Skip to main content

Main menu

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleCELL BIOLOGY AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
You have accessRestricted Access

Single-Cell Measurements of the Contributions of Cytosolic Na+ and K+ to Salt Tolerance

David E. Carden, David J. Walker, Timothy J. Flowers, Anthony J. Miller
David E. Carden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Walker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy J. Flowers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony J. Miller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published February 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.011445

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • Copyright © 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists

Abstract

Ion concentrations in the roots of two barley (Hordeum vulgare) varieties that differed in NaCl tolerance were compared after exposure to NaCl. Triple-barreled H+-, K+-, and Na+-selective microelectrodes were used to measure cytosolic activities of the three ions after 5 and 8 d of NaCl stress. In both varieties of barley, it was only possible to record successfully from root cortical cells because the epidermal cells appeared to be damaged. The data show that from the 1st d of full NaCl stress, there were differences in the way in which the two varieties responded. At 5 d, the tolerant variety maintained a 10-fold lower cytosolic Na+ than the more sensitive variety, although by 8 d the two varieties were not significantly different. At this time, the more tolerant variety was better at maintaining root cytosolic K+ in the high-NaCl background than was the more sensitive variety. In contrast to earlier work on K+-starved barley (Walker et al., 1996), there was no acidification of the cytosol associated with the decreased cytosolic K+ activity during NaCl stress. These single-cell measurements of cytosolic and vacuolar ion activities allow calculation of thermodynamic gradients that can be used to reveal (or predict) the type of active transporters at both the plasma membrane and tonoplast.

In plant cells, maintaining cytosolic K+ in an environment with a high Na+ concentration is a key factor in determining the ability to tolerate salinity (Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999). In the cytosol, K+ is an essential activator for some enzymes and Na+ rarely substitutes for this biochemical function (Wyn Jones and Pollard, 1983; Flowers and Dalmond, 1992). Na+ can compete directly for K+-binding sites on enzymes, suggesting that the cytosolic K+ to Na+ ratio, rather than the absolute Na+ concentration, is critical for tolerance. Although the relationship between the cytosolic concentrations of Na+ and K+ is of fundamental importance in understanding the response of a plant to salinity, it is difficult to obtain direct measurements of the cytosolic concentrations of these two ions in plant cells.

Most crop plants are NaCl sensitive, although cereals show a range of tolerance, with barley (Hordeum vulgare) considered more tolerant than wheat (Triticum aestivum) or rice (Oryza sativa; Downton, 1984). Some barley varieties can complete their life cycle growing in 125 mm NaCl, even sustaining a 50% loss in biomass (Greenway, 1962). In a recent survey of NaCl sensitivity among barley genotypes, two varieties were identified that are representative examples from either end of the tolerance range of the species: the sensitive Triumph and the tolerant Gerbel (Flowers and Hajibagheri, 2001). The more sensitive variety accumulated more Na+ in the shoot than the tolerant variety and the authors suggested that this might reflect a more sensitive cultivar, having a higher concentration of Na+ in its cytoplasm than a more resistant variety. However, for roots growing for 15 d in 200 mm NaCl, the mean cytoplasmic Na+ concentration, estimated by x-ray microanalysis, was almost 1.4 times greater in Triumph than that in Gerbel although the differences were not significantly different (Flowers and Hajibagheri, 2001). Estimating ion activities from x-ray microanalyses requires a number of assumptions, including the approximation of cytosolic water content. The use of ion-selective microelectrodes precludes the need for such assumptions. Ion-selective microelectrode measurements in barley root cells have shown that the homeostasis of cytosolic K+ breaks down during K+ deficiency and this change is associated with an acidification of the cytosol (Walker et al., 1996, 1998). Here, we report using ion-selective microelectrode measurements to compare Na+ and K+ homeostasis in root cells of Triumph and Gerbel during NaCl stress.

Recently, a new type of Na+-selective microelectrode was reported (Carden et al., 2001) and we have used this tool to investigate the hypothesis that toxicity occurs as Na+ replaces K+ in the cytosol, and that there may be similarities to cellular responses to K+ deficiency. This new information has also enabled the thermodynamic feasibility of various cellular transport mechanisms for Na+ and K+to be calculated. These cell measurements show how this method has broader application for the analysis of plants, including Arabidopsis mutants with altered expression or regulation of transporters.

RESULTS

Triple-barreled microelectrode measurements of root cortical cells were made in young barley seedlings treated with 200 mmNaCl. For both varieties of barley, growth in 200 mm NaCl and 0.1 mm K+ eventually ceased, showing that NaCl tolerance under these conditions was a matter of differing survival times. During the first 28 d of NaCl treatment (over the first 4 d of which the concentration was increased by 50 mm per day), both varieties continued to grow, the biomass of both roots and shoots increased if measured as fresh or dry weight (data not shown). All the seedlings of Triumph were, however, dead after 44 d in NaCl, whereas 80% of the variety Gerbel had survived, although by 64 d all the plants were dead.

Cortical Cell Electrode Measurements of pH, Membrane Potential Difference (Em), Na+ Activity (aNa), and K+ Activity (aK)

The Na+ and K+measurements were separated into two populations by assigning each value to either the cytosol (Fig. 1) or the vacuole (Fig. 2) using measured pH values (Walker et al., 1995). Two normally distributed populations having means of pH 5.6 and 7.4 (see TableI) described the combined pH measurements obtained using both Na+- and K+-selective microelectrodes. Figures 1 and 2show the mean intracellular pH, Em, aNa, and aK measurements obtained using these microelectrodes in barley root cortical cells of plants growing for either 5 or 8 d in NaCl. After 5 d of salinization (1 d at 200 mm NaCl), the mean cytosolic aNa in Gerbel was only 1.7 mm, whereas Triumph had a markedly higher value of 19.5 mm, but these varietal differences had gone by 8 d (3 d at 200 mm NaCl; Fig. 1). At 5 d, cytosolic aK was very similar in Triumph and Gerbel, with both varieties having values of about 60 mm, but by 8 d, only in Triumph, the NaCl-sensitive variety, was there a significant decrease to 39 mm (Fig. 1). The cytosolic pH was not significantly different between varieties on either day.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Histograms showing the results of triple-barreled Na+ and K+ measurements in the cytosol of Triumph (white) and Gerbel (shaded) cortical root cells of seedlings treated with NaCl for 5 and 8 d. The values are means ± se of Em, aNa, aK, and pH and each value was obtained from between five and 28 samples.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Histograms showing the results of triple-barreled Na+ and K+ measurements in the vacuoles of Triumph (white) and Gerbel (shaded) cortical root cells of seedlings treated with NaCl for 5 and 8 d. From the top to the bottom, Mean ± se values of Em, aNa, aK, and pH measured in the cytosol. Each value was obtained from between four and 28 samples.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Statistical separation of the pH measurements in barley root cortical cells 1-a,1-b,1-c,1-d

Figure 3 shows a summary of the triple-barreled microelectrode data for the cortical cell compartments. At 5 d, both varieties had higher aNa in the vacuole than in the cytosol, and this difference was greater in the tolerant Gerbel than in Triumph (Fig. 3). By 8 d, these varietal differences had gone and in the tolerant Gerbel the vacuolar aNa had decreased when compared with 5 d (Fig. 2), but these changes were not significant (Fig. 3; ANOVAP = 0.12). The measurements of vacuolar aK showed similar values for both varieties around 18 mm at 5 d, although in Gerbel vacuolar K+ accumulation had increased by 8 d; this change was not statistically significant (Fig. 3; ANOVAP = 0.21). For both varieties, aKwas larger in the cytosolic than in vacuolar compartment (Fig.3).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Diagram showing a summary of the mean intracellular aK (mm), aNa (mm), pH, and Em (mV) in root cortical cells of Triumph (top) and Gerbel (bottom) during the transition from 5 to 8 d treated with NaCl. For each value when no change could be measured, a single value is shown. For comparison, the aK, aNa, and pH values of the nutrient solution bathing the roots are also shown. The significance of changes was tested by ANOVA. An asterisk indicates a probability of less than 5%.

After 5 d growing in NaCl, the Em values reported from both intracellular compartments differed between the varieties with Triumph having more negative values (comparing Figs. 1and 2). By 8 d, both varieties showed significantly more negative vacuolar Em values than at 5 d (Fig. 3), but at 8 d the only varietal differences were in cytosolic Em, which was more negative for Triumph (−94 ± 6 mV) compared with Gerbel (−72 ± 5 mV). After 8 d of salinization, the trans-tonoplast potential was −9 mV for Triumph and +9 mV for Gerbel (using the convention of Bertl et al., 1992). The microelectrode measurements of aK, aNa, and Em (Figs. 1 and 2) were used to investigate the energetic feasibility of likely transport mechanisms for Na+ and K+ across the plasma membrane and tonoplast.

Thermodynamics of Na+ Transport across the Plasma Membrane and Tonoplast

The Na+ electrochemical potential differences (ΔμNa) across both the plasma membrane and the tonoplast were calculated to determine whether active or passive transport was required to maintain these gradients (TableII). Extracellular aNa was measured by the Na+microelectrodes at 150 mm, both in the nutrient solution containing 200 mm NaCl and in the apoplast between epidermal and cortical cells (data not shown). This value of aNa is similar to the calculated value of 142 mm for the nutrient solution obtained using an activity coefficient of 0.71, determined using the Debeye-Hückel equation (Robinson and Stokes, 1970). The values in Table II show that for the cytosol, regardless of variety or time in NaCl, there was a large inwardly directed driving force for Na+across the plasma membrane of between −113 and −182 mV. The vacuolar accumulation of Na+ required active transport at the tonoplast, for Gerbel on 5 d, but this requirement had gone by 8 d. These results indicate that energy is needed to maintain this ion gradient, with efflux mechanisms removing Na+from the cytosol into either the extracellular solution or the vacuole, or both. The feasibility of several active Na+ transport mechanisms was assessed by calculating the associated free energy change (ΔG′/F) for each mechanism (Table III). In most of the conditions for the intracellular electrode measurements, an Na+/H+ antiport operating at the plasma membrane, transporting Na+ out of the cell, would be energetically feasible for maintaining the measured ion gradients. An exception is Gerbel on 5 d; for these conditions, the ΔG′/F at 5 d is +27 mV, showing that operating alone an antiport mechanism is not feasible for the measured ion gradients. The energy provided by the hydrolysis of ATP for Na+ efflux via either an Na+ or Na+-K+ ATPase was also assessed, despite a lack of evidence for such a mechanism in higher plant cells. This calculation reveals the efflux of Na+ across the plasma membrane via an ATPase to be energetically feasible (Table III).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table II.

The electrochemical potential differences for Na+ (ΔμNa/F) and K+(ΔμK/F) into the cytosol across both the plasma membrane and the tonoplast of barley root cortical cells 2-a,2-b,2-c

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table III.

The ΔG′/F associated with several different possible trans-plasma membrane and trans-tonoplast Na+-transporting mechanisms effluxing from the cytosol 3-a

In most cases for both varieties, a tonoplast H+/Na+ antiport was energetically feasible to explain the measured ionic gradients; the one exception was for Gerbel on d 5 (Table III).

Thermodynamics of K+ Transport across the Plasma Membrane and Tonoplast

Using the data for intracellular compartmentation of K+ (Figs. 1 and 2), the feasibility of K+ cotransport mechanisms was also assessed. Under these experimental conditions, K+ uptake into the cytoplasm across the plasma membrane cannot occur by a channel mechanism. The positive electrochemical potential values for K+, with ΔμK/F between +68 and +106 mV, show that active transport was required for K+ uptake from the external solution into the cytosol across the plasma membrane (Table II). Transport of K+ across the tonoplast into the cytosol would also require energy input with the ΔμK/F of +17 to +22 mV (Table II). Testing the thermodynamics of K+ uptake at the plasma membrane by both Na+- and H+-coupled symport mechanisms showed that both are feasible for maintaining the measured cytosolic aK in both varieties at both 5 and 8 d (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

One unavoidable consequence for plants growing in high concentrations of NaCl is that some of these ions will enter root cells and the ability of plants to survive depends on the balance between the entry and efflux from the cytoplasm. In this paper, we report directly measured root cellular activities of Na+, K+ and H+ under extreme conditions of NaCl stress. These measurements have then been used to compare the possible mechanisms that the cell may have for removing Na+ from the cytoplasm.

Varietal Differences in Cellular Cation Activities

The microelectrode measurements of aNa and aK in the root cortex show that there are large cellular differences between the varieties after just 5 d of treatment with NaCl (summarized in Fig. 3). After 5 d, the tolerant variety Gerbel seemed to be more effective at cytosolic Na+ exclusion and vacuolar sequestration than the more sensitive variety Triumph (Fig. 3), despite the large cytosol-directed electrochemical potentials for Na+ (Table II). However, statistical comparison of the mean values of aNa for 5 d for the two varieties were not significantly different (ANOVA P= 0.08). After 8 d, Gerbel was also better at maintaining cytosolic aK in the high background of 200 mm NaCl (ANOVA P < 0.05). Expressing the cytosolic K+:Na+ ratios, 34.7 for Gerbel and 3.2 for Triumph, illustrates clearly the large differences in the response of the two varieties after 5 d in NaCl. However, after 8 d of growing in 200 mm NaCl, the cytosolic K+:Na+ ratios of the two varieties were very similar (Gerbel, 2.1; and Triumph, 2.9). These changes in cytosolic cation activities agree with the whole-plant responses of the two varieties showing that NaCl tolerance under these conditions was a matter of differing survival times.

K Deficiency, Compartmental pH, and NaCl Stress

Undoubtedly, the application of NaCl to plants alters the intracellular pools of K+, but is this cellular response similar to that brought about by a lack of K+ in the nutrient solution? Subcellular compartmentation of K+ in barley is known to change in response to changes in external K supply (Memon et al., 1985). Under K+-replete conditions, there is cytosolic aK homeostasis at around 70 mm, whereas vacuolar aK changes in response to changes in external K+ (Walker et al., 1996). Vacuolar activities decreased from 100 mm in replete plants to less than 25 mm for deficient plants, when the external K+ supply was decreased (Walker et al., 1996, 1998). During extreme K+ starvation, barley root epidermal cells showed a decrease in cytosolic aK to 40 mm accompanied by an acidification of the cytosol to pH 6.7 (Walker et al., 1996). In the present study, treatment of plants with 200 mm NaCl, combined with low external K+ of 0.1 mm, produced cortical cell cytosolic aK as low as 39 mm in the variety Triumph by 8 d (Figs. 1 and 3). At this cytosolic aK, decreases in the rates of K-dependent biochemical processes and, hence, growth would result (Leigh and Wyn Jones, 1984; Walker et al., 1998). Cytoplasmic K+ concentrations (rather than activities) of 60 to 80 mm, for plants growing at the same sodium concentration but 60 times the potassium concentration for 15 d and calculated from x-ray microanalyses (Flowers and Hajibagheri, 2001), were remarkably similar to our microelectrode measurements.

The pH electrode measurements of both K+ and Na+ triple-barreled electrodes separated into two distinct populations, and the more alkaline population of measurements was assumed to be from the cytosol. These values for the cytosolic pH are very similar to those measured previously for unstressed barley roots using microelectrodes (7.3 ± 0.1; Walker et al., 1996, 1998). In the salinized cells described here, there was no evidence for an associated acidification with depletion of cytosolic aK (Figs. 1 and 3). This result suggests that within cells, the depletion of cytosolic aK resulting from NaCl treatment is physiologically different from that associated with K starvation, although another possible explanation is that epidermal and cortical cells respond differently to depletion of cytosolic aK. In support of this idea, we know that the expression pattern of a high-K+/low-Na+ affinity transporter (HKT1) in wheat is stronger in root cortical cells (Schachtman and Schroeder, 1994) and during K+ withdrawal (Wang et al., 1998).

The pH values for both the cytosol and the vacuole broadly agree with values published for barley roots obtained using31P-NMR (Martinez and Läuchli, 1993; Katsuhara et al., 1997). These NMR measurements for unsalinized barley roots gave mean pH values of 7.5 to 7.7 and 5.5 to 5.7 in the cytosol and vacuole, respectively. In both reports, the addition of NaCl resulted in an alkalization of the vacuole (to over pH 6), but almost no change in the pH of the cytosol (Martinez and Läuchli, 1993; Katsuhara et al., 1997). Although these values obtained using NMR are similar to the results reported here, where the mean cytosolic pH was 7.5 for both varieties, there was no significant alkalization of the vacuolar pH from 5 to 8 d (Fig. 2). In wheat, NaCl stimulation of proton pumping at the plasma membrane has been measured (Ayala et al., 1997), and this is consistent with the measured more negative membrane potential in Triumph compared with Gerbel at 8 d (Figs. 1 and 3), possibly indicating a greater level of NaCl stress in this variety.

Transport Mechanisms That Are Important in NaCl Tolerance

Na+ might enter cells through nonselective cation channels (Schachtman et al., 1991;Davenport and Tester, 2000; Maathuis and Sanders, 2001), and HAK1- (Santa-Marı́a et al., 1997) and HKT1-type transporters (Rubio et al., 1995; Rus et al., 2001). The ability of the plant cell to prevent, at least in the short term, a net rise in cytosolic Na+ is demonstrated here by the recorded values of between 2 and 33 mm, for 5 to 8 d in the high background of 200 mm Na+in the external solution (aNa = 142 mm). After 15 d at the same salinity, barley root cell cytoplasmic Na+ concentrations (rather than activities) were calculated from x-ray microanalyses to be 180 to 245 mm (Flowers and Hajibagheri, 2001). These plants had been grown at 60 times the K+concentration used in the experiments described here and although the cytoplasmic concentration of Na+ was estimated to be 1.4 times higher for Triumph than Gerbel, the difference was not statistically significant: There were no significant differences in K+ concentrations between varieties. Several membrane transport mechanisms have been proposed to explain K+/Na+ selectivity in higher plants. These include exclusion at the uptake stage, when there can be high selectivity against Na+ entry though channels (e.g. Amtmann and Sanders, 1999; Tyerman and Skerrett, 1999), and efflux of Na+back into the external solution or the vacuole. The electrochemical gradients measured here for Na+ indicate that there was a large cytosol-directed gradient (Table II), and active transport would be required to remove cytosolic Na+. Although a Na+-pumping ATPase is implicated in the NaCl tolerance of marine algae (Shono et al., 2001), and although energetically feasible (see Table III), a similar direct role for a primary pump removing Na+ from the cytosol in higher plants has yet to be shown. The role and molecular identities of H+/Na+ exchangers, at both the plasma membrane (Qiu et al., 2002) and tonoplast (Apse et al., 1999; Zhang and Blumwald, 2001), in the NaCl tolerance of higher plants is now well established. For most of the conditions tested in this paper, a plasma membrane H+/Na+ antiport with a stoichiometry of 1:1 could operate to achieve the measured ion gradients; only for Gerbel on d 5 was this mechanism not energetically feasible (Table III). This result for Gerbel at 5 d may indicate that the antiport has a variable H+/Na+ stoichiometry ratio enabling the maintenance of such a low cytosolic aNa. The activity of a plasma membrane H+/Na+ antiport should lead to an acidification of the cytosol between 5 and 8 d, but no such change was measured (Figs. 1 and 3), a result that agrees with measurements obtained using 31P-NMR (Martinez and Läuchli, 1993; Katsuhara et al., 1997). An increased activity of the plasma membrane H+ pump may function to regulate cytosolic pH, compensating for any acidification caused by an antiporter removing Na+ from the cytosol. Our microelectrode measurements show that there was a hyperpolarization of the plasma membrane potential in Triumph root cells between 5 and 8 d, becoming more negative by between 10 and 20 mV (Figs. 1 and 3). However, this change in membrane potential was not statistically significant (ANOVA P = 0.2), but a similar change in the membrane potential was also measured in root cells of Triumph treated directly with 200 mm NaCl (Carden et al., 2001).

At the tonoplast, there was also a cytosol-directed ΔμNa/F indicating that an active transport process was operating on the tonoplast transporting Na+ into the vacuole (Table II). Na+/H+ antiports have been found on the tonoplast of barley, with energy provided by the proton pumps (Garbarino and DuPont, 1989; Martinez and Läuchli, 1993). Moreover, the tonoplast ATPase of barley is stimulated by the presence of NaCl (Garbarino and DuPont, 1988; Matsumo and Chung, 1988). The operation of a H+/Na+antiport might be expected to result in an alkalization of the vacuole, but this was not observed between 5 and 8 d (Fig. 2). NMR measurements showed barley vacuolar alkalization upon exposure to NaCl and these measurements used excised root tips measured for up to 6 h after NaCl treatment (Martinez and Läuchli, 1993; Katsuhara et al., 1997). The microelectrode measurements do show significant vacuole alkalization when the values in Figures 2 and 3 are compared with values for root cells not treated with NaCl (pH 5.1–5.3; Walker et al., 1995, 1996). Therefore, there is evidence to support a tonoplast-located Na+/H+ antiport as the main mechanism for vacuolar sequestration of Na+. The microelectrode measurements show that in the longer term response to NaCl stress, the increased activity of tonoplast H+ pumps can maintain vacuolar pH. This result agrees with the observation that transgenic plants overexpressing a vacuolar H+/Na+ antiport have improved NaCl tolerance, accumulating NaCl in the vacuole but also able to maintain normal pH regulation within intracellular compartments (Apse et al., 1999; Zhang and Blumwald, 2001). In addition, the removal of protons from the cytosol by the tonoplast pumps would offset an acidification of the cytosol by the actions of a plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiport. This may also explain the lack of cytosolic acidification observed between 5 and 8 d as the cytosolic aK is depleted and that occurs during K+ deficiency (Walker et al., 1996, 1998).

Clearly salinity tolerance depends on sustaining the cytosolic environment, limiting Na+ accumulation and maintaining K+ concentration. Microelectrode measurements of root cell responses to salinity suggest that for the first 5 d, the tolerant variety Gerbel is better able to exclude Na+ and then by 8 d better at maintaining K+ when compared with Triumph (see Fig. 3). In root cells, these varietal differences only seem to occur early on in the salinity response; by 15 d, no significant differences were measured (Flowers and Hajibagheri, 2001). The differences between Gerbel and Triumph at 5 d cannot be explained by the activity of a plasma membrane H+/Na+ antiport because this mechanism is not energetically feasible to explain the measured electrochemical gradients in the tolerant plant. Possible differences in the Na+ exclusion mechanisms for uptake may be important for explaining these early differences between the two varieties. Both this result and the differences after 8 d between Gerbel and Triumph in the ability to maintain cytosolic K+ could be explained by subtle changes in the properties of either a root HKT1-type transporter (Rubio et al., 1995; Rus et al., 2001) or HAK1-type transporter (Santa-Marı́a et al., 1997).

The microelectrode data have provided direct intracellular measurements of three cations during the early onset of NaCl stress well before any visual stress symptoms have appeared in the plants. This nondestructive technique can be used for the analysis of transport mechanisms in single cells of mutant plants with altered expression of transporters; for example, Arabidopsis mutants with altered expression and activity of H+/Na+ exchangers (Qiu et al., 2002). The subsequent data analysis can show the feasibility of transport mechanisms at both the plasma membrane and tonoplast in single cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant Material

Barley seeds (Hordeum vulgare L. cv Triumph and cv Gerbel) were germinated in darkness for 3 d on filter paper moistened with 0.2 mm CaSO4. Five seedlings of each variety were transferred to 1.5-L pots containing a solution containing the following nutrients: Ca(NO3)2 (5 mm), KH2PO4 (0.1 mm), MgSO4 (2 mm), plus micronutrients (Hoagland and Arnon, 1938), and a buffer, MES/Tris (5 mm), pH 6.0. The final K+concentration in the solution was only 0.1 mm compared with the 6 mm used in the experiments conducted byFlowers and Hajibagheri (2001). The seedlings were grown in a cabinet at 20°C (day/night), 16 h d−1 photon flux density of 300 μmol m−2 s−1, and 75% relative humidity. The nutrient solution was vigorously aerated with compressed air and was replaced every 2 d. After 4 d, the NaCl concentration in the solution was increased in steps of 50 mm d−1 to a final value of 200 mmNaCl. The microelectrode measurements were made on seedlings that had been growing for either 5 or 8 d in NaCl (1 or 4 d, respectively, in 200 mm NaCl). During this 8 d in NaCl, no significant differences in growth, measured as root fresh or dry weight, were found between the two varieties (data not shown).

Electrode Manufacture and Calibration

Triple-barreled microelectrodes were prepared as described previously (Walker et al., 1995) and filled using pH (Miller and Smith, 1992), K+ (Walker et al., 1995), and Na+ (Carden et al., 2001) sensor cocktails. The ion-selective barrels were backfilled from the blunt end with the sensors using a 29-gauge metal needle and a 1-mL glass syringe, leaving 48 to 72 h between backfilling neighboring barrels.

All ion-selective barrels were calibrated before and after an intracellular impalement. The pH-selective barrel was calibrated using 1 mm BisTris/MES buffers in the range 5.0 to 8.0. These calibration solutions also contained 50 mm NaCl to maintain the function of the Na+-selective barrel as the performance of an ion-selective microelectrode deteriorates when not immersed in the primary sensing ion (Miller, 1995). No interference to the response of the pH-selective barrel was detected over a range of 0.1 to 100 mm NaCl (data not shown). The Na+-selective barrel was calibrated as described previously (Carden et al., 2001) and all calibration lines were obtained by fitting a Nicolsky-Eisenman equation to the calibration data.

Microelectrode Measurements

For intracellular measurements, intact barley seedlings were mounted on a microscope stage with the root fixed to the base of a perfusion chamber using small Plexiglas blocks and grease (Walker et al., 1995). The root was perfused with nutrient solution containing 200 mm NaCl. Microelectrode recordings were made using a high-impedance differential electrometer and recorded as described previously (Walker et al., 1995). Measurements were made on root epidermal and cortical cells, 10 to 20 mm from the root tip. The initial impalement of an epidermal cell could be confirmed visually, after which it was not possible to see the location of the tip. Electrode impalements in epidermal cells reported poor membrane potentials, suggesting that these cells were damaged by the NaCl treatment (Carden et al., 2001).

Electrochemical Gradients and the Energetic Feasibility of Transport Mechanisms

The electrochemical difference for Na+(ΔμNa) across a membrane was calculated by subtracting the calculated Nernst potential for specified measured conditions from the Em measured in identical conditions (Table II). A negative result indicates that ion uptake was passive, whereas a positive result indicates that active uptake was required. The energetic feasibility of a particular transport mechanism for an ion moving down its electrical gradient was assessed by calculating the ΔG′/F given by the general equation in which the free energy is in terms of the electrochemical potential of the ion (mV). The individual equations used for these calculations are shown below for TableIII.

For the plasma membrane H+/Na+ antiport, the equation ΔG′/F = −59log[((aNa)cyt(aH)out)/((aNa)out(aH)cyt)] with a 1:1 stoichiometry was used. A similar equation for the tonoplast-located antiport was used. For a plasma membrane-located Na+-ATPase, the equation ΔG′/F = −(Em) − 59log[(([ATP](aNa)cyt)/([ADP][Pi](aNa)out))] + ΔG°ATP/F was used. For a plasma membrane-located Na+-K+-ATPase mechanism, transporting Na+ from, and K+ into, the cytosol across the plasma membrane, the equation ΔG′/F = −59log[(([ATP](aNa)cyt)(aK)out/([ADP][Pi](aNa)out)(aK)cyt)] + ΔG°ATP/F was used. The energetic calculations requiring ATP hydrolysis are based on a Na:K stoichiometry of 1:1 and using ΔG°ATP/F = −283 mV (Rosing and Slater, 1972), 0.4 mm ATP, 150 μmADP, and 2.5 mm Pi free concentrations (Roberts et al., 1985).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Susan Smith and Tony Yeo for their helpful discussion and Dermot Diamond (Dublin City University, UK) for the supply of the calixarene ionophore.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work and Rothamsted Research are supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (UK; studentship award to D.E.C.).

  • ↵2 Present address: Università degli Studi di Padova, Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Agrarie, Agripolis, Via Romea 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.

  • ↵3 Present address: Department of Environmental Resources, Centro de Edafologı́a y Biologı́a Aplicada del Segura, Apartado 4195, 30080 Murcia, Spain.

  • ↵* Corresponding author; e-mail tony.miller{at}bbsrc.ac.uk; fax 44–1582–763010.

  • Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.011445.

  • Received July 31, 2002.
  • Revision received September 29, 2002.
  • Accepted October 19, 2002.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Apse MP,
    2. Aharon GS,
    3. Snedden WA,
    4. Blumwald E
    (1999) Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science 285:1256–1258.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Amtmann A,
    2. Sanders D
    (1999) Mechanisms of Na+ uptake by plant cells. Adv Bot Res 29:75–112.
  3. ↵
    1. Ayala F,
    2. Ashraf M,
    3. O'Leary JW
    (1997) Plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity in salt-tolerant and salt sensitive lines of spring wheat (Tritcum aestivum L.) Acta Bot Neerl 46:315–324.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Bertl A,
    2. Blumwald E,
    3. Coronado R,
    4. Eisenberg R,
    5. Findlay G,
    6. Gradmann D,
    7. Hille B,
    8. Kohler K,
    9. Kolb H-A,
    10. MacRobbie E,
    11. et al
    (1992) Electrical measurements on endomembranes. Science 258:873–874.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Carden DE,
    2. Diamond D,
    3. Miller AJ
    (2001) An improved Na+-selective microelectrode for intracellular measurements in plant cells. J Exp Bot 52:1353–1359.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Davenport RJ,
    2. Tester M
    (2000) A weakly voltage-dependent, nonselective cation channel mediates toxic sodium influx in wheat. Plant Physiol 122:823–834.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Downton WJS
    (1984) Salt tolerance of food crops: perspectives for improvements. Crit Rev Plant Sci 1:183–201.
  8. ↵
    1. Flowers TJ,
    2. Dalmond D
    (1992) Protein synthesis in halophytes: the influence of potassium, sodium and magnesium in vitro. Plant Soil 146:153–161.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Flowers TJ,
    2. Hajibagheri MA
    (2001) Salinity tolerance in Hordeum vulgare: ion concentrations in root cells of cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Plant Soil 231:1–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Garbarino J,
    2. DuPont F
    (1988) NaCl induces a Na+/H+ antiport in tonoplast vesicles from barley roots. Plant Physiol 86:231–236.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Garbarino J,
    2. DuPont F
    (1989) Rapid induction of Na+/H+ exchange activity in barley root tonoplast. Plant Physiol 89:1–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Greenway H
    (1962) Plant response to saline substrates. I. Growth and ion uptake of several varieties of Hordeum during and after sodium chloride treatment. Aust J Biol Sci 15:16–38.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Hoagland DR,
    2. Arnon DI
    (1938) The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agric Exp Stat Circ 347:1–32.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Katsuhara M,
    2. Yazaki Y,
    3. Sakano K,
    4. Kawasaki T
    (1997) Intracellular pH and proton-transport in barley root cells under salt stress: in vivo 31P-NMR study. Plant Cell Environ 38:155–160.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Leigh RA,
    2. Wyn Jones RG
    (1984) An hypothesis relating critical potassium concentrations for growth to the distribution and functions of this ion in the plant cell. New Phytol 80:1–13.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Maathuis FJM,
    2. Amtmann A
    (1999) K+ nutrition and Na+ toxicity: the basis of cellular K+/Na+ ratios. Ann Bot 84:123–133.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Maathuis FJM,
    2. Sanders D
    (2001) Sodium uptake in Arabidopsis roots is regulated by cyclic nucleotides. Plant Physiol 127:1617–1625.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Martinez V,
    2. Läuchli A
    (1993) Effects of Ca2+ on the salt-stress response of barley roots as observed by in vivo 31P-nuclear magnetic resonance and in-vitro analysis. Planta 190:519–524.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Matsumo H,
    2. Chung GC
    (1988) Increase in proton-transport activity of tonoplast vesicles as an adaptive response of barley roots to NaCl stress. Plant Cell Physiol 29:1133–1140.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Memon AR,
    2. Saccomani M,
    3. Glass ADM
    (1985) Efficiency of potassium utilization by barley varieties: the role of subcellular compartmentation. J Exp Bot 36:1860–1876.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Miller AJ,
    2. Smith SJ
    (1992) The mechanism of nitrate transport across the tonoplast of barley root cells. Planta 187:554–557.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Miller AJ
    (1995) Ion-selective microelectrodes for measurement of intracellular ion concentrations. Methods Plant Cell Biol 49:275–291.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Qiu Q-S,
    2. Guo Y,
    3. Dietrich MA,
    4. Schumaker KS,
    5. Zhu J-K
    (2002) Regulation of SOS1, a plasma membrane Na+/H+ exchanger in Arabidopsis thaliana, by SOS2 and SOS3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8436–8441.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Roberts JKM,
    2. Lane AN,
    3. Clark RA,
    4. Nieman RH
    (1985) Relationships between the rate of synthesis of ATP and the concentrations of reactants and products of ATP hydrolysis in maize root tips, determined by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance. Arch Biochem Biophys 240:712–722.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Robinson RA,
    2. Stokes RH
    (1970) Electrolyte Solutions. (Butterworths, London).
  26. ↵
    1. Rosing J,
    2. Slater EC
    (1972) The value of ΔG° for the hydrolysis of ATP. Biochim Biophys Acta 267:275–290.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Rubio F,
    2. Gassman W,
    3. Schroeder JI
    (1995) Sodium-driven potassium uptake by the plant potassium transporter HKT1 and mutations conferring salt tolerance. Science 270:1660–1663.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Rus A,
    2. Yokai S,
    3. Sharkhuu A,
    4. Reddy M,
    5. Lee B,
    6. Matsumoto TK,
    7. Koiwa H,
    8. Zhu J-K,
    9. Bressan RA,
    10. Hasegawa PM
    (2001) AtHKT1 is a salt tolerance determinant that controls Na+ entry into plant roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:14150–14155.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Santa-Marı́a GE,
    2. Rubio F,
    3. Dubcovsky J,
    4. Rodrı́guez-Navarro A
    (1997) The HAK1 gene of barley is a member of a large gene family and encodes a high-affinity potassium transporter. Plant Cell 9:2281–2289.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Schachtman DP,
    2. Tyerman SD,
    3. Terry BR
    (1991) The K+/Na+ selectivity of a cation channel on the plasma membrane of root cells does not differ in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive wheat species. Plant Physiol 97:589–605.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Schachtman DP,
    2. Schroeder JI
    (1994) Structure and transport mechanism of a high-affinity potassium uptake transporter from higher plants. Nature 370:655–658.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Shono M,
    2. Wada M,
    3. Hara Y,
    4. Fujii T
    (2001) Molecular cloning of Na+-ATPase cDNA from a marine alga, Heterosigma akashiwo. Biochim Biophys Acta 1511:193–199.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Tyerman SD,
    2. Skerrett M
    (1999) Root ion channels and salinity. Sci Hortic 78:175–235.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Walker DJ,
    2. Black CR,
    3. Miller AJ
    (1998) The role of cytosolic K+ and pH in the growth of barley roots. Plant Physiol 118:957–964.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Walker DJ,
    2. Leigh RA,
    3. Miller AJ
    (1996) Potassium homeostasis in vacuolate plant cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:10510–10514.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Walker DJ,
    2. Smith SJ,
    3. Miller AJ
    (1995) Simultaneous measurement of intracellular pH and K+ or NO3− in barley root cells using triple-barreled, ion-selective microelectrodes. Plant Physiol 108:743–751.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  37. ↵
    1. Wang T-B,
    2. Gassman W,
    3. Rubio F,
    4. Schroeder JI,
    5. Glass ADM
    (1998) Rapid up-regulation of HKT1, a high-affinity potassium transporter gene, in roots of barley and wheat following withdrawal of potassium. Plant Physiol 118:651–659.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Läuchli A,
    2. Bieleski RL
    1. Wyn Jones RG,
    2. Pollard A
    (1983) Protein, enzymes and inorganic ions. in Inorganic Plant Nutrition. eds Läuchli A, Bieleski RL (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), pp 528–562.
  39. ↵
    1. Zhang H-X,
    2. Blumwald E
    (2001) Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nat Biotechnol 19:765–768.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Physiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Single-Cell Measurements of the Contributions of Cytosolic Na+ and K+ to Salt Tolerance
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Physiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Physiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Single-Cell Measurements of the Contributions of Cytosolic Na+ and K+ to Salt Tolerance
David E. Carden, David J. Walker, Timothy J. Flowers, Anthony J. Miller
Plant Physiology Feb 2003, 131 (2) 676-683; DOI: 10.1104/pp.011445

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Single-Cell Measurements of the Contributions of Cytosolic Na+ and K+ to Salt Tolerance
David E. Carden, David J. Walker, Timothy J. Flowers, Anthony J. Miller
Plant Physiology Feb 2003, 131 (2) 676-683; DOI: 10.1104/pp.011445
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

Plant Physiology: 131 (2)
Plant Physiology
Vol. 131, Issue 2
Feb 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • The Cell Wall of the Arabidopsis Pollen Tube—Spatial Distribution, Recycling, and Network Formation of Polysaccharides
  • Systems Dynamic Modeling of a Guard Cell Cl− Channel Mutant Uncovers an Emergent Homeostatic Network Regulating Stomatal Transpiration
  • Vacuolar CAX1 and CAX3 Influence Auxin Transport in Guard Cells via Regulation of Apoplastic pH
Show more CELL BIOLOGY AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Physiology Preview
  • Archive
  • Focus Collections
  • Classic Collections
  • The Plant Cell
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Journal Miles
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire