Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
OtherUPDATE ON LEGUME UTILIZATION
You have accessRestricted Access

Legumes: Importance and Constraints to Greater Use

Peter H. Graham, Carroll P. Vance
Peter H. Graham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carroll P. Vance
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published March 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.017004

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • Copyright © 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists

Legumes, broadly defined by their unusual flower structure, podded fruit, and the ability of 88% of the species examined to date to form nodules with rhizobia (de Faria et al., 1989), are second only to the Graminiae in their importance to humans. The 670 to 750 genera and 18,000 to 19,000 species of legumes (Polhill et al., 1981) include important grain, pasture, and agroforestry species. Cohen (1977; cited by Bryan [2000]) reported domestication of lentils (Lens esculenta) at a site in Iran dating to 9,500 to 8,000 BP;Roosevelt et al. (1996) noted the use of Hymenaea as a food source in Amazonian prehistory. Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and soybean (Glycine max), staple crops in the Americas and Asia, respectively, were each domesticated more than 3,000 years ago (Hymowitz and Singh, 1987; Kaplan and Lynch, 1999). Use of legumes in pastures and for soil improvement dates back to the Romans, with Varro (37 BC; cited by Fred et al. [1932]) noting “Legumes should be planted in light soils, not so much for their own crops as for the good they do to subsequent crops.” This paper briefly overviews the legumes and their importance in different agricultural and natural environments.

GRAIN AND PASTURE PRODUCTION

Grain and forage legumes are grown on some 180 million Ha, or 12% to 15% of the Earth's arable surface (TableI). They account for 27% of the world's primary crop production, with grain legumes alone contributing 33% of the dietary protein nitrogen (N) needs of humans (Vance et al., 2000). Under subsistence conditions, the percentage of legume protein N in the diet can reach twice this figure. In rank order, bean, pea (Pisum sativum), chickpea (Cicer arietinum), broad bean (Vicia faba), pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), and lentil constitute the primary dietary legumes (National Academy of Science, 1994). Legumes (predominantly soybean and peanut [Arachis hypogeae]) provide more than 35% of the world's processed vegetable oil (Table II), and soybean and peanut are also rich sources of dietary protein for the chicken and pork industries. The potential of legume crops is evident in the huge increase in soybean production in Brazil, with national mean yields increased from 1,166 kg ha−1 in 1968 to 1969 to 2,567 kg ha−1 in 2001 to 2002 (M. Hungria, personal communication). This followed selection for later maturity, aluminum tolerance, and calcium-use efficiency (Spehar, 1995). In the same crop, the controversy over molecular engineering, with some countries refusing to grow transgenic soybean illustrates the need for balance in future breeding activities.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Crop production and area harvested

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table II.

Major crops oil production

Unfortunately, improvement in legume crop yields have not kept pace with those of cereals. Jeuffroy and Ney (1997) note that wheat (Triticum aestivum) yields in France increased 120 kg ha−1 year−1 between 1981 and 1996; those for pea increased only 75 kg ha−1 year−1 over the same period. The situation is worse in the developing countries whereOram and Agcaoili (1992) note that pea yields are only 45%, and faba bean and chickpea are only 75%, of those achieved in developed countries. In part, this difference is due to the unfavorable environmental conditions under which many legume species are grown. Legumes are often grown after corn or rice and are seeded toward the end of the growing season. They may have short growing seasons and may be subject to intermittent or terminal drought. Progressive soil chemical and physical degradation and acid soil conditions may also limit their productivity.

Drought problems for legumes are likely to worsen with the projected rapid expansion of water-stressed areas of the world from 28 to 30 countries today to 50 countries encompassing 3 billion people by 2030 (Postel, 2000). There is a crucial need to increase drought tolerance in legumes; increasing salinity tolerance is a parallel requirement in many areas. The more drought-tolerant legumes, such as cowpea, are deeply rooted and may have reduced leaf size with thickened cuticles to reduce water loss. Less tolerant legumes such as beans can be selected for early maturity, efficiency in the partitioning of nutrients toward reproductive structures, and phenotypic plasticity (Beaver et al., 2003). Pinto Villa, now grown over 90% of the pinto bean area in Mexico, has these characteristics.

Nutrient depletion of soil is a particular problem for small landholders in developing countries, where much grain-legume production occurs, and many farmers cannot afford to use fertilizers.Sanchez (2002) suggests average annual nutrient depletion rates across 37 African countries of 22 kg N ha−1, 2.5 kg P ha−1, and 15 kg K ha−1. Soil acidity affects more than 1.5 billion ha worldwide, with acid soil constraints to legume production likely to increase as the result of acid rain, long-term N fertilization, and natural weathering (Graham and Vance, 2000). H ion concentration per se, Al and Mn toxicity, and P, Mo, or Ca deficiency all contribute to the problem (Graham, 1992). Nodulation and N fixation and survival of rhizobia in soil are particularly affected under low P, acid soil conditions and will be considered in more detail later in this paper.

Diseases and pests are also major constraints to legume production, especially in the tropics and subtropics. In common bean, for example, important pathogens include several viruses, fungi-causing root rots, anthracnose, angular leaf spot, bean rust, white mold and web blight, and the bacteria responsible for common bacterial blight and halo blight (Coyne et al., 2003). In Minnesota alone, losses due to root rot are estimated at $4 million annually. A number of these pathogens are seed transmitted; others can be carried by insects. Limiting crop losses requires an integrated approach that may include certified seed programs, fallow periods to reduce vector populations, plowing to bury infected plant tissue, biological control of root disease, chemical application, and resistance breeding (Beaver et al., 2003; Coyne et al., 2003). Molecular markers have permitted rapid progress in disease resistance breeding in beans (Kelly et al., 2003), but many of the measures suggested above are beyond the resources of the subsistence farmer, which is another reason why legume yields in third-world countries are low.

Use of legumes in the human diet can also be problematic. Legume seeds generally contain 20% to 30% protein and are Lys rich, complementing the nutritional profiles of cereals and tubers in the diet (Duranti and Gius, 1997). However, legumes are limited in sulfur amino acids, contain antinutritional factors including lectins and flatulence factors, and are commonly hard to cook. Preference for particular grain types or seed color also affects marketability.

Forage legumes have been the foundation for dairy and meat production for centuries (Russelle, 2001). When properly managed, they are rich sources of protein, fiber, and energy. Even in intensive animal and milk production, where grain crops are major feed sources, forage legumes are required to maintain animal health (Wattiaux and Howard, 2001). Meat and dairy production in developing countries is almost solely dependent upon forage legumes and grasses. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) is the prevalent forage legume in temperate climates (Russelle, 2001), with more than 72 million Mg of alfalfa worth $7 billion produced annually in the U.S. alone. Alfalfa is the third or fourth most valuable crop in the U.S. (U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, http://www.nass.usda.gov:81/ipedb/hay.htm). Other important temperate pasture species include clovers (Trifolium spp.), trefoil (Lotus corniculatus), sweetclovers (Melilotus spp.), and vetches (Viciaspp.).

Inclusion of legumes is critical for sustainable meat and dairy production on the infertile savannah soils of the tropics and subtropics (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, http://www.cgiar.org/research/res_cattle.html). Incorporation of improved legumes into these ecosystems has lagged due to lack of information, seed costs, and poor infrastructure. Species from the genera Aeschynomene, Arachis,Centrosema, Desmodium, Macroptilium, and Stylosanthes offer promise for improved tropical pasture systems (Thomas and Sumberg, 1995; Giller, 2001). Of these, Stylosanthes spp. with some 30 species distributed throughout the tropics (de Leeuw et al., 1994), has been most widely adopted, withStylosanthes guyanensis and Stylosanthes hamata now grown as improved pasture in Australia, China, Latin America, and West Africa.

Presently underutilized crop and pasture legumes could still emerge.Ladizinsky and Smartt (2000) address opportunities for improved adaptation via further domestication. More exotic examples include marama bean (Tylosema esculentum; Dakora et al., 1999), sword beans (Canavalia gladiata;Ekanayake et al., 2000), and Desmanthus illinoensis among grain crops, and annual medics andBiserrula pelecinus among pasture species (Howieson et al., 1995, 2000). Again, germplasm collection and evaluation must continue to be a research emphasis.

AGROFORESTRY

Sprent and Parsons (2000) discuss the importance of woody tree legumes in forestry. Important genera includeAcacia, Anadenathera, Calliandra,Dalbergia, Erythrina, Gliricidia,Melanoxylon, Parkea, Prosopis,Pterocarpus, and Samanea. Values for the percentage of plant N derived from fixation in such species listed byGiller (2001) range from 2% to 100% but need to be treated with caution. J. Grossman (personal communication) suggests that Inga oerstediana, widely used in southern Mexico as a shade tree with coffee, may not even be capable of establishing an effective symbiosis.

Food security issues, pressure on the land, and increasing soil degradation (Franzluebbers et al., 1998; Cassman, 1999; Sanchez, 2002) have led to increasing research interest in tree-fallow and alley-cropping systems for subsistence farmers in Africa and Asia. These are reviewed byBuresh et al. (1997) and by Buresh and Cooper (1999). In tree fallows, Sesbania spp.,Leucaena spp., Tephrosia spp.,Crotalaria spp., Glyricidia spp., orCajanus spp. are interplanted into corn, and allowed to grow as dry-season or longer-term fallows. The wood is harvested, and the N-rich leaves, pods, and green stem material are hoed into the soil just before the rainy season (Sanchez, 1999).Gathumbi et al. (2002) reported aboveground biomass production in a 6-month period of 8 to 15 Mg ha−1, with total N accumulation of 100 to 178 kg ha−1. Significant crop yield increases in the season after tree fallow have been reported. Legume tree fodder with high levels of crude protein and minerals, and in some cases, good digestibility is readily accepted by livestock. Fertilization with rock phosphate is often needed to improve the N benefits from tree fallows.

Alley cropping, with crops grown between hedgerows, and tree prunings used as mulch or green manure can also provide significant N to the interspersed crop. In Costa Rica, Phaseolus spp. beans grown between Erythrina poeppigiana rows and supplied prunings from these trees yielded 15% to 50% more than beans grown in monoculture (Henriksen et al., 2002).Sesbania sp. has been used similarly for alley cropping in rice. Nevertheless, Giller (2001) points to problems with this system, including competition for moisture between trees and crop plants, and declining yield benefits over time on infertile or acid soils.

The increased role for N-fixing legumes under subsistence conditions has recently been recognized with the award of the 2002 World Food Prize to Dr. Pedro Sanchez, former director-general of the International Center for Research in Agroforestry.

NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS

N is the primary nutrient limiting plant production in most natural ecosystems (Seastedt and Knapp, 1993;Vitousek et al., 1997). Legumes, through their symbiotic abilities, can play an important role in colonizing disturbed ecosystems, including those that are fire prone (Arianoutsou and Thanos, 1996). Rates of N2 fixation in such environments are often low, but can still satisfy much of the legume's N needs. B. Tlusty and P.H. Graham (personal communication) found the percentage of plant N derived from fixation values for five legumes in a seeded and inoculated long-grass prairie to range from 36% to almost 100%. Spehn et al. (2002) examined plant species and functional groupings among grassland communities in seven countries in Europe. Two years after sowing, the presence of legumes affected N pool size in five of the seven sites. Such a build-up in soil N is probably not open ended, because Pearson and Vitousek (2001) noted a 10- to 20-fold decline in nodule mass and N fixation between 6- and 20-year-old regenerating stands of Acacia koa. A model developed by Vitousek and Field (1999)associated reduction in N2 fixation with shade, P limitation, and grazing.

Atmospheric CO2 enrichment and N deposition, each a major ecological concern, are likely to have opposing effects in natural ecosystems. Hardy and Havelka (1976) showed N2 fixation enhanced under CO2 enrichment, and both legume biomass and frequency were enhanced in free-air CO2enrichment studies (Reich et al., 2001;Teyssonneyre et al., 2002). Total N in Lespedeza capitata and Lupinus perrenis increased 58.3% and 32.0%, respectively at 560 μmol mol−1CO2 (Reich et al., 2001). In contrast, C3 and C4 grasses were responsive to N deposition, whereas legumes showing little response. Influence of N on legume/grass balance in pastures is well documented. In a model developed by Thornley et al. (1995), the legume fraction in pasture declined from 18% to 1% as N supply was increased.

INDUSTRIAL AND MEDICINAL USE OF LEGUMES

In addition to traditional food and forage uses, legumes can be milled into flour, used to make bread, doughnuts, tortillas, chips, spreads, and extruded snacks (R. Phillips personal communication) or used in liquid form to produce milks, yogurt, and infant formula (Garcia et al., 1998). Pop beans (Popenoe et al., 1989), licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra;Kindscher, 1992), and soybean candy (Genta et al., 2002) provide novel uses for specific legumes.

Legumes have been used industrially to prepare biodegradable plastics (Paetau et al., 1994), oils, gums, dyes, and inks (Morris, 1997). Galactomannan gums derived fromCyamopsis spp. and Sesbania spp. are used in sizing textiles and paper, as a thickener, and in pill formulation.

Many legumes have been used in folk medicine (Duke, 1992; Kindscher, 1992). Isoflavones from soybeans and other legumes have more recently been suggested both to reduce the risks of cancer and to lower serum cholesterol (Kennedy, 1995; Molteni et al., 1995). Soybean and soyfood phytoestrogens have been suggested as possible alternatives to hormone replacement therapy for postmenopausal women.

Several U.S. cities and states now require that fleet vehicles be powered in part by biodiesel fuel from soybean. Some states require that biodiesel be included at a fixed percentage in all diesel fuels (http://www.biodiesel.org).

BIOLOGICAL N FIXATION

A hallmark trait of legumes is their ability to develop root nodules and to fix N2 in symbiosis with compatible rhizobia. This is often a critical factor in their suitability for the uses outlined above.

Formation of symbiotically effective root nodules involves signaling between host and microsymbiont. Flavonoids and/or isoflavonoids released from the root of the legume host induce transcription of nodulation genes in compatible rhizobia, leading to the formation of lipochitooligosaccharide molecules that, in turn, signal the host plant to begin nodule formation (Long, 1996). Numerous changes occur in host and bacterial gene expression during infection, nodule development, and function (Vance, 2002), with approximately 100 host legume and rhizobial genes involved.

Some 40 to 60 million metric tons (Mt) of N2 are fixed by agriculturally important legumes annually, with another 3 to 5 million Mt fixed by legumes in natural ecosystems (Smil, 1999). This is amazing efficiency given the miniscule quantities of nitrogenase involved (Delwiche, 1970).

Why is symbiotic N fixation in legumes so important? In addition to its role as a source of protein N in the diet, N from legume fixation is essentially “free” N for use by the host plant or by associated or subsequent crops. Replacing it with fertilizer N would cost $7 to 10 billion annually, whereas even modest use of alfalfa in rotation with corn could save farmers in the U.S. $200 to 300 million (Peterson and Russelle, 1991). Furthermore, fertilizer N is frequently unavailable to subsistence farmers, leaving them dependent on N2 fixation by legumes or other N2-fixing organisms.

One of the driving forces behind agricultural sustainability is effective management of N in the environment (Graham and Vance, 2000). Application of fertilizer N increased approximately 10-fold to 90 million Mt between 1950 and 1995 (Frink et al., 1999) with significant energy consumption for N fertilizer synthesis and application. Further increases in N needs for agriculture are projected for the period to 2030 (Tilman, 1999), and these needs will contribute to environmental pollution. To the extent that farming practices can make use of the more economically viable and environmentally prudent N2 fixation (Peoples et al., 1995; Vance, 2001), agriculture and the environment will benefit. The ability of legumes to sequester C has also been seen as a means to offset increases in atmospheric CO2 levels while enhancing soil quality and tilth. Resh et al. (2002) found that soils under N2-fixing trees sequestered 0.11 ± 0.07 kg m2 year−1 of soil organic carbon, whereas there was no change under Eucalyptusspp. Carbon sequestration under Prosopis spp. has also been reported.

Giller (2001) suggests that rates of N2 fixation of 1 to 2 kg N ha−1 growing season day−1should be possible in all legumes. Rates reported by Unkovich and Pate (2000) and van Kessel and Hartley (2000) are clearly less than this, with the latter authors reporting a decline in average N2 fixation rate for both soybean and beans over the period since 1985. Constraints to N2 fixation include drought (Sinclair et al., 1987), soil acidity, N fertilization, and nutrient limitations. Many cultivars also show only limited ability to fix N2 in symbiosis.

Management of soil acidity for temperate and tropical regions has often differed but increasingly depends on acid-tolerant legume cultivars and rhizobia (Howieson et al., 2000), with soil liming only to a pH at which Al and Mn are no longer toxic. Acid soil management was of critical importance in opening the Brasilian Cerrado to agriculture, but it was serendipitous that the acid-tolerantRhizobium tropici could replace other less tolerant bean rhizobia (Hungria et al., 1997). Identification of additional acid-tolerant host and rhizobial germplasm and the deployment of acid tolerance genes such as occur in R. tropici CIAT899 (Graham et al., 1982) are priority areas.

Maximum benefits from N2 fixation depend on soil P availability (Kennedy and Cocking, 1997), with 33% of the world's arable land limited in P (Sanchez and Euhara, 1980). Acid-weathered soils of the tropics and subtropics are particularly prone to P deficiency. Even where P fertilization is adequate, <15% of that P may be taken up by plants in the first year (Holford, 1998). Perhaps of greater concern, reserves of rock phosphate could be depleted in only 60 to 90 years (Abelson, 1999).

Plants dependent on symbiotic N2 fixation have ATP requirements for nodule development and function (Ribet and Drevon, 1996) and need additional P for signal transduction and membrane biosynthesis. Phosphorus concentrations in the nodule are often significantly higher than those in shoot or root tissue (Israel, 1987). Al-Niemi et al. (1997)suggest that bacteroids can be P limited even when plants have received otherwise adequate P levels. Given this requirement for symbiosis, approaches leading to improved P acquisition and use in legumes (rhizosphere acidification, acid phosphatase secretion, root architectural changes at low P, enhanced P transport and use-efficiency, and functional differences in mycorrhizal symbioses) all need further study. White lupine (Lupinus albus) and common bean are excellent model legumes for such studies. Each undergoes change in root architecture and rhizosphere chemistry at low P (Johnson et al., 1996; Nielsen et al., 1998; Miller et al., 2001), improving soil exploration and phosphate scavenging. Transgenic alfalfa has proved extremely useful in understanding the genetic and molecular basis of low soil P, acid, and aluminum stress responses (Tesfaye et al., 2001). Results in this study highlight the need for more effective transformation and regeneration protocols in the more recalcitrant legumes, including bean and cowpea. Progress in the study of nodulation and N2 fixation under drought or salinity stress has been minimal, largely because the legume and the process of nodulation are more susceptible to these constraints than is the microorganism.

SYNOPSIS

Legumes play a critical role in natural ecosystems, agriculture, and agroforestry, where their ability to fix N in symbiosis makes them excellent colonizers of low-N environments, and economic and environmentally friendly crop, pasture, and tree species. Legume yields unfortunately continue to lag behind those of cereals. A research orientation that better balances the needs of third-world or sustainability-oriented agriculture with the breakthrough technologies of genomics and bioinformatics is needed. It requires stronger and more adventurous breeding programs, better use of marker-assisted technologies, and emphasis on disease resistance, enhanced N fixation, and tolerance to edaphic soil constraints. It also requires extension of existing low-cost technologies, such as rhizobial inoculation, to the small farmer. To paraphrase a comment by Catroux et al. (2001) “we enter the era of biotechnology knowing more and more about the growth of legumes at the gene level, but except for some producers in developed countries, unable to effectively translate these into major gains in productivity.”

Footnotes

  • ↵* Corresponding author; e-mail pgraham{at}soils.umn.edu; fax 612–625–2208.

  • www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.017004.

  • Received November 1, 2002.
  • Revision received November 29, 2002.
  • Accepted December 12, 2002.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Abelson PH
    (1999) A potential phosphate crisis. Science 283:2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Al-Niemi TS,
    2. Kahn ML,
    3. McDermott TR
    (1997) P metabolism in the bean Rhizobium tropici symbiosis. Plant Physiol 113:1233–1242.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  3. ↵
    1. Arianoutsou M,
    2. Thanos CA
    (1996) Legumes in the fire-prone Mediterranean regions: an example from Greece. Int J Wildland Fire 6:77–82.
  4. ↵
    Beaver JS, Rosas JC, Myers J, Acosta J, Kelly JD, Nchimbi-Msolla S, Misangu R, Bokosi J, Temple S, Arnaud-Santana E et al. (2003) Contributions of the bean/cowpea CRSP program to cultivar and germplasm development in common bean. Field Crops Res (in press)
    1. Ashton MS,
    2. Montagnini F
    1. Bryan JA
    (2000) Nitrogen-fixing trees and shrubs: a basic resource of agroforestry. in The Silvicultural Basis for Agroforestry Systems. eds Ashton MS, Montagnini F (CRC Press, Baton Rouge, LA), pp 41–60.
  5. ↵
    1. Buresh RJ,
    2. Cooper PJM
    (1999) The science and practice of short-term improved fallows. Agrofor Syst 47:1–356.
  6. ↵
    1. Buresh RJ,
    2. Sanchez PA,
    3. Calhoun F
    (1997) Replenishing Soil Fertility in Africa. Special Publication 51, (Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI).
  7. ↵
    1. Cassman KG
    (1999) Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality and precision agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5952–5959.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Catroux G,
    2. Hartmann A,
    3. Revellin C
    (2001) Trends in rhizobial inoculant production and use. Plant Soil 230:21–30.
  9. ↵
    1. Cohen MN
    (1977) The Food Crisis in Prehistory: Overpopulation and the Origins of Agriculture. (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
  10. ↵
    Coyne DP, Steadman JR, Godoy-Lutz G, Gilbertson R, Arnaud-Santana EA, Beaver JS, Myers JR (2003) Contributions of the bean/cowpea CRSP to the management of bean diseases. Field Crops Res (in press)
  11. ↵
    1. Dakora FD,
    2. Lawlor DW,
    3. Sibuga KP
    (1999) Assessment of symbiotic nitrogen nutrition in marama bean (Tylosema esculenta L.) a tuber-producing underutilized African grain legume. Symbiosis 27:269–277.
  12. ↵
    1. de Faria SM,
    2. Lewis GP,
    3. Sprent JI,
    4. Sutherland JM
    (1989) Occurrence of nodulation in the leguminosae. New Phytol 111:607–619.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. de Leeuw PN,
    2. Mohamed-Saleem MA,
    3. Salati E
    (1994) Stylosanthes as a Forage and Fallow Crop. (International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia).
  14. ↵
    1. Delwiche CC
    (1970) The nitrogen cycle. Sci Am 223:136–146.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Duke JA
    (1992) Handbook of Legumes of Economic Importance. (Plenum Press, New York).
  16. ↵
    1. Duranti M,
    2. Gius C
    (1997) Legume seeds: protein content and nutritional value. Field Crops Res 53:31–45.
  17. ↵
    1. Ekanayake S,
    2. Jansz ER,
    3. Nair BM
    (2000) Literature review of an underutilized legume: Canavalia gladiata L. Plant Sources Human Nutr 55:305–321.
  18. ↵
    1. Franzluebbers K,
    2. Hossner LR,
    3. Juo ASR
    (1998) Integrated Nutrient Management for Sustained Crop Production in Sub-Saharan Agriculture. A Review. Trop Soils Texas A&M University Technol. Bull 98–03. (Texas A&M University, College Station).
    1. Fred EB,
    2. Baldwin IL,
    3. McCoy E
    (1932) Root nodule bacteria and leguminous plants. (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison).
  19. ↵
    1. Frink CR,
    2. Waggoner PE,
    3. Ausubel SH
    (1999) Nitrogen fertilizer: retrospect and prospect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1175–1180.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Garcia MC,
    2. Marina ML,
    3. Laborda F,
    4. Torre M
    (1998) Chemical characterization of commercial soybean products. Food Chem 62:325–331.
  21. ↵
    1. Gathumbi SM,
    2. Ndufa JK,
    3. Giller KE,
    4. Cadisch G
    (2002) Do species mixtures increase above- and below-ground resource capture in woody and herbaceous tropical legumes? Agron J 94:518–526.
  22. ↵
    1. Genta HD,
    2. Genta ML,
    3. Alvarez NV,
    4. Santana MS
    (2002) Production and acceptance of a soy candy. J Food Eng 53:199–202.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Giller KE
    (2001) Nitrogen fixation in tropical cropping systems. (CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK).
  24. ↵
    1. Graham PH
    (1992) Stress tolerance in Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium, and nodulation under adverse soil conditions. Can J Microbiol 38:475–484.
  25. ↵
    1. Graham PH,
    2. Vance CP
    (2000) Nitrogen fixation in perspective: an overview of research and extension needs. Field Crops Res 65:93–106.
  26. ↵
    1. Graham PH,
    2. Viteri SE,
    3. Mackie F,
    4. Vargas AT,
    5. Palacios A
    (1982) Variation in acid soil tolerance among strains of Rhizobium phaseoli. Field Crops Res 5:121–128.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Nutman PS
    1. Hardy RWF,
    2. Havelka UD
    (1976) Photosynthate as a major factor limiting nitrogen fixation by field-grown legumes with an emphasis on soybeans. in Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Plants. ed Nutman PS (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), pp 421–439.
  28. ↵
    1. Henriksen I,
    2. Michelsen A,
    3. Schlonvoigt A
    (2002) Tree species selection and soil tillage in alley cropping systems with Phaseolus vulgaris L. in a humid premontane climate: biomass production, nutrient cycling and crop responses. Plant Soil 240:145–159.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Holford ICR
    (1998) Soil phosphorus: its measurement and uptake by plants. Aust J Soil Res 35:227–239.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Howieson JG,
    2. Loi A,
    3. Carr SJ
    (1995) Biserrula pelecinus L.: a legume pasture species with potential for acid duplex soils which is nodulated by unique root-nodule bacteria. Aust J Agric Res 46:997–1009.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Howieson JG,
    2. O'Hara GW,
    3. Carr SJ
    (2000) Changing roles for legumes in Mediterranean agriculture: developments from an Australian perspective. Field Crops Res 65:107–122.
  32. ↵
    1. Hungria M,
    2. Andrade DD,
    3. Colozzi A,
    4. Balota EL
    (1997) Interactions among soil organisms and bean and maize grown in monoculture or intercropped. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 32:807–818.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Wilcox JR
    1. Hymowitz T,
    2. Singh RJ
    (1987) Taxonomy and speciation. in Soybeans: Improvement, Production and Uses. Agronomy Monograph 16. ed Wilcox JR (American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI), pp 23–48.
  34. ↵
    1. Israel DW
    (1987) Investigation of the role of phosphorus in symbiotic dinitrogen fixation. Plant Physiol 84:835–840.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  35. ↵
    1. Jeuffroy MH,
    2. Ney B
    (1997) Crop physiology and productivity. Field Crops Res 53:3–16.
  36. ↵
    1. Johnson JF,
    2. Vance CP,
    3. Allan DL
    (1996) Phosphorus deficiency in Lupinus albus-altered lateral root development and enhanced expression of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase. Plant Physiol 112:31–41.
  37. ↵
    1. Kaplan L,
    2. Lynch TF
    (1999) Phaseolus (Fabaceae) in archeology: AMS radiocarbon dates and their significance in pre-Colombian agriculture. Econ Bot 53:261–272.
  38. ↵
    Kelly JD, Gepts P, Miklas PN, Coyne DP (2003) Tagging and mapping of genes and QTL and molecular marker-assisted selection for traits of economic importance in bean and cowpea. Field Crops Res (in press)
  39. ↵
    1. Kennedy AR
    (1995) The evidence for soybean products as cancer preventative agents. J Nutr 125:S733–S743.
  40. ↵
    1. Kennedy IR,
    2. Cocking EC
    , eds (1997) Biological Nitrogen Fixation: The Global Challenge and Future Needs. Rockefeller Foundation Bellagio Conference Proceedings. (SUN Fix Press, University of Sydney, Sydney), p 83.
  41. ↵
    1. Kindscher K
    (1992) Medicinal Wild Plants of the Prairie. (University Press of Kansas, Lawrence).
  42. ↵
    1. Knight R
    1. Ladizinsky G,
    2. Smartt J
    (2000) Opportunities for improved adaptation via further domestication. in Linking Research and Marketing Opportunities for Pulses in the 21st Century. ed Knight R (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), pp 257–263.
  43. ↵
    1. Long SR
    (1996) Rhizobium symbiosis: nod factors in perspective. Plant Cell 8:1885–1898.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Miller SS,
    2. Liu JQ,
    3. Allan DL,
    4. Menzhuber CJ,
    5. Fedorova M,
    6. Vance CP
    (2001) Molecular control of acid phosphatase secretion into the rhizosphere of proteoid roots from phosphorus-stressed white lupin. Plant Physiol 127:594–606.
  45. ↵
    1. Molteni A,
    2. Brizio-Molteni L,
    3. Persky V
    (1995) In vitro hormonal effects of soybean isoflavones. J Nutr 125:S751–S756.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. ↵
    1. Morris JB
    (1997) Special purpose legume genetic resources conserved for agricultural, industrial and pharmaceutical use. Econ Bot 51:251–263.
    1. National Academy of Science
    (1994) Biological Nitrogen Fixation. (National Academy Press, Washington, DC).
  47. ↵
    1. Nielsen KL,
    2. Miller CR,
    3. Beck D,
    4. Lynch JP
    (1998) Fractal geometry of root systems: field observations of contrasting genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown under different phosphorus regimes. Plant Soil 206:181–190.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Muehlbauer FJ,
    2. Keyser WJ
    1. Oram PA,
    2. Agcaoili M
    (1992) Current status and future trends in supply and demand of cool-season food legumes. in Expanding the Production and Use of Cool Season Food Legumes. eds Muehlbauer FJ, Keyser WJ (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), pp 3–52.
  49. ↵
    1. Paetau I,
    2. Chen CZ,
    3. Jane JL
    (1994) Biodegradable plastic made from soybean products: 1. Effect of preparation and processing on mechanical properties and water absorption. Indust Eng Chem Res 33:1821–1827.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Pearson HL,
    2. Vitousek PM
    (2001) Stand dynamics, nitrogen accumulations, and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in regenerating stands of Acacia koa. Ecol Appl 11:1381–1394.
  51. ↵
    1. Peoples MB,
    2. Herridge DF,
    3. Ladha JK
    (1995) Biological nitrogen fixation: an efficient source of nitrogen for sustainable agricultural production. Plant Soil 174:3–28.
  52. ↵
    1. Peterson TA,
    2. Russelle MP
    (1991) Alfalfa and the nitrogen cycle in the corn belt. J Soil Water Conserv 46:229–235.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    1. Polhill RM,
    2. Raven PH
    1. Polhill RM,
    2. Raven PH,
    3. Stirton CH
    (1981) Evolution and systematics of the Leguminosae. in Advances in Legume Systematics Part 1. eds Polhill RM, Raven PH (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK), pp 1–26.
  54. ↵
    1. Popenoe H,
    2. King SR,
    3. Leon J,
    4. Kalinowski LS
    (1989) Lost crops of the Incas. (National Academy Press, Washington, DC), p 415.
  55. ↵
    1. Postel SL
    (2000) Entering an era of water scarcity. Ecol Appl 10:941–948.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Reich PB,
    2. Tilman D,
    3. Craine J,
    4. Ellsworth D,
    5. Tjoelker MG,
    6. Knops J,
    7. Wedin D,
    8. Naeem S,
    9. Bahauddin D,
    10. Goth J,
    11. et al
    (2001) Do species and functional groups differ in acquisition and use of C, N and water under varying atmospheric CO2 and N availability regimes? A field test with 16 grassland species. New Phytol 150:435–448.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  57. ↵
    1. Resh SC,
    2. Binkley D,
    3. Parrotta JA
    (2002) Greater soil carbon sequestration under nitrogen-fixing trees compared with Eucalyptus species. Ecosystems 5:217–231.
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. Ribet J,
    2. Drevon JJ
    (1996) The phosphorus requirement of N2 fixing and urea-fed Acacia mangium. New Phytol 132:383–390.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. ↵
    1. Roosevelt AC,
    2. Dacosta ML,
    3. Brown LJ,
    4. Douglas JE,
    5. Odonnell M,
    6. Quinn E,
    7. Kemp J,
    8. Machado CL,
    9. Dasilveira MI,
    10. Feathers J,
    11. et al
    (1996) Paleo-indian cave dwellers in the Amazon: the peopling of the Americas. Science 272:373–384.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Russelle M
    (2001) Alfalfa. Am Sci 89:252–259.
  61. ↵
    1. Sanchez PA
    (1999) Improved fallows come of age in the tropics. Agrofor Syst 47:3–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Sanchez PA
    (2002) Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. Science 295:2019–2020.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Khasawneh FE,
    2. Sample EC,
    3. Kamprath EJ
    1. Sanchez PA,
    2. Euhara G
    (1980) Management considerations for acid soils with high phosphorus fixation capacity. in The Role of Phosphorus in Agriculture. eds Khasawneh FE, Sample EC, Kamprath EJ (American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI), pp 471–514.
  64. ↵
    1. Seastedt TR,
    2. Knapp AK
    (1993) Consequences of nonequilibrium resource availability across multiple time scales: the transient maxima hypothesis. Am Nat 141:621–633.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. ↵
    1. Sinclair TR,
    2. Muchow RC,
    3. Bennet JM,
    4. Hammond LC
    (1987) Relative sensitivity of nitrogen and biomass accumulation to drought in field-grown soybean. Agron J 79:986–991.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. ↵
    1. Smil V
    (1999) Nitrogen in crop production. Global Biogeochem Cycles 13:647–662.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  67. ↵
    1. Spehar CR
    (1995) Impact of strategic genes in soybean on agricultural development in the Brazilian tropical savannahs. Field Crops Res 41:141–146.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    1. Spehn EM,
    2. Scher-Lorensen M,
    3. Schmid B,
    4. Hector A,
    5. Caldiera MC,
    6. Dimitrakopoulos PG,
    7. Finn JA,
    8. Jumpponen A,
    9. O'Donnovan G,
    10. Pereira JS,
    11. et al
    (2002) The role of legumes as a component of biodiversity in a cross-European study of grassland biomass nitrogen. Oikos 98:205–218.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  69. ↵
    1. Sprent JI,
    2. Parsons R
    (2000) Nitrogen fixation in legume and non-legume trees. Field Crops Res 65:183–196.
  70. ↵
    1. Tesfaye M,
    2. Temple SJ,
    3. Allan DL,
    4. Vance CP,
    5. Samac DA
    (2001) Overexpressing of malate dehydrogenase in transgenic alfalfa enhances organic acid synthesis and confers tolerance to aluminum. Plant Physiol 127:1836–1844.
  71. ↵
    1. Teyssonneyre F,
    2. Picon-Cochard C,
    3. Falcimagne R,
    4. Soussana JF
    (2002) Effects of elevated CO2 and cutting frequency on plant community structure in a temperate grassland. Global Change Biol 8:1034–1046.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    1. Thomas D,
    2. Sumberg JE
    (1995) A review of the evaluation and use of tropical forage legumes in sub-Saharan Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 54:151–163.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  73. ↵
    1. Thornley JHM,
    2. Bergelson J,
    3. Parsons AJ
    (1995) Complex dynamics in a carbon nitrogen model of a grass legume pasture. Ann Bot 75:79–94.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    1. Tilman D
    (1999) Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5995–6000.
  75. ↵
    1. Unkovich MJ,
    2. Pate JS
    (2000) An appraisal of recent field measurements of symbiotic N2 fixation by annual legumes. Field Crops Res 65:211–222.
  76. ↵
    1. Vance CP
    (2001) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition: plant nutrition in a world of declining renewable resources. Plant Physiol 127:390–397.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  77. ↵
    1. Waisel Y,
    2. Eshel A,
    3. Kafkati U
    1. Vance CP
    (2002) Root-bacteria interactions: symbiotic nitrogen fixation. in Plant Roots: The Hidden Half, eds Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkati U (Marcel Dekker Publishers, New York), Ed 3, pp 839–867.
  78. ↵
    1. Pedrosa FO,
    2. Hungria M,
    3. Yates MG,
    4. Newton WE
    1. Vance CP,
    2. Graham PH,
    3. Allan DL
    (2000) Biological nitrogen fixation. Phosphorus: a critical future need. in Nitrogen Fixation: From Molecules to Crop Productivity. eds Pedrosa FO, Hungria M, Yates MG, Newton WE (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), pp 506–514.
  79. ↵
    1. van Kessel C,
    2. Hartley C
    (2000) Agricultural management of grain legumes: Has it led to an increase in nitrogen fixation? Field Crops Res 65:165–181.
  80. ↵
    1. Vitousek PM,
    2. Aber JD,
    3. Howarth RW,
    4. Likens GE,
    5. Matson PA,
    6. Schindler DW,
    7. Schlesinger WH,
    8. Tilman DG
    (1997) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 7:737–750.
  81. ↵
    1. Vitousek PM,
    2. Field CB
    (1999) Ecosystem constraints to symbiotic nitrogen fixers: a simple model and its assumptions. Biogeochemistry 46:179–202.
  82. ↵
    Wattiaux MA, Howard TM (2001) Technical Dairy Guide: Nutrition and Feeding. University of Wisconsin.http://babcock.cals.wisc.edu/de/html/ch6/nutrition_eng_ch6.html
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Physiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Legumes: Importance and Constraints to Greater Use
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Physiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Physiology web site.
Citation Tools
Legumes: Importance and Constraints to Greater Use
Peter H. Graham, Carroll P. Vance
Plant Physiology Mar 2003, 131 (3) 872-877; DOI: 10.1104/pp.017004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Legumes: Importance and Constraints to Greater Use
Peter H. Graham, Carroll P. Vance
Plant Physiology Mar 2003, 131 (3) 872-877; DOI: 10.1104/pp.017004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • GRAIN AND PASTURE PRODUCTION
    • AGROFORESTRY
    • NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS
    • INDUSTRIAL AND MEDICINAL USE OF LEGUMES
    • BIOLOGICAL N FIXATION
    • SYNOPSIS
    • Footnotes
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

Plant Physiology: 131 (3)
Plant Physiology
Vol. 131, Issue 3
Mar 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Physiology Preview
  • Archive
  • Focus Collections
  • Classic Collections
  • The Plant Cell
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Journal Miles
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2019 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire