Skip to main content

Main menu

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleGROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
You have accessRestricted Access

Gibberellin Dose-Response Curves and the Characterization of Dwarf Mutants of Barley

Peter M. Chandler, Masumi Robertson
Peter M. Chandler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masumi Robertson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published June 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.120.2.623

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Growth of L1 of wild-type barley. Grains were surface-sterilized, placed in moist paper envelopes, stratified, and incubated as described in Methods. At the indicated times the mean L1 lengths of 10 seedlings were determined, as well as the mean lengths of the blade and sheath. Where not visible, error (se) bars lie within the symbols. Inset, Mean elongation rate of the blade of L1 in the previous 24 h was plotted as a function of days of growth. The LERmax value for this set of data is indicated.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Dose-response curves relating LERmaxof L1 to [GA3]. Grains of the indicated lines were surface-sterilized, placed in paper envelopes moistened with the appropriate [GA3], stratified, incubated in low light, and LERmax (mean ± se) of seedling L1 was determined as described in Methods. Curves in the top six panels were fitted using PEST software (Weyers et al., 1987). Note differences in the range of GA3 concentrations in different panels.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    LERmax of L1 ofelo mutants and a grd mutant growing with or without tetcyclacis and GA3. Grains of M21 (elo1), M626 (elo2), and M117 (grd1) were surface-sterilized, placed in moist paper envelopes containing, where appropriate, 2 μm tetcyclacis or 2 μm tetcyclacis plus 10 μmGA3, stratified, and incubated under low light; and the mean LERmax of seedling L1 was determined as described in Methods. A replicate consisted of 10 seedlings, and there were three replicates for each genotype and treatment. Within a genotype, letters (a, b, or c) indicate significance (P < 0.05) for the differences between the means of each treatment.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    LERmax of L1 ofSln1− and sln1sln1 segregants in different genetic backgrounds. Grains from stocks in which thesln1 allele was segregating in different genetic backgrounds (WT, wild type; grd1, M117;gse1, M121; and elo1; M21) were surface-sterilized, placed in moist paper envelopes, stratified, and incubated in low light, and the LERmax (means ±se) of seedling L1 was determined as described in Methods. In an elo1 background, slender (sln1sln1) seedlings cannot be distinguished at the first leaf stage from Sln1− seedlings, but after transplanting and further growth, the early stem elongation characteristic of sln1sln1 plants, which still occurs in anelo1 genetic background, allowed the genotype to be determined.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Dose-response curves comparing the effects of GA3 on either LERmax or final blade length. Grains of the indicated lines were surface-sterilized, placed in paper envelopes moistened with the appropriate [GA3], stratified, and incubated in low light, and LERmax(mean ± se) or final blade length of seedling L1 was determined as described in Methods. To allow direct comparison, response ratios are plotted in which the LERmax or L1 blade length in the absence of GA3 is assigned a value of unity. Curves are the same (minus data points) as shown in Figure 2. Individual data points (▾) are for final blade length.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    LERmax (means ± se) of different grd mutants in the presence of GA-biosynthetic intermediates. Grains of M117 (grd1), M359 (grd2), and M411 (grd3) were surface-sterilized, placed in paper envelopes moistened with the indicated GA at 2 μm, stratified, and incubated in low light, and LERmax (means ± se) of seedling L1 was determined as described in Methods. GA44, GA19, and GA20 are successive biosynthetic intermediates in the early 13-hydroxylation pathway leading to the formation of the bioactive GA1.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    α-Amylase activity of de-axised grains of the wild type and a gse1 mutant incubated with different [GA3]. The embryonic axes of wild type and M488 (gse1) grains were removed, and the resulting de-axised grains were surface-sterilized, placed in paper envelopes moistened with the indicated [GA3], stratified, and incubated in low light as described in Methods. At the indicated times, duplicate samples (five grains each) were harvested and α-amylase was extracted and assayed. Each data point is the mean of duplicate samples.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table I.

    Parameters estimated from GA3dose-response curves

    GenotypeRMINRMAXp[H]50
    mm d−1 nm
    Wild type36.5  ± 3.167.5  ± 5.80.96  ± 0.08120
    grd Mutants
     M117 (grd1)12.0  ± 1.156.5  ± 5.30.98  ± 0.0958
     M359 (grd2)15.0  ± 1.460.3  ± 5.80.98  ± 0.0984
     M411 (grd3)11.6  ± 1.056.9  ± 5.10.91  ± 0.0856
    gse Mutants
     M121 (gse1)12.8  ± 1.050.0  ± 4.00.47  ± 0.049,500
     M488 (gse1)11.2  ± 0.952.5  ± 4.30.61  ± 0.0543,000

    Mean values (and their 95% confidence limits) of parameters (see text for explanation of symbols) were estimated for the fitted curves shown in Figure 2 using PEST software (Weyers et al., 1987).

    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    Table of Contents

    Print
    Download PDF
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Physiology.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Gibberellin Dose-Response Curves and the Characterization of Dwarf Mutants of Barley
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Physiology
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Physiology web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Gibberellin Dose-Response Curves and the Characterization of Dwarf Mutants of Barley
    Peter M. Chandler, Masumi Robertson
    Plant Physiology Jun 1999, 120 (2) 623-632; DOI: 10.1104/pp.120.2.623

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    Gibberellin Dose-Response Curves and the Characterization of Dwarf Mutants of Barley
    Peter M. Chandler, Masumi Robertson
    Plant Physiology Jun 1999, 120 (2) 623-632; DOI: 10.1104/pp.120.2.623
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • MATERIALS AND METHODS
      • RESULTS
      • DISCUSSION
      • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
      • Footnotes
      • Abbreviations:
      • LITERATURE  CITED
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    In this issue

    Plant Physiology: 120 (2)
    Plant Physiology
    Vol. 120, Issue 2
    Jun 1999
    • Table of Contents
    • About the Cover
    • Index by author
    View this article with LENS

    More in this TOC Section

    • The Expression of Small Heat Shock Proteins in Seeds Responds to Discrete Developmental Signals and Suggests a General Protective Role in Desiccation Tolerance
    • The Expression of D-Cyclin Genes Defines Distinct Developmental Zones in Snapdragon Apical Meristems and Is Locally Regulated by the Cycloidea Gene
    • Independent Action of ELF3 and phyB to Control Hypocotyl Elongation and Flowering Time
    Show more GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

    Similar Articles

    Our Content

    • Home
    • Current Issue
    • Plant Physiology Preview
    • Archive
    • Focus Collections
    • Classic Collections
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • Plantae
    • ASPB

    For Authors

    • Instructions
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • Policies
    • Recognizing our Authors

    For Reviewers

    • Instructions
    • Journal Miles
    • Policies

    Other Services

    • Permissions
    • Librarian resources
    • Advertise in our journals
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds

    Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

    Powered by HighWire