Skip to main content

Main menu

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
OtherUPDATE ON SIGNALING
You have accessRestricted Access

Ion Changes in Legume Root Hairs Responding to Nod Factors

Luis Cárdenas, Terena L. Holdaway-Clarke, Federico Sánchez, Carmen Quinto, José A. Feijó, Joseph G. Kunkel, Peter K. Hepler
Luis Cárdenas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Terena L. Holdaway-Clarke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Federico Sánchez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carmen Quinto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
José A. Feijó
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph G. Kunkel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter K. Hepler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published June 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.123.2.443

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • Copyright © 2000 American Society of Plant Physiologists

The formation of nitrogen-fixing nodules in leguminous plants involves a subtle, two-way interaction between a bacterium and its host plant. The host plant produces signaling molecules, e.g. flavonoids, to which the bacterium responds, generating its own set of signaling molecules, the Nod factors. The latter are lipochitooligosaccharides (LCOs) and are responsible for the specificity in the symbiotic relationship between a bacterium and its host during nodule development (Long, 1996; Schultze and Kondorosi, 1998). In response to Nod factors, the root hair of the susceptible plant undergoes a deformation that leads to entrapment and invasion of the bacterium. While isolated Nod factors are unable to induce the formation of infection threads, they are capable of stimulating the early steps of a pre-infection thread formation and root hair deformation (Fig. 1), and thus their use permits the experimental analysis of the initial events in signal transduction leading to nodules. Among the most rapid responses described are those involving changes in membrane potential and certain ions, notably Ca2+, Cl−, and H+. Given the well-recognized regulatory and physiological roles of these ions, it seems important to generate a consensus regarding not only the temporal nature of their response after the application of Nod factors, but their spatial characteristics and choreography. Together, these pieces of information could contribute fundamentally in our quest to decipher the primary events that underlie the initial response of the host plant to Nod factors. In the last few years, there have been several reports that directly address these issues, and for that reason it seems appropriate to review the progress that has been made and to provide direction for future endeavors.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

The morphological effect of Nod factors and control chitin-oligomer on root hairs of bean. A, Root hair treated with a chitin-oligomer appears normal without deformation. B and C, In response to Nod factors, root hairs show different degrees of swelling. D, Following swelling, in the continued presence of Nod factors, root hairs re-initiate apical growth. E, A bifurcated root hair as demonstrated by the two new points of growth, and finally the root hair curling response is observed at the apical region in F. The swelling response usually occurs within 2 h after Nod factor exposure, but re-initiation of growth, branching, and curling are observed 4 h later. All of the responding root hair cells are growing and belong to region II, which is defined as the responsive zone (Heidstra et al., 1994).

Nod FACTORS CAUSE A DEPOLARIZATION OF THE MEMBRANE POTENTIAL

Ehrhardt et al. (1992) first noted that alfalfa (Medicago sativa) root cells, impaled with microelectrodes, exhibited a transient depolarization of the membrane potential of 20 mV in response to Rhizobium meliloti cell-free filtrates. The depolarization was desensitized by repeated exposure to these factors and was not observed in a non-legume (tomato cells), suggesting host specificity. An important contribution of this work was the observation that purified Nod factor from R. meliloti (NodRm-IV[S]) maintained the capability to induce the membrane depolarization. This single assay has provided a useful tool for dissecting the mechanism of Nod signal perception in early nodulation. Application of purified Nod factors induced a depolarization starting 30 to 60 s after the factors first reached the root cells. Once initiated, depolarization was slow, with a maximum response being reached in an average of 540 s. The electrical membrane response was dose dependent, having its major effect at 10−8 and 10−7 m Nod factor, which is the same range that induces root hair deformation. Repolarization of the membrane potential occurs spontaneously over 25 to 30 min even in the presence of Nod factors.

The findings of Ehrhardt et al. (1992) have been confirmed and extended by Kurkdjian (1995) and by Felle et al. (1995), who routinely recorded depolarizations of 20 to 40 mV in alfalfa. Kurkdjian (1995) reported that repolarization of the plasma membrane actually occurs in two steps: an initial fast phase occurs from 30 to 60 s, during which the membrane potential recovers to about one-half the value of the total depolarization and remains stable for a few minutes. The second phase is usually slower, lasting about 15 min, although the length may be variable. Felle et al. (1995) further showed that under optimal concentrations of Nod factor (3 × 10−8 m) and with improved instrument sensitivity, the depolarization response exhibits a delay of only 15 s. Detailed molecular specificity has also been established, with the finding that those factors that are most active in producing root hair deformation are the ones that also elicit the membrane depolarization.

Curiously, however, while non-legumes do not respond, it was noted that a Nod (−) mutant of alfalfa (MN NN-1008) unable to undergo root hair curling displayed membrane depolarization, although weakly (Felle et al., 1995). There is some disagreement concerning which cell types show a response, with Kurkdjian (1995) allowing that bulging epidermal cells, i.e. those initiating a root hair, were very sensitive, while those that were not bulging were insensitive. In contrast, Felle et al. (1995) reported that epidermal cells in the root hair zone respond with membrane depolarization, as do root hairs. Felle et al. (1995) also showed that the depolarization event is preceded by a small, brief, but clearly detectable hyperpolarization of the membrane potential, which may have some function. They also note that the Nod-induced depolarization does not provoke a change in membrane conductance (Felle et al., 1995). In a more recent study, Felle et al. (1998) addressed the mechanism by which the depolarization is generated, and concluded, based on studies using stationary ion-selective extracellular electrodes, that Cl− efflux in response to elevated cytosolic [Ca2+] is responsible for the membrane depolarization. In this model, charge balance would be provided by K+ efflux and re-polarization through the activity of the H+ pump, two general features of most plant electrophysiological responses. Felle et al. have since demonstrated the necessity of the rise in cytosolic Ca2+ for activation of downstream events such as Cl− efflux and membrane depolarization (Felle et al., 1999a). (Further discussion of Ca2+ issues will occur in a later section of this Update.)

Despite the unique and specific features of the Nod factor-induced membrane depolarization, it does not appear to be the primary signal event. First, it appears only after 15 s, which is at best equal to or slower than reported changes in intracellular pH or extracellular Ca2+ (see below). In addition, membrane potential depolarization is a reasonably common event in plant cells (Felle et al., 1995), and the circumstances under which they are recorded are rather artificial compared with the plant growing in soil. Under laboratory conditions, the entire root is flooded by Nod factor, very likely eliciting a more pronounced, global effect on the membrane potential than that caused by soil bacteria, which, by contrast, would probably induce a much more localized effect (Felle et al., 1995). It seems likely, therefore, that modulation of the membrane properties for other ions, notably Ca2+ and H+, is responsible both for the initial signal transduction events and for the downstream transmission of this signal.

Nod FACTORS ALTER INTRACELLULAR AND EXTRACELLULAR pH

An important contribution to the understanding of Nod signal perception was provided by Felle et al. (1996) with the demonstration that there is a rapid (within 15 s) cytoplasmic alkalinization of 0.2 to 0.3 pH units in alfalfa root hair cells in response to Nod factors. This response was induced with 10−8 m Nod factor; a subsequent response with a higher concentration was not observed, indicating a desensitization of the cells. Although the non-sulfated variants are essentially inactive in inducing root hair deformation (Schultze et al., 1992) and membrane depolarization (Felle et al., 1996), these molecules can induce cytoplasmic alkalinization. It is even possible to generate an additive response when the non-sulfated factor is followed by the sulfated Nod factor. This lack of a causal linkage between membrane potential depolarization and alkalinity increase allowed the authors to propose a hypothesis based on an independent perception system for the sulfated and unsulfated molecules (Felle et al., 1996). Both perception systems might have evolved from a common ancestor, and one was selected during evolution to trigger symbiosis to sulfated Nod factors. On the other hand, the perception system for non-sulfated Nod factors may represent an evolutionary relic that is still functional and able to recognize undecorated Nod signal structures (Felix et al., 1993; Baureithel et al., 1994; Staehelin et al., 1994).

Given the alkalinization of the cytosol in response to Nod factors, a question is raised concerning the status of H+ in the space surrounding the root hair. It might be predicted that an increase of pH within the cell would be coupled with a decrease of pH in the surrounding space. Using a stationary ion-selective electrode,Felle et al. (1998) found that the pH of the medium around the root hair, while remaining acidic, becomes less so in response to Nod factors; thus, the pH increases from 6.3 to 6.7. It is not clear why the pH changes occur in the same direction both inside and outside the cell. This finding was explained by Felle et al. (1998) by considering the linear relationships between the predictably different buffering capacity of the extra and intracellular compartments. It has long been known that protons efflux and influx at different levels along the root (Weisenseel et al., 1979; Miller, 1989; Miller and Gow, 1989). Current flow (Hamada et al., 1992) and proton profiles (Peters and Felle, 1999) are undoubtedly related to the coordination of root growth. Thus, it follows that this complexity of proton regulation is likely to be the result of a system more elaborate than just two compartments with different buffering properties. For these and other reasons, further attention to pH is warranted, especially since H+ may play a central role in the regulation of Nod-induced events. Indeed, detailed exploration of the pH patterns along a root using ion-specific vibrating probes would better define the modifications after challenge with Nod factors, since this technique is well known to be at least 1 order of magnitude more sensitive to small gradient alterations than the stationary pH electrodes used so far (Küthreiber and Jaffe, 1990; Kochian et al., 1992).

An additional concern with the intracellular pH measurements stems from the realization that an electrode, while providing an accurate temporal record of change, only samples one small point within the cell. Although not specified by Felle et al. (1996), presumably this position is located close to the apex of the root hair, but not at the extreme apex itself. While we accept with confidence that the pH has increased at the point at which measurements are taken, we cannot extrapolate to the entire root hair. We know from recent studies of pollen tubes, which are also tip-growing cells, that there are microdomains within the apical region that express different values of pH; specifically an acidic domain is found at the extreme apex of the tube, and an alkaline band 10 to 20 μm back from the tip (Feijó et al., 1999). Again, a preliminary numerical assessment of the non-linearities of this kind of distribution challenge simplistic views based solely on the linear buffering capacities, which assume that the whole cytoplasm behaves homogeneously (Feijó et al., 1999). With these thoughts in mind, it becomes important in future work to image cytosolic pH in root hairs and to determine the position of altered cytosolic pH induced by the application of Nod factors.

Nod FACTORS STIMULATE CHANGES IN THE INTRACELLULAR Ca2+ CONCENTRATION

Among the ions thought to participate in Nod factor-induced signal transduction, Ca2+ has occupied a prime position because of its involvement in a myriad of other physiological and developmental processes (Bush, 1995). Recently, the importance of extracellular Ca2+ has been demonstrated by its necessity for expression of Nod factor-induced genes (Pingret et al., 1998). Observations of Ehrhardt et al. (1996) substantiated early assumptions on the involvement of Ca2+ in the Nod signaling pathway by showing that Nod factors induced a spiking of cytosolic Ca2+ in alfalfa root hairs. The response starts about 9 min after the application of Nod factors and is characterized by an oscillation in the cytosolic [Ca2+] occurring in the perinuclear region at 1-min intervals for time periods of 20 to 60 min. The response has specificity, since the Nod factors from R. leguminosarum bvviciae are unable to induce cytosolic Ca2+ spiking. In addition, tomato root hair cells failed to show any change in intracellular Ca2+in response to the Nod factor. The alfalfa mutant MN NN-1008 (Peterson and Barnes, 1981) also failed to show Ca2+spiking, whereas seedlings from the parental lines showed a normal pattern.

Despite the clarity of this study, there are several questions that remain unresolved. For example, the spiking is very slow to start, and thus would appear not to be a primary signal event, but rather one that follows other rapid processes. Also, Ehrhardt et al. (1996) failed to denote an apical intracellular Ca2+ gradient or modulation thereof, despite the increasing number of reports indicating that these gradients are common features of growing root hairs (Clarkson et al., 1988; Schiefelbein et al., 1992; Jones et al., 1995;Bibikova et al., 1997; Felle and Hepler, 1997; Cárdenas et al., 1999). The above may be related to the observation that the root hair depicted by Ehrhardt et al. (1996) was not growing, and thus not exhibiting a gradient, and therefore may have been incapable of undergoing deformation.

A more recent study of Vigna root hairs allows that active Nod factors induce a rapid (within a few seconds) plateau-like increase in intracellular Ca2+ (Gehring et al., 1997). However, the results presented to support their conclusion are fraught with substantial problems. Gehring et al. (1997) used the acetoxy methylester form of both fura-2 and fluo-3, but failed to take into account the likelihood that perhaps a significant percentage of the dye is cleaved by esterases present in the cell wall and never enters the cytosol. That the above criticism has merit derives from their published graphs (figure 3, A and D, in Gehring et al. [1997]) showing that the alleged intracellular Ca2+signal, which is elevated in response to Nod factor, declines to a basal level within a few seconds following the addition of EGTA. Correspondingly, the application of Ca2+ to the bathing medium caused a rapid increase in the signal. The rapidity of these secondary responses, together with the realization that intact plasma membranes are not freely permeable to either EGTA or Ca2+, lends support to the conclusion that the changes in [Ca2+] being reported are largely derived from the extracellular compartment.

A second major problem is the tendency for the AM-ester dyes that have entered the cytosol to become sequestered in the vacuole and other membrane-bound compartments. Gehring et al. (1997)acknowledged that this occurred, but downplayed its significance. Nevertheless, even a small amount of sequestered dye could be a major source of confusion, since it will likely be in a compartment with excess Ca2+, e.g. the vacuole, and thus generate a saturating signal, shifting the dynamic range of detection of the camera to levels at which cytosolic signals are lost. It should also be noted that the results obtained with the two dyes are quite different, with the fura-2 signal rising fast, but then declining to the basal level in 13 to 15 min, while the fluo-3 signal continues to rise beyond 15 min. Finally, the imaging fails to provide evidence for an apical gradient or for the kinds of precisely localized events known to occur in root hairs (de Ruijter et al., 1998; Cárdenas et al., 1999).

In defense of the study by Gehring et al. (1997), it must be recognized that the changes they report show specificity for Vigna root hairs, as opposed to non-legumes, and for active as opposed to inactive Nod factor. Could it be that the rapid change they report is a Nod factor-specific event in the cell wall or at the cell wall-plasma membrane interface? As mentioned above, there are too many uncertainties about the localization of the reporting dye that make this study difficult to interpret.

A more compelling observation has been made by de Ruijter et al. (1998), who used acid loading of indo-1 and showed that the apical [Ca2+] increases 6-fold to 10-fold in root hairs of Vicia sativa, which have been treated with Nod factors. Due to the time it takes to load the indicator dye and other technical problems, their first measurement could not be made until after 70 min of incubation in Nod factors. The authors also noted that because of degradation in the signal from the dye, they were unable to make repetitive observations. Nevertheless, their snapshot approach reveals a clear apical localization of Ca2+, which increases following application of Nod factors. However, changes in the [Ca2+] during time periods earlier than 70 min, when the signal perception is taking place, were not indicated.

More recently, we addressed the question concerning the status of cytosolic Ca2+ with particular emphasis on the spatial location of the change that occurs within the first few minutes following the application of Nod factors (Cárdenas et al., 1999). These studies, which have been carried out in root hairs of the Mexican black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) with dextranated fura-2 microinjected into the hairs, show a modest Ca2+gradient around 400 nm under control conditions that increases to 1,500 to 1,800 nm within 5 to 10 min following the application of active Nod factors (Fig.2). Subsequently, i.e. after 10 to 15 min, oscillatory changes are observed in the region of the nucleus. However, in these studies the changes within the apical domain standout because they are more rapid and of greater magnitude than those in the region of the nucleus and would appear most closely allied with root hair deformation. Not only does the apical [Ca2+] increase markedly, but it also displays spatial mobility. Thus, within a few seconds a hot spot can disappear in one location and reappear in another location, all occurring within the apical region.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Apical Ca2+ gradient in bean root hair cells loaded with fura-2 dextran. A, Under control conditions or when the hairs are treated with the control chitin-oligomer, the modest Ca2+ gradient has a highest concentration of at 400 nm at the tip, dropping to basal levels (approximately 100 nm) within 30 μm from apex. Arrow indicates the nuclear region and arrowheads regions of slightly elevated [Ca2+] in the cytoplasm. B, Effect of Nod factors on intracellular [Ca2+]. Images a and b show the same root hair 3 s apart within 5 min after application of Nod factors. The intracellular apical [Ca2+] gradient initially increased from 400 nm to approximately 1,500 nm. These [Ca2+] responses were highly localized in the apical dome with spots of elevated [Ca2+] scattered in the cytoplasm that moved over time. Arrows indicate the nuclear region and arrowheads regions of slightly elevated [Ca2+] in the cytoplasm. (Reproduced with permission from Cárdenas et al. [1999].)

Rapid changes in the intracellular [Ca2+] (approximately 1–2 min) have been reported by Felle et al. (1999b) in root hairs of Medicago sativa following application of Nod factor from R. meliloti. These studies, which used an ion-selective intracellular electrode as the detection method, reported a decline in the apical Ca2+ gradient in the apical-most 5 to 10 μm, with an increase in the shank 20 μm from the tip (Felle et al., 1999b). Although these results differ somewhat from those obtained by ratio imaging (Cárdenas et al., 1999), it must be emphasized that the Ca2+-selective electrode can only measure [Ca2+] at one point in the cell, while ratiometric ion imaging is able to provide information on cytosolic [Ca2+] in all parts of the cell. For instance, by imaging with injected fura-2 dextran,Cárdenas et al. (1999) found that the Ca2+gradient in bean root hair cells can be steep enough to drop to basal levels within 10 μm from the tip (Fig. 2B), which would not be detected by the stationary ion probe. Given the chaotic nature of root hair curling and deformation following application of Nod factors, it is reasonable to imagine that these fluctuating intracellular Ca2+ changes observed by ratiometric ion imaging are a key underlying regulatory component causing rapid spatial change in the place of vesicle secretion and thus of cell extension.

Nod FACTORS INDUCE RAPID CHANGES IN EXTRACELLULAR Ca2+

A role for Ca2+ gains further support from studies that focus on its changes in the space outside the root hair. Using the extracellular ion-specific vibrating electrode, Allen et al. (1994) first noted changes in the Ca2+ current that were usually expressed as an influx focused at the root hair tip. More recently, using stationary ion-selective electrodes to measure the [Ca2+] in the solution surrounding the root hair, Felle et al. (1998) showed that the concentration drops within a few seconds following the application of the Nod factor. Commenting on the rapidity of the extracellular Ca2+ reduction,Felle et al. (1998) emphasize that it is the very earliest ion change thus far observed. The importance of this observation is further underscored by their use of the Ca2+ ionophore A-23187, which produces an effect on root hairs that is nearly identical to the application of Nod factor. The interpretation is that Nod factor induces a rapid Ca2+ influx into the cytoplasm. Further support for this idea has been provided byCárdenas et al. (1999), who showed with the ion-selective vibrating electrode that Nod factor induces, within 5 min of application, a marked increase in Ca2+ influx at the hair apex. Not only does the magnitude of the influx increase 2- to 4-fold, but the area over which the influx occurs also increases.

While it is clear that an influx of extracellular Ca2+ increases quickly following the application of Nod factors, the underlying cause is less certain. For example, is the influx due to movement of ions across the plasma membrane and into the cytosol, or is it due to changes in ion-binding properties within the cell wall space? The marked remodeling of the cell wall, which must occur as part of root hair curling, could involve changes in pectic and other wall components that increase local affinity for Ca2+ (Carpita and Gibeaut, 1993). Unfortunately, the extracellular electrode cannot distinguish between ion entry into the cell wall domain and ions crossing the plasmalemma (Holdaway-Clarke et al., 1997). However, Felle et al. (1998) counter this argument by allowing that nifedipine, a Ca2+ channel blocker, inhibits the decline in extracellular [Ca2+], thus making influx across the plasma membrane seem at least a significant component of the Ca2+ movement. Studies by Pingret et al. (1998) and Felle et al. (1999a) using externally applied EGTA indicate that a minimum amount of external Ca2+ is required for Nod factor-induced gene expression and membrane depolarization, respectively, indicating the necessity of external Ca2+ crossing the plasma membrane for Nod signal transduction. This is further supported by the finding that external Sr2+ can replace Ca2+ in Nod factor-induced membrane depolarization (Felle et al., 1999a), while Mg2+cannot substitute for Ca2+ either here (Felle et al., 1999a) or in gene expression (Pingret et al., 1998).

In attempting to resolve these relative contributions of the cell wall and cytoplasm as Ca2+ sinks, it is also important to consider the magnitude of the changes observed and to see if they make sense from what we know about the relationship between intra- and extracellular Ca2+. By comparing the quantitative measurements of the intracellular gradient and the extracellular flux,Cárdenas et al. (1999) showed that the extracellular flux is approximately 10-fold greater than that needed to support the intracellular gradient. While Felle et al. (1998) do not state the actual magnitude of decline in the extracellular [Ca2+], we can infer from the level of the ion in the medium (100 μm) and from the fact that an electrode at a distance of 10 μm from the root hair will be relatively insensitive to ion changes immediately at the root hair surface, that the actual decline must have been large, especially compared with the very low cytosolic [Ca2+]. Although we recognize that some of the extracellular Ca2+ has crossed the plasma membrane, from these calculations it nevertheless seems likely that a certain amount of the influx depends upon binding to the cell wall rather than crossing the plasma membrane into the cytoplast. Resolving this conundrum could add valuable information to our understanding of the mechanism of Nod factor action.

CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK

Considerable evidence indicates that changes in Ca2+, H+, Cl−, and the membrane potential are the most rapid detectable events in root hairs following the application of Nod factor (Fig. 3). By determining which particular change is first, and where it occurs spatially, we come closer to understanding the sequence of events that constitute the signal transduction cascade leading to nodule formation. We also gain valuable insight about the function and even molecular character of the Nod factor receptor. For example, the close temporal proximity of the application of Nod factors, with an increase in external Cl− and a decrease in external Ca2+, indicate that the Nod receptor and the two ion channels may be closely associated. At the moment the single most rapid event measured with confidence is the decline of [Ca2+] in the solution surrounding the root hair within a few seconds of addition of Nod factor (Felle et al., 1998). The fastest the corresponding Ca2+ change in the cytosol has been observed is 1.5 min after Nod factor application (Felle et al., 1999b), but future studies may well show that it is much faster. Spatially, it seems important that these early changes in cytosolic Ca2+ are focused at the apex of the root hair, where they would be ideally positioned to modulate the secretion necessary for growth and deformation.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Time mapping of events occurring in response to Nod factors. Wedges indicate start, peak, and end of response. Black bars show time over which phenomena are observed. Italics represent a hypothesized event. Numbers in parentheses refer to the following references, which are the first report of each phenomenon: 1, Felle et al. (1998); 2, Felle et al. (1999b); 3, Cárdenas et al. (1999); 4, de Ruijter et al. (l 998); 5, Ehrhardt et al. (1996); 6, Felle et al. (1996); 7, Ehrhardt et al. (1992); and 8, Cárdenas et al. (1998). Times for root hair swelling and growth re-initiation vary between species; times given are for bean.

An alternate view, however, places the Ca2+influx event downstream from a heterotrimeric G protein-mediated step (Pingret et al., 1998). Building upon the selective activities of various pharmacological agents for G proteins (mastoparan; pertussis toxin) and phospholipase C (neomycin; U73122), which appropriately mimic or inhibit Nod-induced gene expression, Pingret et al. (1998) suggest that the Nod receptor sequentially acts through a G protein, and then phospholipase C. Ca2+ is a part of their scheme, since its omission or blockage by different agents (EGTA, La3+, ruthenuim red) inhibits mastoparan induction of Nod-related events. By analogy with established pathways from animal systems, Pingret et al. (1998) conclude that Ca2+ influx follows phospholipase C activation, although the possibility of a direct interaction between the G protein and a Ca2+ channel is acknowledged. In our view, however, their results do not exclude the possibility of a Ca2+ influx that precedes G protein activation. We again note the study of Felle et al. (1998) showing that the Ca2+ ionophore A-23187 mimics Nod factor-induced events, lending support to the idea that Ca2+influx is a primary step in the signal transduction cascade.

Definitive answers to several questions could greatly enlarge our understanding of Nod factor action and the cascade of events leading to the formation of the root nodule. First, it is important to measure the change in intracellular [Ca2+] at short time intervals (e.g. 1 s or faster) following the application of Nod factors. If the rapid extracellular concentration decline reported represents passage of ions across the plasma membrane, this event should be detected as a rise of cytosolic [Ca2+] in the root hair. Imaging this response will be important to tell us exactly where the change occurs. Given the uncertainty about the localization of AM-ester dyes (Gehring et al., 1997), and the technical problems associated with both acid loading (de Ruijter et al., 1998) and microinjection (Cárdenas et al., 1999), we recommend the use of a new generation of Ca2+ indicators, e.g. cameleon (Allen et al., 1999; Miyawaki et al., 1999), which can be transfected into the cell. With an endogenous reporter molecule, it should be possible to focus more closely on the temporal/spatial changes in intracellular free [Ca2+] following application of Nod factor.

Second, while the attention above is directed toward Ca2+, it could be informative to also make similar intracellular measurements of H+. As we have emphasized, the studies thus far with intracellular pH electrodes, while providing good temporal resolution, do not resolve matters relating to the spatial localization of H+changes. Since it is possible that there are closely juxtaposed acidic and alkaline domains within the root hair, it becomes important to document these through ratiometric ion imaging and to further determine how they are modulated by Nod factor.

Third, we also emphasize the importance of measuring ion activity in the cell wall space. We think it would be possible to purposely trap an indicator dye in the cell wall space. Bibikova et al. (1998) have succeeded in doing this for H+ in root hairs of Arabidopsis, permitting them to image ion changes associated with root hair formation. Successful completion of this study could provide valuable information about the timing and position of cell wall-associated changes in Ca2+ and H+ in response to Nod factor.

Finally, in addition to resolving what change occurs first, and where, in response to Nod factor, it will be informative to further characterize the downstream components that contribute to root hair curling, bacterial entrapment, and infection thread formation. Elevated levels of intracellular Ca2+ would be expected to facilitate secretion (Battey et al., 1999); indeed, the mobile Ca2+ hot spots in the apical domain observed byCárdenas et al. (1999) might be exactly the sort of process needed to generate the deformation of the root hair. Elevated Ca2+ and pH could also profoundly alter the structure and organization of the cytoskeleton (Kohno and Shimmen, 1987; and Andersland and Parthasarathy, 1993). There is emerging evidence that actin microfilaments, which extend as long cables in untreated root hairs, are markedly fragmented (Cárdenas et al., 1998) or induced to form fine bundles (Miller et al., 1999) shortly following the application of Nod factors. These observations are consistent with the activation of a Ca2+sensitive, actin-binding protein, such as villin that will fragment the existing bundles (Vidali et al., 1999). They are also consistent with the activation of cofilin/ADF, an actin-binding protein that participates in F-actin remodeling in regions of elevated pH (Gungabissoon et al., 1998). Regardless of the specific process that is responsible, the rapid loss of actin microfilament organization will contribute to the momentary loss of cell polarity and the induction of a new developmental program leading to root hair deformation and curling, which are necessary for bacterial infection.

Further studies on downstream activities should give attention to the perinuclear Ca2+ spikes. These would appear to be at least partly due to intracellular release, and may play a role in encoding signals to which the nucleus can respond in stimulating gene expression (Ehrhardt et al., 1996). Studies aimed at deciphering their origin or inhibiting their occurrence might produce novel information concerning their role in root hair deformation.

Although many pieces of the puzzle remain to be elucidated, it seems inescapable that Ca2+ and H+ play central roles in the physiological and developmental events that lead to root nodule formation. Further study of these ions is clearly warranted, since the temporal/spatial characterization of these initial steps could provide fundamental information about the signal transduction cascade induced by Nod factors.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported by Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (grant nos. IN200196 and 212298), by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologı́a, México (grant nos. N–9608 and N–27698 to C.Q. and nos. B9608 and N–27640 to F.S.), and by the U.S. National Science Foundation (grant no. MCB96–01087 to P.K.H.). J.A.F. received fellowships from the Fulbright Foundation, Luso-American Foundation for the Development, and Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation and granting from F.C.T. (grant no. PRAXIS/C/BIA/11034/1998). L.C. was supported by a scholarship from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnológia and an installation grant for young scientists (no. I 29972–N).

  • ↵* Corresponding author; e-mail luisc{at}ibt.unam.mx; fax 52–73–136600.

  • Received November 24, 1999.
  • Accepted February 14, 2000.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Allen GJ,
    2. Kwak JM,
    3. Chu SP,
    4. Llopis J,
    5. Tsien RY,
    6. Harper JF,
    7. Schroeder JI
    (1999) Cameleon calcium indicator reports cytoplasmic calcium dynamics in Arabidopsis guard cells. Plant J 19:735–748.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Daniels MJ,
    2. Downie JA,
    3. Osbourn AE
    1. Allen NS,
    2. Bennett MN,
    3. Cox DN,
    4. Shipley A,
    5. Ehrhardt DW,
    6. Long SR
    (1994) Effects of Nod factors on alfalfa root hair Ca2+ and H+ currents and cytoskeleton behavior. in Advances in Molecular Genetics of Plant-Microbe Interactions. eds Daniels MJ, Downie JA, Osbourn AE (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), pp 107–114.
  3. ↵
    1. Andersland JM,
    2. Parthasarathy MV
    (1993) Conditions affecting depolymerization of actin in plant homogenates. J Cell Sci 104:1273–1279.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  4. ↵
    1. Battey NH,
    2. James NC,
    3. Greenland AJ,
    4. Brownlee C
    (1999) Exocytosis and endocytosis. Plant Cell 11:643–660.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Baureithel K,
    2. Felix G,
    3. Boller T
    (1994) Specific, high affinity binding of chitin fragments to tomato cells and membranes: competitive inhibition of binding by derivatives of chitooligosaccharides and a Nod factor of Rhizobium. J Biol Chem 269:17931–17938.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Bibikova TN,
    2. Jacob T,
    3. Dahse I,
    4. Gilroy S
    (1998) Localized changes in apoplastic and cytoplasmic pH are associated with root hair development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 125:2925–2934.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  7. ↵
    1. Bibikova TN,
    2. Zhigilei A,
    3. Gilroy S
    (1997) Root hair growth in Arabidopsis thaliana is directed by calcium and endogenous polarity. Planta 203:495–505.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bush DS
    (1995) Calcium regulation in plant cells and its role in signaling. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 46:95–122.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Cárdenas L,
    2. Feijó JA,
    3. Kunkel JG,
    4. Sánchez F,
    5. Holdaway-Clarke TL,
    6. Hepler PK,
    7. Quinto C
    (1999) Rhizobium Nod factors induce increases in intracellular free calcium and extracellular calcium influxes in bean root hairs. Plant J 19:347–352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Cárdenas L,
    2. Vidali L,
    3. Domı́nguez J,
    4. Pérez H,
    5. Sánchez F,
    6. Hepler PK,
    7. Quinto C
    (1998) Rearrangement of actin microfilaments in plant root hairs responding to Rhizobium nodulation signals. Plant Physiol 116:871–877.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Carpita NC,
    2. Gibeaut DM
    (1993) Structural models of primary cell walls of flowering plants: consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. Plant J 3:1–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Clarkson DT,
    2. Brownlee C,
    3. Ayling SM
    (1988) Cytoplasmic calcium measurements in intact higher plant cells: results from fluorescence ratio imaging of fura-2. J Cell Sci 91:71–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. de Ruijter NCA,
    2. Rook MB,
    3. Bisseling T,
    4. Emons AMC
    (1998) Lipochito-oligosaccharides re-initiate root hair tip growth in Vicia sativa with high calcium and spectrin-like antigen at the tip. Plant J 13:341–350.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Ehrhardt DW,
    2. Atkinson EM,
    3. Long SR
    (1992) Depolarization of alfalfa root hair membrane potential by Rhizobium meliloti Nod factors. Science 256:998–1000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Ehrhardt DW,
    2. Wais R,
    3. Long SR
    (1996) Calcium spiking in plant root hairs responding to Rhizobium nodulation signals. Cell 85:673–681.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Feijó JA,
    2. Sainhas J,
    3. Hackett GR,
    4. Kunkel JG,
    5. Hepler PK
    (1999) Growing pollen tubes possess a constitutive alkaline band in the clear zone and a growth-dependent acidic tip. J Cell Biol 144:483–496.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Felix G,
    2. Regenass M,
    3. Boller T
    (1993) Specific perception of subnanomolar concentration of chitin fragments by tomato cells: induction of extracellular alkalinization, changes in protein phosphorylation, and establishment of a refractory state. Plant J 4:307–316.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Felle HH,
    2. Hepler PK
    (1997) The cytosolic Ca2+ concentration gradient of Sinapsis alba root hairs as revealed by Ca2+-selective microelectrode test and fura-dextran ratio imaging. Plant Physiol 114:39–45.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  19. ↵
    1. Felle HH,
    2. Kondorosi E,
    3. Kondorosi A,
    4. Schultze M
    (1995) Nod signal-induced plasma membrane potential changes in alfalfa root hairs are differently sensitive to structural modifications of the lipochitooligosaccharide. Plant J 7:939–947.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Felle HH,
    2. Kondorosi E,
    3. Kondorosi A,
    4. Schultze M
    (1996) Rapid alkalinization in alfalfa root hairs in response to rhizobial lipochitooligosaccharide signals. Plant J 10:295–301.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Felle HH,
    2. Kondorosi E,
    3. Kondorosi A,
    4. Schultze M
    (1998) The role of ion fluxes in Nod factor signaling in Medicago sativa. Plant J 13:455–463.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Felle HH,
    2. Kondorosi E,
    3. Kondorosi A,
    4. Schultze M
    (1999a) Elevation of the cytosolic free [Ca2+] is indispensable for the transduction of the Nod factor signal in alfalfa. Plant Physiol 121:273–279.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Felle HH,
    2. Kondorosi E,
    3. Kondorosi A,
    4. Schultze M
    (1999b) Nod factors modulate the concentration of cytosolic free calcium differently in growing and non-growing root hairs of Medicago sativa L. Planta 209:207–212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Gehring CA,
    2. Irving HR,
    3. Kabbara AA,
    4. Parish RW,
    5. Boukli NM,
    6. Broughton WJ
    (1997) Rapid, plateau-like increases in intracellular free calcium are associated with Nod-factor-induced root-hair deformation. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 7:791–802.
  25. ↵
    1. Gungabissoon RA,
    2. Jiang CJ,
    3. Drobak BK,
    4. Maciver SK,
    5. Hussey PJ
    (1998) Interaction of maize actin-depolymerising factor with actin and phosphoinositides and its inhibition of plant phospholipase C. Plant J 16:689–696.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Hamada S,
    2. Ezaki S,
    3. Hayashi K,
    4. Toko K,
    5. Yamafuji K
    (1992) Electric current precedes emergence of a lateral root in higher plants. Plant Physiol 100:614–619.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Heidstra R,
    2. Geurts R,
    3. Franssen H,
    4. Spaink HP,
    5. van Kammen A,
    6. Bisseling T
    (1994) Root hair deformation activity of nodulation factors and their fate on Vicia sativa. Plant Physiol 105:787–797.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  28. ↵
    1. Holdaway-Clarke TL,
    2. Feijó JA,
    3. Hackett GR,
    4. Kunkel JG,
    5. Hepler PK
    (1997) Pollen-tube growth and the intracellular cytosolic calcium gradient oscillate in phase while extracellular influx is delayed. Plant Cell 9:1999–2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Jones DL,
    2. Shaff JE,
    3. Kochian LV
    (1995) Role of calcium and other ions in directing root hair tip growth in Limnobium stoloniferum: I. Inhibition of tip growth by aluminum. Planta 197:672–680.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Kochian LV,
    2. Shaff JE,
    3. Küthreiber W,
    4. Jaffe L,
    5. Lucas WL
    (1992) Use of an extracellular, ion-selective, vibrating microelectrode system for the quantification of K+, H+, and Ca2+ fluxes in maize roots and maize suspension cells. Planta 188:601–610.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Kohno T,
    2. Shimmen T
    (1987) Ca2+-induced fragmentation of actin filaments in pollen tubes. Protoplasma 141:177–179.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Kurkdjian AC
    (1995) Role of the differentiation of root epidermal cells in Nod factor from Rhizobium meliloti-induced root-hair depolarization of Medicago sativa. Plant Physiol 107:783–790.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  33. ↵
    1. Küthreiber W,
    2. Jaffe LF
    (1990) Detection of extracellular calcium gradients with a calcium-specific vibrating probe. J Cell Biol 110:1565–1573.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Long SR
    (1996) Rhizobium symbiosis: Nod factors in perspective. Plant Cell 8:1885–1889.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Miller AL
    (1989) Ion currents and growth regulators in plant root development. Bio Bull 176(S):65–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Miller AL,
    2. Gow NAR
    (1989) Correlation between root generated ionic currents, pH, fusicoccin, IAA and growth of the primary root of Zea mays. Plant Physiol 89:1198–1206.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Miller DD,
    2. de Ruijter NC,
    3. Bisseling T,
    4. Emons AM
    (1999) The role of actin in root hair morphogenesis: studies with lipochito-oligosaccharides as a growth stimulator and cytochalasin as an actin perturbing drug. Plant J 17:141–154.
  38. ↵
    1. Miyawaki A,
    2. Griesbeck O,
    3. Heim R,
    4. Tsien RY
    (1999) Dynamic and quantitative Ca2+ measurements using improved cameleons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:2135–2140.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Peters WS,
    2. Felle HH
    (1999) The correlation of profiles of surface pH and elongation growth in maize roots. Plant Physiol 121:905–912.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Peterson MA,
    2. Barnes DK
    (1981) Inheritance of ineffective nodulation and non-nodulation traits in alfalfa. Crop Sci 21:611–616.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Pingret JL,
    2. Journet EP,
    3. Barker DG
    (1998) Rhizobium Nod factor signaling: evidence for a G protein-mediated transduction mechanism. Plant Cell 10:659–671.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Schiefelbein JW,
    2. Shipley A,
    3. Rowse P
    (1992) Calcium influx at the tip of growing root-hair cells of Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 187:455–459.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Schultze M,
    2. Kondorosi A
    (1998) Regulation of symbiotic root nodule development. Annu Rev Genet 32:33–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Schultze M,
    2. Quiclet-Sire B,
    3. Kondorosi E,
    4. Virelizier H,
    5. Glushka JN,
    6. Endre G,
    7. Gero SD,
    8. Kondorosi A
    (1992) Rhizobium meliloti produces a family of sulphated lipo-oligosaccharides exhibiting different degrees of the plant host specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:192–196.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Staehelin C,
    2. Granado J,
    3. Miller J,
    4. Wiemken A,
    5. Mellor RB
    (1994) Perception of Rhizobium nodulation factors by tomato cells and the inactivation by root chitinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:2196–2200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Vidali L,
    2. Yokota E,
    3. Cheung AY,
    4. Shimmen T,
    5. Hepler PK
    (1999) 135 kDa actin-bundling protein from Lilium longiflorum pollen is the plant homologue of villin. Protoplasma 209:283–291.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. ↵
    1. Weisenseel MH,
    2. Dorn A,
    3. Jaffe LF
    (1979) Natural H+ currents transverse growing roots and root hairs of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Plant Physiol 64:512–518.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Physiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ion Changes in Legume Root Hairs Responding to Nod Factors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Physiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Physiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Ion Changes in Legume Root Hairs Responding to Nod Factors
Luis Cárdenas, Terena L. Holdaway-Clarke, Federico Sánchez, Carmen Quinto, José A. Feijó, Joseph G. Kunkel, Peter K. Hepler
Plant Physiology Jun 2000, 123 (2) 443-452; DOI: 10.1104/pp.123.2.443

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Ion Changes in Legume Root Hairs Responding to Nod Factors
Luis Cárdenas, Terena L. Holdaway-Clarke, Federico Sánchez, Carmen Quinto, José A. Feijó, Joseph G. Kunkel, Peter K. Hepler
Plant Physiology Jun 2000, 123 (2) 443-452; DOI: 10.1104/pp.123.2.443
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Nod FACTORS CAUSE A DEPOLARIZATION OF THE MEMBRANE POTENTIAL
    • Nod FACTORS ALTER INTRACELLULAR AND EXTRACELLULAR pH
    • Nod FACTORS STIMULATE CHANGES IN THE INTRACELLULAR Ca2+ CONCENTRATION
    • Nod FACTORS INDUCE RAPID CHANGES IN EXTRACELLULAR Ca2+
    • CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK
    • Footnotes
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

Plant Physiology: 123 (2)
Plant Physiology
Vol. 123, Issue 2
Jun 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • The Arabidopsis 14-3-3 Family of Signaling Regulators
  • Role of Reactive Oxygen Intermediates and Cognate Redox Signaling in Disease Resistance
Show more UPDATE ON SIGNALING

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Physiology Preview
  • Archive
  • Focus Collections
  • Classic Collections
  • The Plant Cell
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Journal Miles
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire