Skip to main content

Main menu

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
OtherUPDATE ON SUGAR SENSING
You have accessRestricted Access

Plant Sugar-Response Pathways. Part of a Complex Regulatory Web

Susan I. Gibson
Susan I. Gibson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published December 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.124.4.1532

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Idealized model of sugar-analog metabolism. Arrows indicate different steps in transport and metabolism of sugar analogs. Crosses through arrows indicate that, according to the idealized model (shown in blue), the indicated compounds do not progress through that step. Selected exceptions to the idealized model are shown in red and italicized. “1” refers to reference by Stoop and Pharr (1993). “2” refers to reference by Komor et al. (1985).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Effects of high concentrations of exogenous sugar on seedling development. Wild-type ArabidopsIs seedlings were grown on the indicated media for 16 d prior to photographing. The red bars indicate 2 mm.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Models for inhibition of early seedling development by Glc and ABA. Glc and ABA may inhibit seed germination and early seedling development via one of the following mechanisms, or by a combination of two or more of them. A, Glc and ABA may act in the same pathway, with ABA acting first. B, Glc and ABA may act in the same pathway, with Glc acting first. C, Glc and ABA may act via converging pathways. D, Glc and ABA may act via completely independent pathways.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table I.

    Sugar-response mutants and corresponding loci

    MutantsOriginal SelectionLociReferences
    rsr Reduced sensitivity to Suc induction of patatin expression Martin et al., 1997
    lba Reduced sensitivity to Suc induction of β-amylase expression Mita et al., 1997b
    hba Increased sensitivity to Suc induction of β-amylase expression Mita et al., 1997a
    sun Reduced sensitivity to Suc repression of plastocyanin expression sun6 Is allelic to abi4 Dijkwel et al., 1997; Huijser et al., 2000
    sis Reduced sensitivity to Glc or Suc-mediated inhibition of early seedling development sis1 Is allelic toctr1sis4 Is allelic toaba2sis5 Is allelic to aba4 Laby et al., 2000; S. Gibson, R. Laby, and D. Kim, unpublished data
    gin Reduced sensitivity to Glc-mediated inhibition of early seedling development gin1 Is allelic to aba2gin6 Is allelic toabi4 Zhou et al., 1998; Arenas-Huertero et al., 2000; J. Sheen, personal communication
    prl Increased sensitivity to sugar-mediated inhibition of early seedling development PRL1 Encodes a WD-40 protein Németh et al., 1998; Bhalerao et al., 1999
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Physiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Plant Sugar-Response Pathways. Part of a Complex Regulatory Web
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Physiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Physiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Plant Sugar-Response Pathways. Part of a Complex Regulatory Web
Susan I. Gibson
Plant Physiology Dec 2000, 124 (4) 1532-1539; DOI: 10.1104/pp.124.4.1532

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Plant Sugar-Response Pathways. Part of a Complex Regulatory Web
Susan I. Gibson
Plant Physiology Dec 2000, 124 (4) 1532-1539; DOI: 10.1104/pp.124.4.1532
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • USE OF SUGAR ANALOGS TO CHARACTERIZE PLANT SUGAR RESPONSES AND RESPONSE PATHWAYS
    • WHICH SUGAR ANALOGS ARE REALLY “NON-METABOLIZABLE”?
    • DO HEXOKINASES ACT AS SENSORS?
    • SNF1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASES ACT AS “METABOLIC SENSORS”
    • IDENTIFYING SUGAR-RESPONSE MUTANTS
    • MANY SUGAR-RESPONSE MUTANTS ARE OSMO-TOLERANT
    • MANY SUGAR-RESPONSE MUTANTS ARE ALSO DEFECTIVE IN PHYTOHORMONE RESPONSE OR METABOLISM
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

Plant Physiology: 124 (4)
Plant Physiology
Vol. 124, Issue 4
Dec 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Physiology Preview
  • Archive
  • Focus Collections
  • Classic Collections
  • The Plant Cell
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Journal Miles
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire