- Copyright © 2000 American Society of Plant Physiologists
Plants have evolved a plethora of sophisticated defense mechanisms to resist their potential colonization by microbial pathogens and parasites. Preformed physical and chemical barriers constitute the first line of defense. Superimposed upon these is a battery of inducible responses, their engagement being dependent upon successful recognition of the invading pathogen (Hammond-Kosack and Jones, 1996). This exquisitely specific recognition event is thought to be mediated via the direct or indirect interaction between the product of a microbial avirulence (avr) gene and the corresponding plant disease resistance (R) gene product. This often results in the programmed execution of challenged host cells, producing a visible area of cell death, the hypersensitive response (HR), surrounding the site of attempted pathogen ingress (Dangl et al., 1996). Following HR formation is the establishment of immunity in systemic tissues to secondary infections termed systemic acquired resistance (SAR), which conveys protection against a broad spectrum of microbial pathogens.
One of the most rapid defense responses engaged following pathogen recognition is the so-called oxidative burst, which constitutes the production of reactive oxygen intermediates (ROIs), primarily superoxide (O2 −) and H2O2, at the site of attempted invasion (Apostol et al., 1989). In addition, nitric oxide (NO), a key signal molecule in animal cells, has also been shown to accumulate during HR formation. The emerging evidence suggests the oxidative burst and cognate redox signaling may play a central role in the integration of a diverse array of plant defense responses. Here we will review the recent advances in the generation, regulation, and function of the oxidative burst and the possible mechanisms underlying the transduction of cognate redox signals.
CHEMISTRY OF ROIs
The oxidative burst was first reported by Doke (1983), who demonstrated that potato tuber tissue generated O2 − following inoculation with an avirulent race of Phytophthora infestans. A virulent race of the same pathogen failed to engage O2 − production. Subsequently, O2 − generation has been identified in a diverse array of plant-pathogen interactions involving avirulent bacteria, fungi, and viruses. The production of ROIs is a double-edged sword because their concentration must be carefully regulated to avoid unwanted cellular cytotoxicity (Fig.1; Halliwell and Gutteridge, 1990). The half-life of O2 − is less than a second and is usually rapidly dismutated either nonenzymatically or via O2 − dismutase (SOD) to H2O2, which is relatively stable. Protonation of O2 − can produce the hydroperoxyl radical HO2 −, which can convert fatty acids to toxic lipid peroxides, destroying biological membranes. Moreover, in the presence of divalent metal ions such as Fe2+, H2O2 can undergo the Fenton reaction, producing the hydroxyl radical (OH·), the most reactive species known to chemistry. This ROI can initiate self-perpetuating lipid peroxidation and damage nucleic acids and proteins.
Key chemical reactions involving ROIs and NO in plants.
GENERATION OF ROIs
Following pathogen recognition, plants produce a biphasic oxidative burst (Fig. 2); the identity of the molecular machinery responsible, however, remains to be rigorously established. Recent evidence has implicated a number of possible mechanisms including a plasma membrane located NADPH-dependent oxidase (Groom et al., 1996; Keller et al., 1998), a cell wall peroxidase (Bolwell and Wojitaszek, 1997; McLusky et al., 1999), and apoplastic amine, diamine, and polyamine oxidase-type enzymes (Allan and Fluhr, 1997). Intracellular sources of ROI generation also exist and include the mitochondria, chloroplasts, and peroxisomes. Of these proposed mechanisms the NADPH-dependent oxidase system, similar to that present in mammalian neutrophils, has received the most attention. This complex is composed of an unusual b-type cytochrome with two subunits, p22phox and gp91phox (Segal and Abo, 1993). During neutrophil activation two cytosolic proteins, p67phox and p47phox, the latter following phosphorylation, also associate to complete formation of the holoenzyme. Patients with defects in the p22phox subunit possess a rare autosomal recessive condition termed chronic granulomatous disease manifested as a massively increased susceptibility to microbial infection. Genes homologous to gp91phox have been identified in rice and as a superfamily in Arabidopsis (Groom et al., 1996; Keller et al., 1998). Genes encoding the other components of this complex, however, have not been uncovered in plants. Thus it is becoming increasingly likely that the plant and animal NADPH oxidase complexes are regulated, at least in part, via different mechanisms. To confirm the composition of the plant holoenzyme, it will be important to functionally reconstitute the activity of this complex in vitro from its proposed composite proteins.
Biphasic accumulation of H2O2 during the plant oxidative burst in response to an avirulent or virulent microbial pathogen. Only phase II correlates with the establishment of disease resistance. Phase I is a non-specific response to a number of stress stimuli, including wounding.
Evidence has also been presented for the involvement of peroxidases in the generation of H2O2 during the oxidative burst. Peroxidase isoforms have been shown to produce H2O2 in vitro at an alkaline pH, which is characteristically found in the apoplast following pathogen recognition (Bolwell and Wojtaszek, 1997). Moreover, the directed secretion of peroxidases to sites of infection has also been demonstrated (McLusky et al., 1999). Other potential sources of ROIs include amine, diamine, and polyamine oxidases, which may generate apoplastic H2O2 in tobacco (Allan and Fluhr, 1997). In barley, a germin-like oxalate oxidase that generates H2O2 has been shown to accumulate during resistance to Erysiphe graminis f. sp.hordei, suggesting that alternative mechanisms of ROI generation could exist in monocots.
Therefore, a number of potential mechanisms have now been proposed for the origin of the oxidative burst. It is probable that some of these mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and in this context, simultaneous ROI production from independent sources has been demonstrated (Allan and Fluhr, 1997). Alternatively, some plant species may have evolved different methods of ROI generation or distinct mechanisms could be deployed against different microbial pathogens. The analysis of gene knockout or antisense Arabidopsis lines is now urgently required to critically assess the potential role of these ROI generating systems in the oxidative burst against a range of microbial pathogens.
GENERATION OF NO
NO is a key signal in the immune, nervous and vascular system of animals and is produced by the action of NO synthase (NOS). In mammals there are three classes of NOS, which are complex P450 enzymes that require NADPH, FAD, FMN, and tetrahydrobiopterin for their activity. A number of recent observations have suggested NO may play an important role in the establishment of plant disease resistance. Thus NO has been shown to accumulate during incompatible, but not compatible, plant-pathogen interactions, and pharmacological inhibitors of NOS have been shown to ameliorate the establishment of plant disease resistance (Delledonne et al., 1998). Moreover, the transient accumulation of NO in tobacco plants via the injection of mammalian NOS elaborated resistance against a previously virulent strain of tobacco mosaic virus (Durner et al., 1998). To date, however, a plant gene encoding NOS has not been identified. There are alternative mechanisms for NO generation in addition to NOS. Respiration, denitrification, and nitrogen fixation can all produce NO as a by-product derived from NO2 accumulation, either nonenzymatically or via nitrate reductase activity. If a candidate NOS gene remains elusive, the biochemical purification of the enzyme responsible for NO production during the establishment of disease resistance will become an important future goal in this area.
REGULATORY MECHANISMS MODULATING ROI PRODUCTION
Due to the highly cytotoxic and reactive nature of ROIs, their accumulation must be under tight control (Fig.3). Studies employing pharmacological agents have shown the plant oxidative burst to be regulated, at least in part, by a phosphorylation/dephosphorylation poise (Levine et al., 1994). Phospholipases are thought to be intimately involved in the activation of the mammalian NADPH oxidase complex, which prompted studies to investigate if these enzymes have a similar function in plants. No role for phospholipase D has been identified, which is particularly important in mammals. However, inhibitors of phospholipase A have been shown to blunt the oxidative burst in tobacco suspension cells in response to specific recognition of the Cf-9 elicitor ofCladosporium fulvum (Piedras et al., 1998). Moreover, a role for phospholipase C-mediated production of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate in engagement of the plant oxidative burst has also been proposed (Legendre et al., 1993). These observations are particularly pertinent because two Arabidopsis genes, designated PAD4 andEDS1, which are required for resistance against virulent and avirulent pathogens, respectively, have been shown to encode products with homology to phospholipases (Falk et al., 1999; Jirage et al., 1999). However, a potential role for these proteins in the modulation of the oxidative burst remains to be investigated.
Schematic model for engagement of the NADPH oxidase-dependent oxidative burst in plants. Pathogen recognition results in an influx of Ca2+, which may activate both the production of NADPH via NAD kinase and the translocation of p67phox and p47phox from the cytosol to the plasma membrane. Moreover, Ca2+ may also activate gp91phox directly, by binding to the two EF hand motifs present in this protein, or indirectly via phosphorylation, following the Ca2+-mediated activation of a specific CDPK. The small GTP-binding protein, p21rac, may also make an important contribution to the activation of the NADPH oxidase complex.
A striking feature of the plant homolog of gp91phox, designated rbohA, is the presence of an extended amino terminus, which is followed by two Ca2+-binding (EF) hand motifs, suggesting Ca2+ may play an important role in the regulation of NADPH oxidase activity (Keller et al., 1998). Structural predictions of rbohA suggest that the two EF hand motifs are located within the cytosol. The rapid accumulation of cytosolic Ca2+in responses to elicitors and avirulent pathogens has been well documented (Zimmermann et al., 1997; Xu and Heath, 1998). Thus Ca2+ release following pathogen recognition may drive a conformation change in rbohA leading to transient O2 − production. Recent evidence has also been presented suggesting that Ca2+ may modulate the NADPH oxidase complex via a more indirect route. NAD kinase catalyzes the final step in the production of NADPH and the activity of this enzyme is dependent on the Ca2+-binding protein, calmodulin. Transgenic plants containing a constitutively active synthetic calmodulin have been generated and shown to possess increased basal and induced levels of NADPH in response to elicitor treatment, resulting in elevated levels of ROI production (Harding et al., 1997). Hence, Ca2+ may also regulate the NADPH oxidase complex indirectly by elevating the concentration of available NADPH via modulation of NAD kinase activity.
Biochemical studies of the human NADPH oxidase complex have identified two further cognate proteins: the small GTP-binding protein p21rac and the GDP-dissociation inhibitor factor rhoGDI. Thus GTP-binding and its subsequent hydrolysis to GDP may play an important role in modulating O2 − production. Recently, a number of rice genes have been identified as homologs of human p21rac and dominant gain-of-function and dominant negative forms of one such gene, designated OsRac1, have been expressed in rice cell cultures and transgenic plants. It is intriguing that expression of constitutively active OsRac1resulted in the production of ROI, whereas expression of the dominant negative form ameliorated ROI generation (Kawasaki et al., 1999). Hence, OsRac1 may function to modulate the oxidative burst in rice by regulating the activity of an NADPH oxidase complex.
The active movement of the p47phox and p67phox components of the NADPH oxidase complex from the cytosol to the plasma membrane is thought to be a key point of regulation in neutrophils. Antibodies raised against these proteins, which cross-react with proteins of a similar mass in plants, have been employed to show a similar translocation of these proteins. This process is thought to occur in response to race-specific elicitors of the tomato leaf mold pathogen C. fulvum (Xing et al., 1997). In animals, phosphorylation of these proteins has been proposed to initiate their translocation to the plasma membrane. In neutrophils, protein kinase C is thought to phosphorylate these proteins, whereas in tomato this process may be mediated via a Ca2+-dependent protein kinase (CDPK; Xing et al., 1997).
Unfortunately, plant gene homologs encoding p47phox and p67phox have yet to be uncovered. In this context an alternative mechanism for the activation of the plant NADPH oxidase independent of these proteins has been proposed. The R gene-dependent activation of a CDPK that functions upstream of the oxidative burst has recently been reported (Romeis et al., 2000). Although the molecular target of this CDPK remains enigmatic, it may phosphorylate the plant NADPH oxidase, as this protein possesses CDPK phosphorylation signature sites. Hence, this kinase may directly contribute to the activation of NADPH oxidase activity (Fig. 3).
Mechanisms regulating the production of ROIs via the modulation of cell wall-associated peroxidase activity are also now beginning to emerge. Peroxidase isoforms have been isolated that actively produce H2O2 in vitro at an alkaline pH (Bolwell and Wojtaszek, 1997). This is an important criterion, because following pathogen recognition, there is a rapid alkalization of the apoplast. Hence, an increase in apoplastic pH, mediated via plasma membrane ion channels, could engage the activity of the relevant peroxidase isoforms driving the production of H2O2. The delivery of substrate(s) to the apoplast may provide another powerful mechanism for the regulation of peroxidase-dependent ROI production, although the existence of such a regulatory mechanism remains to be established. A recent study has highlighted the possible colocalization of peroxidase activity and H2O2 accumulation atBotrytis allii infection sites in onion epidermal cells (McLusky et al., 1999). The directed secretion of peroxidases to sites of attempted pathogen infection could thus provide an elegant mechanism for regulating peroxidase-dependent ROI generation. Finally, like the NADPH oxidase complex, the activation of apoplastic peroxidase activity may also be coupled to Ca2+ fluxes, as Ca2+ is required for optimal enzyme activity.
ROI-MEDIATED OXIDATIVE CROSS-LINKING
The plant cell wall is a dynamic molecular machine comprised of a complex structure of polysaccharides, phenolic compounds, and structural proteins. One of the most rapid defensive strategies identified to date is the oxidative cross-linking of cell wall structural proteins, which is initiated within 2 to 5 min in elicitor-treated soybean and bean cells (Bradley et al., 1992). The accumulation of extracellular H2O2 following the oxidative burst has been proposed to drive the formation of protein cross-links, thereby strengthening the resistance of this key physical barrier against attempted pathogen penetration. The molecular nature of the cross-links responsible for the rapid insolubilization of these proteins remains unclear. Isodityrosine, an oxidatively coupled dimer of Tyr, could be generated quickly and could elaborate cross-linking. Interpolypeptide isodityrosine is therefore a strong candidate for this covalent cross-link. Unfortunately, analysis of soluble oligopeptides released from the cell wall by protease digestion has identified only intrapolypeptide loops of isodityrosine. More recently, however, evidence has been presented that di-isodityrosine, a novel tetrameric derivative of Tyr, may constitute this intermolecular cross-link (Brady and Fry, 1997).
In addition to driving the cross-linking of cell wall structural proteins, ROIs generated from the oxidative burst may also cross-link cell wall-bound phenolics. Polysaccharides with ester-linked feruloyl side chains are abundant in the plant cell wall. In the Gramineae, feruloyl groups are predominantly attached to Ara side chains of arabinoxylans. The production of diferuloyl groups may act as covalent cross-links between polysaccharide chains within the cell wall, thereby strengthening cell wall structure. Recently, evidence has been presented that H2O2accumulation may elaborate the extraprotoplastic oxidative coupling of polysaccharide-bound feruloyl residues (Fry et al., 2000). Hence, the oxidative burst may also drive the cross-linking of polysaccharide chains within the cell wall, thus strengthening this physical barrier against attempted pathogen ingress.
FUNCTION OF ROIs IN HR FORMATION
ROIs generated via the oxidative burst have been proposed to play a central role in the development of host cell death during the HR. The deployment of antioxidant enzymes or scavengers has been shown to blunt the development of cell death during a number of incompatible plant-pathogen interactions. Moreover, the inhibition of endogenous antioxidant mechanisms using specific and non-specific pharmacological agents, thus increasing the concentration of ROIs, resulted in elevated levels of host cell death (Levine et al., 1994). These observations have more recently been extended to include experiments employing antisense technology to suppress the expression of key antioxidant genes. Thus transgenic plants with reduced amounts of catalase activity, which catalyzes the decomposition of H2O2, accumulate increased levels of ROIs and develop HR-like lesions when exposed to high light intensities (Chamnongpol et al., 1998). This phenomenon probably reflects a bona fide defense response because gene expression analysis has demonstrated the presence of transcripts from key defense marker genes. In this context, the pivotal defense metabolite salicylic acid (SA) has been postulated to both inhibit the activity of some antioxidant enzymes and potentiate the production of NADPH oxidase-dependent O2 − via a positive feedback loop (for review, see Van Camp et al., 1998).
ROIs may also mediate the induction of a cytoplasmic Ca2+ influx during the establishment of disease resistance. Elegant studies of the interactions of cowpea with the rust fungus Uromyces vignae identified a prolonged elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ during resistant, but not susceptible responses, suggesting a key role for cytoplasmic Ca2+ in HR development (Xu and Heath, 1998). Recent studies have begun to highlight a role for H2O2 in the initiation of this Ca2+ influx. The deployment of fluorescence ratio imaging techniques has shown that H2O2 accumulation results in a dose-dependent increase of cytoplasmic Ca2+(Levine et al., 1996). This dramatic increase in cytoplasmic Ca2+ was subsequently shown to be an important factor in the development of ROI-mediated cell death. Moreover, specific inhibitors of Ca2+ channels, which block Ca2+ entry, blunted the development of cell death in soybean cells, mediated by either Pseudomonas syringae pv glycinea or H2O2. The location of this Ca2+ pool is presumably extracellular because the addition of Ca2+ ionophores, which open Ca2+ channels, were sufficient to invoke cell death in the presence, but not absence, of extracellular Ca2+. Thus an ROI-stimulated Ca2+ influx is a key determinant in HR development and may reflect a requirement for Ca2+ in the activation of cell death effectors.
Genetic evidence for the involvement of ROIs in the HR has been provided by studies employing the recessive lsd1 lesion mimic mutant of Arabidopsis. The accumulation of O2 − preceded the onset of cell death and the local accumulation of O2 −, but not H2O2 in lsd1 was sufficient to initiate the development of runaway cell death in this mutant (Jabs et al., 1996). Thus runaway cell death in lsd1plants probably reflects abnormal accumulation of O2 − and an inability to respond to signals derived from it. lsd1 has been shown to encode a zinc finger transcription factor and may function by monitoring a O2 −-dependent signal and negatively regulating a cell death pathway. Recently, some of the targets of lsd1 gene function have begun to emerge;lsd1 has been shown to be required for the induction of CuZnSOD in response to SA accumulation (Kliebenstein, et al., 1999). Thus the runaway cell death phenotype in lsd1 probably reflects the accumulation of O2 − to a critical threshold concentration, due to a reduction in CuZnSOD activity, which engages the mechanism(s) underlying runaway cell death in this mutant. However, it is currently unclear how this mechanism operates because O2 − production is presumed to be extracellular and the target CuZnSOD intracellular. Furthermore, O2 − will not typically cross biological membranes due to its inherent charge.
The first suspicions that ROIs may not be sufficient for the complete host cell death response came from experiments employing a battery ofP. syringae pv syringae hrp gene mutants. This gene cluster encodes a type III secretory system, conserved among gram-negative plant pathogenic bacteria, which may function as a conduit for the delivery of microbial AVR proteins directly into plant cells. Mutation of the hrmA gene within this cluster, which encodes a regulatory function, decreased the development of cell death in tobacco suspension cells, but had no impact on the magnitude of the oxidative burst (Glazener et al., 1996). In contrast, mutations in the remaining genes within this cluster abolished both responses. Data supporting these observations has recently emerged from studies of the oxidative burst engaged by tomato suspension cultures in response to the AVR9 elicitor of C. fulvum. A substantial increase in the level of ROIs was measured in this system, but no cell death was detected (Piedras et al., 1998). Thus ROIs generated via the oxidative burst may not be sufficient for the complete host cell death response during the development of the HR, at least in cell suspension cultures, suggesting other mechanisms may contribute to this cellular execution process.
Recent evidence has suggested that NO may make a pivotal contribution to HR formation. In this context NO has been shown to potentiate ROI-mediated induction of cell death in soybean cells (Delledonne et al., 1998). Thus ROIs may function in combination with NO to drive the development of host cell death during the formation of the HR, possibly after reacting together to form highly toxic peroxynitrite (ONOO−). However, the identity of the agent(s) that directly execute plant cells still remains to be rigorously established.
ROI SIGNAL FUNCTION IN SAR
A potential role for local ROI accumulation in systemic signaling leading to the establishment of SAR was highlighted by an elegant series of experiments in transgenic tobacco plants, which contained an antisense catalase gene (Chamnongpol et al., 1998). Exposure of these plants to high light levels for 2 d resulted in visible necrosis and induced pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins in adjacent, light-shielded, local, and systemic leaf tissues. In contrast, exposure to high light levels for 4 h induced PR proteins in adjacent, light-shielded local, but not systemic tissue, in the absence of necrosis. Thus the ROI-mediated activation of SAR genes could be uncoupled from cell death in local tissues. However, local ROI-mediated cell death was necessary for the accumulation of PR proteins in systemic tissues.
Studies employing Arabidopsis have placed similar observations in a more biological context (Alvarez et al., 1998). Engagement of a local oxidative burst in response to an avirulent isolate of P. syringae pv tomato-induced “microbursts” in systemic leaf tissue. These microbursts drove the formation of “micro-HRs,” which preceded the establishment of SAR. Co-infiltration of the NADPH oxidase inhibitor, diphenylene iodinium, with avirulent P. syringae pv tomato ameliorated engagement of a local oxidative burst and blocked the formation of systemic microbursts and the development of SAR. In the corresponding gain-of-function experiment local infiltration of an H2O2-generating system induced systemic microbursts and subsequently SAR. Hence, an ROI-mediated systemic signaling network may also mediate the establishment of plant immunity. ROI accumulation may, therefore, integrate a plethora of local and systemic defense responses (Fig.4).
Functional integration of defense responses by ROIs during the establishment of plant disease resistance. BA2H, Benzoic acid 2-hydroxylase; pal, Phe ammonia lyase; GSH/GSSG, reduced and oxidized forms of glutathione, respectively.
ROI-MEDIATED REDOX SIGNALING
Redox signaling mediated via ROIs is thought to be effected by the oxidation of nucleophilic centers or coordinate interactions with transition metals strategically located at either the allosteric or active sites of target proteins, resulting in a modulation of their activity (Stamler, 1994). More exotic redox switches may also include production of the less oxidized forms of Cys, such as sulfenic and sulfinic acids, whose formation is also reversible. Thus ROIs signal functions are manifested as a consequence of their ability to act as mobile carriers of an unpaired electron. In animals there is compelling evidence for both direct and indirect mechanisms for the regulation of gene expression in response to changes in cellular redox status. In response to severe hyperoxic states key Cys residues of redox modulated transcription factors may become oxidized, effecting changes in the expression profile of their target genes. HoxB5, a member of the mammalian homeodomain gene family and Sp-1, a zinc finger protein, are examples of transcription factors that are positively and negatively regulated by oxidation respectively (Galang and Hauser, 1993; Wu et al., 1996).
In contrast, signal transmission in response to lower levels of ROIs may require the action of specific protein kinases. In animal cells ROIs have been shown to engage specific mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades (Klotz et al., 1999). The emerging evidence suggests that MAPKs will play an important role in the establishment of plant disease resistance. For example, in parsley, a cytosolic MAPK has been shown to translocate to the nucleus in response to a fungal elicitor, where it may phosphorylate target transcription factors (Ligterink et al., 1997). However, this MAPK is thought to act independently or upstream of the oxidative burst. More recently, ROIs have been shown to mediate the expression of redox responsive defense genes via the engagement of an alternative MAPK module (J. J. Grant and G. J. Loake, unpublished observations). Hence, significant parallels may exist in the transduction of stress induced redox cues between plants and animals.
REDOX SIGNALING VIA NO
Superimposed upon ROI signal function during HR formation is redox signaling mediated via NO and reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNIs). The preferred targets of NO are proteins containing iron (II) porphyrins, such as heme. The prototypic target in animals is guanylate cyclase, which elicits many cellular responses to NO via the secondary messenger cyclic GMP (cGMP), including vasorelaxation and inhibition of platelet aggregation (Stamler, 1994). During the establishment of plant disease resistance, NO production is also thought to activate this key enzyme, leading to increased levels of cGMP, which may function as a downstream messenger activating the expression of key plant defense genes including PR1, in an SA-dependent manner (Durner et al., 1998).
NO has also been shown to regulate the generation of animal prostaglandins, lipid-based signals produced during the inflammatory response, by modulating the activity of cyclooxygenase (Salvemini et al., 1993). A plant homolog of cyclooxygenase designated PIOX has recently been isolated from tobacco (Sanz et al., 1998). Therefore, NO may regulate lipid signal function during the HR via a similar mechanism. It is interesting that the expression of PIOX is activated by pathogens and ROIs. However, the impact of ROIs or RNIs, if any, on the activity of the corresponding gene product remains to be determined.
ROI AND NO REGULATORY INTERPLAY
The interactions between ROIs and NO during the establishment of disease resistance is likely to be complex. Conceptually, various positive and negative regulatory functions based on this interplay could be built into the underlying signaling circuitry. For example, NO antagonizes the action of O2 −, driving its activity away from metal clusters toward sulfhydryl groups, which are the preferred targets of OONO−, formed from NO and O2 −. It is intriguing that the O2 −-producing NADPH oxidase may be a target for inactivation by NO during HR formation. In neutrophils, the activity of this oxidase is blunted by NO accumulation, decreasing tissue inflammation (Clancy et al., 1992). Thus NO inhibition of O2 − production during the establishment of disease resistance may function to limit the extent of cell death mediated via the production of OONO−. Conversely, NO is known to function as a potent activator of p21ras G-proteins, possibly by inducing an S-nitrosylation-induced conformational change, promoting the rate-limiting release of GDP (Lander et al., 1993). Hence, NO could activate OsRac1, theras-related plant homolog of p21rac1, the G-protein associated with the NADPH oxidase complex, driving the formation of O2 −. This apparent regulatory conflict could be reconciled if the modulation of these redox switches was temporally resolved during HR formation via their differing sensitivities to NO. This regulatory mechanism could be amplified further, because both catalase and γ-glutamylcysteinyl synthetase, which catalyzes a key step in glutathione biosynthesis, a pivotal antioxidant, are both known to be targets for NO inactivation in animals (Halliwell and Gutteridge, 1990). Disabling these antioxidant systems in plants during HR formation would presumably further increase ROI levels. Finally, NOS itself is a P450 enzyme and would consequently be a potential target for NO inactivation, possibly during the later stages of a resistant response. Inactivation of NOS could therefore function as a further brake on lesion development. Unraveling the interplay between ROIs and NO in the context of redox signal transduction should provide significant insights into the establishment of plant disease resistance.
CONCLUSIONS
The emerging evidence suggests ROIs and NO integrate a plethora of diverse defense responses during the establishment of localR gene-mediated resistance and the development of systemic immunity. However, a number of fundamentally important questions remain unanswered. The mechanism of ROI generation still remains to be rigorously established. In this context the analysis of knockouts and antisense plants defective in the activity of isoforms of RbohA and specific cell wall-associated peroxidases should shed light on this question. Moreover, although there is compelling evidence for NO function in disease resistance, to date, no genes encoding either NOS, guanylate cyclase, or the cognate phosphodiesterase responsible for cGMP degradation have been identified. Our appreciation of the complex interplay between ROIs and NO still remains at a rudimentary level and advances in this area are likely to represent a formidable task. However, the ground has been broken by data suggesting that the synergistic interaction of these molecules mediates host cell execution. Although the targets of NO are known or can be speculated, the signal functions of ROIs are only just beginning to emerge. As our appreciation of the underlying biology increases, we anticipate that significant insights will emerge for the development of novel strategies for disease control based on the manipulation of the oxidative burst and the cognate redox signaling network.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank our colleagues for communicating results prior to publication.
Footnotes
- Received February 15, 2000.
- Accepted April 17, 2000.