Skip to main content

Main menu

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleDEVELOPMENT AND HORMONE ACTION
You have accessRestricted Access

An Arabidopsis pex10 Null Mutant Is Embryo Lethal, Implicating Peroxisomes in an Essential Role during Plant Embryogenesis

Imogen A. Sparkes, Federica Brandizzi, Stephen P. Slocombe, Mahmoud El-Shami, Chris Hawes, Alison Baker
Imogen A. Sparkes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Federica Brandizzi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen P. Slocombe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mahmoud El-Shami
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Hawes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alison Baker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published December 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.031252

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    AtPEX10-YFP fusion localizes to peroxisomes in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaf epidermal cells. A, Tobacco leaf epidermal cells transiently expressing a AtPEX10-YFP fusion. Scale bar = 50 μm. B, Same cells as in A visualized with transmitted light to show cell boundaries. C, Merged image of A and B. D, Higher magnification of structures highlighted with AtPEX10-YFP. Note the absence of fluorescence in the center of these structures (scale bar = 2 μm). E through G, Time-lapse sequence of epidermal cells expressing an AtPEX10-YFP fusion. An arrowhead indicates one of these structures covering a greater distance in comparison with other AtPEX10-YFP bodies present in the same field of view. Time is expressed in seconds at the top right of each frame. Scale bar = 10 μm. H through J, Leaf epidermal cells transiently expressing a GFP-SKL fusion imaged with GFP settings of the confocal microscope (H; scale bar = 50 μm). Inset in H represents a higher magnification comparable with that in D. I, Same cells as in H imaged with transmitted light. The two images are merged in J. K through N, Colocalization of GFP and YFP fusions in epidermal cells of a leaf in which a mixed population of Agrobacterium tumefaciens bearing AtPEX10-YFP and GFP-SKL constructs was inoculated. K, AtPEX10-YFP expression. Scale bar = 20 μm. L, Same cells as in K showing GFP-SKL expression. M, Transmitted light image of cells pictured in K and L. N, In a merged image of K through M, it is possible to identify cells that are coexpressing AtPEX10-YFP and GFP-SKL. In these cells, AtPEX10-YFP colocalizes with peroxisomes highlighted with GFP-SKL (arrowheads).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Arabidopsis PEX10 is expressed in a range of tissues. RT-PCR of AtPEX10 from Arabidopsis tissues (indicated above lanes) shows that AtPEX10 is widely expressed. The primers used were P4 and P11, and the expected size of AtPEX10 amplified product is 1.2 kbp.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Location and segregation of the dissociation element (Ds) in the Atpex10 line. A, Schematic of genomic sequence of AtPEX10, boxes refer to exons. The Ds element is located in exon 4, and primers used to determine location and orientation of the Ds element in AtPEX10 are displayed. B, Arabidopsis PEX10 (AJ276134) is predicted to have two transmembrane domains (underlined) and a conserved zinc RING finger at the carboxy terminus (boxed residues). The section in bold italics represents the part of the protein that could theoretically be translated from the mutant allele. Five PCR products derived from independent PCR reactions were sequenced. All five contained the substitution M184K relative to the previously published sequences AC002505 and AF119572. In addition, the substitution P199L was found in four out of the five independent PCR products, but the E357K mutation was found in only one PCR product. Therefore, it seems likely that M184K and P199L are genuine polymorphisms, but E357K is a PCR-induced mutation. These three substitutions are shown in bold type. C, Genomic extracts from seven progeny from selfed Atpex10 heterozygotes were genotyped. Two PCR reactions per plant were performed with primer combinations P11 and P18 (black arrowhead) and P11 and DS3 (white arrowhead). P11 and P18 amplifies a 910-bp product from the wild-type allele, and P18 and DS3 amplifies a product of 453 bp from the disrupted allele. Two segregating wild-type (WT) and five heterozygotes (Hh) are shown. Water controls and control PCR reactions from genomic DNA from wild-type plants are also shown.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Homozygous Atpex10 mutants are embryo lethal. A and B, Developing seed from siliques from selfed heterozygotes show a higher level of abnormal seeds per silique than seen in wild type. The abnormal seed are white (black arrowhead) or brown and shriveled (white arrowhead). Scale bar = 0.2 mm. C, Embryos were dissected from the developing seed and were genotyped by PCR. Two PCR reactions per embryo were performed using primers GUS1 and GUS2 (white arrowhead) or EM1 and EM2 (black arrowhead). GUS1 and GUS2 amplifies a 1.5-kbp product from the disrupted Atpex10 allele; EM1 and EM2 amplifies a 755-bp product from the wild-type allele.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Mutants show developmental delay. A, RT-PCR with AtPEX10-specific primers was performed on whole seed from wild-type plants 2 d postflowering. Normarski image of developing embryo shows that at 2 d postflowering, embryos are at early globular stage of development. The amplified products were blotted and probed with an AtPEX10-specific probe. B through H, Developing seed from selfed heterozygous Atpex10 plants were removed from the silique and viewed using Normarski optics. Seeds were separated based on normal (B and D) or abnormal (C, and E through H) external appearance, where B and C are from the same silique and D and E are from the same silique. F through H are from siliques containing morphologically normal embryos at the same developmental stage as D. Embryos in normal seeds are at a later developmental stage to embryos in abnormal seeds from the same silique, and some of the abnormal embryos appear to be larger (compare E with G, and F with H). Scale bar: A through E = 10 μm; F through H = 50 μm.

PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Physiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Arabidopsis pex10 Null Mutant Is Embryo Lethal, Implicating Peroxisomes in an Essential Role during Plant Embryogenesis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Physiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Physiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
An Arabidopsis pex10 Null Mutant Is Embryo Lethal, Implicating Peroxisomes in an Essential Role during Plant Embryogenesis
Imogen A. Sparkes, Federica Brandizzi, Stephen P. Slocombe, Mahmoud El-Shami, Chris Hawes, Alison Baker
Plant Physiology Dec 2003, 133 (4) 1809-1819; DOI: 10.1104/pp.103.031252

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
An Arabidopsis pex10 Null Mutant Is Embryo Lethal, Implicating Peroxisomes in an Essential Role during Plant Embryogenesis
Imogen A. Sparkes, Federica Brandizzi, Stephen P. Slocombe, Mahmoud El-Shami, Chris Hawes, Alison Baker
Plant Physiology Dec 2003, 133 (4) 1809-1819; DOI: 10.1104/pp.103.031252
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

Plant Physiology: 133 (4)
Plant Physiology
Vol. 133, Issue 4
Dec 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • An Endogenous Carbon-Sensing Pathway Triggers Increased Auxin Flux and Hypocotyl Elongation
  • Differential Control of Ethylene Responses by GREEN-RIPE and GREEN-RIPE LIKE1 Provides Evidence for Distinct Ethylene Signaling Modules in Tomato
  • The AINTEGUMENTA LIKE1 Homeotic Transcription Factor PtAIL1 Controls the Formation of Adventitious Root Primordia in Poplar
Show more DEVELOPMENT AND HORMONE ACTION

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Physiology Preview
  • Archive
  • Focus Collections
  • Classic Collections
  • The Plant Cell
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Journal Miles
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire