
First published online October 26, 2007; 10.1104/pp.107.110262 Plant Physiology 145:1714-1725 (2007) © 2007 American Society of Plant Biologists Root Plasma Membrane Transporters Controlling K+/Na+ Homeostasis in Salt-Stressed Barley1,[C],[W]School of Agricultural Science (Z.C., T.A.C., S.S.) and School of Mathematics and Physics (I.A.N.), University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia; Centro Universitario de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad de Colima, Colima 28045, Mexico (I.I.P., I.Z.-J.); Department of Plant Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK–1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark (A.T.F., M.G.P.); Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia (M.T., D.J.); and Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research, University of Tasmania, Kings Meadows, Tasmania 7249, Australia (M.Z.)
Plant salinity tolerance is a polygenic trait with contributions from genetic, developmental, and physiological interactions, in addition to interactions between the plant and its environment. In this study, we show that in salt-tolerant genotypes of barley (Hordeum vulgare), multiple mechanisms are well combined to withstand saline conditions. These mechanisms include: (1) better control of membrane voltage so retaining a more negative membrane potential; (2) intrinsically higher H+ pump activity; (3) better ability of root cells to pump Na+ from the cytosol to the external medium; and (4) higher sensitivity to supplemental Ca2+. At the same time, no significant difference was found between contrasting cultivars in their unidirectional 22Na+ influx or in the density and voltage dependence of depolarization-activated outward-rectifying K+ channels. Overall, our results are consistent with the idea of the cytosolic K+-to-Na+ ratio being a key determinant of plant salinity tolerance, and suggest multiple pathways of controlling that important feature in salt-tolerant plants.
1 This work was supported by Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery (grant no. DP0449856) and Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST) grants (to S.S.), Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC; UT8) and DEST grants (to M.Z.), and ARC Discovery (grant no. A00105708 to I.A.N.). M.T. was supported by the ARC and GRDC. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Sergey Shabala (sergey.shabala{at}utas.edu.au). [C] Some figures in this article are displayed in color online but in black and white in the print edition. [W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.107.110262 * Corresponding author; e-mail sergey.shabala{at}utas.edu.au. Received October 1, 2007; accepted October 23, 2007; published October 26, 2007.
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|