Skip to main content

Main menu

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
CorrectionCorrection
You have accessRestricted Access

CORRECTION

Published September 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.900172

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2005 American Society of Plant Biologists

The authors of the articles listed below discovered an error in a spreadsheet developed by their laboratory. This error resulted in an incorrect conversion of radioactive counts to the appropriate molar units. The absence of a 1,000-fold difference led them to report their auxin transport values as pmol instead of reporting them correctly as fmol. The following articles were affected by this conversion error.

Vol. 122: 481–490

Rashotte A.M., Brady S.R., Reed R.C., Ante S.J., and Muday G.K. Basipetal Auxin Transport Is Required for Gravitropism in Roots of Arabidopsis.

The units of radioactive indole-3-acetic acid transport were mislabeled in Figure 3 and Tables II and IV, as were the units of radiolabeled benzoic acid in Tables II and IV. Both control and experimental values should have been reported as fmol rather than pmol. This change in units does not alter the interpretation of the data since all experiments had internal controls.

Vol. 133: 761–772

Rashotte A.M., Poupart J., Waddell C.S., and Muday G.K. Transport of the Two Natural Auxins, Indole-3-Butyric Acid and Indole-3-Acetic Acid, in Arabidopsis.

The units of radioactive indole-3-acetic acid and indole-3-butyric acid transport were mislabeled in Figures 1 to 4 and Tables I to III and in the text on page 764. Both control and experimental values should have been reported as fmol rather than pmol. This change in units does not alter the interpretation of the data since all experiments had internal controls. The one exception to this change is the inflorescence transport data reported in Table I, which are correctly reported as pmol and are consistent with greater amounts of indole-3-acetic acid transport in the inflorescence. Additionally, the higher number of counts in the inflorescence data in Table I is also due to the higher amounts of radioactive auxin added. The amount of added radioactivity in this continuous pulse of auxin in the inflorescence assay was incorrectly reported in the methods as 100 nm and should have been reported as 333 nm.

PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Physiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CORRECTION
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Physiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Physiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
CORRECTION
Plant Physiology Sep 2005, 139 (1) 559; DOI: 10.1104/pp.104.900172

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
CORRECTION
Plant Physiology Sep 2005, 139 (1) 559; DOI: 10.1104/pp.104.900172
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

Plant Physiology: 139 (1)
Plant Physiology
Vol. 139, Issue 1
September 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • CORRECTION
  • CORRECTION
  • CORRECTION
Show more CORRECTIONS

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Physiology Preview
  • Archive
  • Focus Collections
  • Classic Collections
  • The Plant Cell
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Journal Miles
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire