OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

This Article Free via Open Access: OA OA Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data OA All Versions of this Article: 146/3/996    most recent pp.107.111971v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gao, L.-L. Articles by Singh, K. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gao, L.-L. Articles by Singh, K. B. Agricola Articles by Gao, L.-L. Articles by Singh, K. B. Related Collections Plant-Herbivore Interactions Legume Biology

Characterization of Pea Aphid Resistance in Medicago truncatula^1,[W],[OA]

CSIRO Plant Industry (L.-L.G., J.P.K., J.P.A., K.B.S.) and CSIRO Entomology (L.-L.G., J.P.K., O.R.E.), Wembley, Western Australia 6913, Australia

To achieve a thorough understanding of plant-aphid interactions, it is necessary to investigate in detail both the plant and insect side of the interaction. The pea aphid (PA; Acyrthosiphon pisum) has been selected by an international consortium as the model species for genetics and genomics studies, and the model legume Medicago truncatula is a host of this aphid. In this study, we identified resistance to PA in a M. truncatula line, ‘Jester’, with well-characterized resistance to a closely related aphid, the bluegreen aphid (BGA; Acyrthosiphon kondoi). The biology of resistance to the two aphid species shared similarity, with resistance in both cases occurring at the level of the phloem, requiring an intact plant and involving a combination of antixenosis, antibiosis, and plant tolerance. In addition, PA resistance cosegregated in ‘Jester’ with a single dominant gene for BGA resistance. These results raised the possibility that both resistances may be mediated by the same mechanism. This was not supported by the results of gene induction studies, and resistance induced by BGA had no effect on PA feeding. Moreover, different genetic backgrounds containing a BGA resistance gene from the same resistance donor differ in resistance to PA. These results suggest that distinct mechanisms are involved in resistance to these two aphid species. Resistance to PA and BGA in the same genetic background in M. truncatula makes this plant an attractive model for the study of both plant and aphid components of resistant and susceptible plant-aphid interactions.

² Present address: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Karam B. Singh (karam.singh{at}csiro.au).

^[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.

^[OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.107.111971

^* Corresponding author; e-mail karam.singh{at}csiro.au.

Received October 29, 2007; accepted December 29, 2007; published January 9, 2008.