Skip to main content

Main menu

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticlePLANTS INTERACTING WITH OTHER ORGANISMS
You have accessRestricted Access

Wound-Inducible Proteinase Inhibitors in Pepper. Differential Regulation upon Wounding, Systemin, and Methyl Jasmonate

Daniel S. Moura, Clarence A. Ryan
Daniel S. Moura
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clarence A. Ryan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published May 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.126.1.289

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    PLPIs separation on C-18 RP-HPLC. One-fourth of the inhibitors eluted from the chymotrypsin affinity column was loaded into the C-18 column and eluted with a gradient of 0% to 40% (v/v) acetonitrile in 0.1% (v/v) TFA for 50 min. The seven major peaks were eluted at approximately 34, 35, 40, 41, 43, 45, and 46 min and were purified to homogeneity using a combination of C-18 RP-HPLC and SCX-HPLC.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    SDS/urea-PAGE of the seven purified PLPIs. Fifteen micrograms of each PLPI was loaded on the gel. The gel was silver stained and part of the gel containing the lanes with PLPIs 43, 45, and 46 was developed longer.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Titration of chymotrypsin and trypsin by each purified PLPI. Trypsin and chymotrypsin activities were measured spectrophotometrically in the presence of increasing amounts of the inhibitors. ●, Chymotrypsin activity. ▵, Trypsin activity.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Sequence alignment of the PLPIs. A, Alignment of PLPIs 34, 35, 40, 45, and 46 with the GenBank accession no. AF221097. B, Alignment of PLPIs 34, 35, 40, 41, and 43 with the GenBank accession number AF039398. C, Alignment of deduced proteins from tobacco stigma inhibitors II precursor (GenBank accession no. JQ2153), tomato inhibitor II (GenBank accession no. P05119), and pepper (GenBank accession nos. AF221097 and AF039398) signal sequences were omitted for clarity. Reactive sites are indicated by amino acids in bold and conserved cysteines are indicated by bars between sequences.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Wound-inducibility of PLPIs in pepper leaves. Pepper plants were wounded with a hemostat across the midvein and in three different locations along the borders of the lower leaf. Tissues were collected at times indicated and leaf juice was extracted for PLPI evaluation. PLPIs levels were evaluated using immunodiffusion assay. Six plants were used for each time point evaluated. ♦, Wounded plants. ▪, Control plants.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Analyses of PLPI protein levels in eight different varieties of pepper. Each variety was wounded with a hemostat across the midvein and in three different locations along the lower leaf. PLPI protein levels of the wounded plants (black bars) and untreated plants (white bars) were evaluated by radial immunodiffusion. The results are the average of 12 plants.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Gel-blot analyses of PLPI mRNA induction in control plants and upon wounding. Cotyledons and leaves were harvested at the times indicated and were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction. Fifteen micrograms of total RNA was loaded and separated on a 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel. The RNA was salt transferred to nylon membranes that were used for hybridization with DNA probes. 18S rRNA was used as loading control.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Gel-blot analyses of PLPI mRNA induction in systemin (A), water (B), and MeJ-treated plants (C). Cotyledons and leaves were harvested at the times indicated and were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction. Fifteen micrograms of total RNA was loaded and separated on a 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel. The RNA was salt transferred to nylon membranes that were used for hybridization with DNA probes. 18S rRNA was used as loading control.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table I.

    Pepper proteinase inhibitor proteins table of purification

    Purification StepsVolumeProteinInhibitorsActivitySpecific Activity
    mL mg CUI1-a CUI1-a/mg protein
    Crude extract3,3002,42554.7440,000182
    Ammonium sulfate precipitation.1,6202,28453.3438,000192
    Heat treatment + dialysis2,11052738.7298,000566
    Chymotrypsin affinity column903636.0259,0007,194
    HPLC of most abundant inhibitors3.39.949.94
    • ↵F1-a  CUI, Chymotrypsin units inhibited.

    • View popup
    Table II.

    Quantities obtained for each PLPI after using C-18 RP-HPLC and SCX-HPLC purification

    PLPI Retention Time on C-18 RP-HPLCInhibitor ProteinPercent
    min mg
    342.2723
    351.8719
    402.8730
    410.969
    430.646
    450.485
    460.858
    • View popup
    Table III.

    Characteristics of the isolated PLPIs

    Inhibitor Retention TimeN-Terminal Sequence3-aMassInhibitor of ChymotrypsinInhibitor of TrypsinKiChymotrypsinKi Trypsin
    min D m
    34 RICTNCCAGRKGCNYYSADG 5,646YesYes8 × 10−11 5 × 10−9
    35 .................... 5,671YesYes3 × 10−10 4 × 10−9
    40 .................... 5,681YesNo1 × 10−10 –
    41 AKEP................ 5,952YesNo6 × 10−10 –
    43 EP.................. 5,755YesNo7 × 10−10 –
    45 .L.................. 5,716YesYes1 × 10−9 1 × 10−8
    46 .L.................. 5,586YesYes3 × 10−10 6 × 10−9
    • ↵F3-a  A dot represents an amino acid identical to PLPI 34.

    • View popup
    Table IV.

    Effects of MeJ, systemin, and salicylic acid (SA) on the induction of PLPIs

    Treatments4-aInhibitor Level4-b
    μg/mL
    MeJ84 ± 8
    Systemin60 ± 8
    Water/Buffer49 ± 16
    Untreated34 ± 5
    SA33 ± 4
    SA +Wounding30 ± 4
    • ↵F4-a  Control plants for systemin and SA treatment were supplied with water or buffer, control plants for MeJ were left undisturbed, untreated. Pepper leaves were harvested 24 h after the experiments started and PLPI levels were evaluated by radial immunodiffusion assay.

    • ↵F4-b  Average of six plants for each treatment. Treatments with the same letter do not differ statistically at the significance level of 0.05 (Duncan, 1955).

PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Physiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Wound-Inducible Proteinase Inhibitors in Pepper. Differential Regulation upon Wounding, Systemin, and Methyl Jasmonate
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Physiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Physiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Wound-Inducible Proteinase Inhibitors in Pepper. Differential Regulation upon Wounding, Systemin, and Methyl Jasmonate
Daniel S. Moura, Clarence A. Ryan
Plant Physiology May 2001, 126 (1) 289-298; DOI: 10.1104/pp.126.1.289

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Wound-Inducible Proteinase Inhibitors in Pepper. Differential Regulation upon Wounding, Systemin, and Methyl Jasmonate
Daniel S. Moura, Clarence A. Ryan
Plant Physiology May 2001, 126 (1) 289-298; DOI: 10.1104/pp.126.1.289
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

Plant Physiology: 126 (1)
Plant Physiology
Vol. 126, Issue 1
May 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • Control of Tobacco mosaic virus Movement Protein Fate by CELL-DIVISION-CYCLE Protein48
  • 14-3-3 Proteins SGF14c and SGF14l Play Critical Roles during Soybean Nodulation
  • Medicago truncatula ERN Transcription Factors: Regulatory Interplay with NSP1/NSP2 GRAS Factors and Expression Dynamics throughout Rhizobial Infection
Show more PLANTS INTERACTING WITH OTHER ORGANISMS

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Physiology Preview
  • Archive
  • Focus Collections
  • Classic Collections
  • The Plant Cell
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Journal Miles
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire