Skip to main content

Main menu

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleCELL BIOLOGY AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
You have accessRestricted Access

Characterization of a Grapevine R2R3-MYB Transcription Factor That Regulates the Phenylpropanoid Pathway

Laurent Deluc, François Barrieu, Chloé Marchive, Virginie Lauvergeat, Alain Decendit, Tristan Richard, Jean-Pierre Carde, Jean-Michel Mérillon, Saïd Hamdi
Laurent Deluc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
François Barrieu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chloé Marchive
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Virginie Lauvergeat
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alain Decendit
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tristan Richard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Pierre Carde
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Michel Mérillon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saïd Hamdi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published February 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.067231

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Scheme of branch pathways of phenylpropanoid metabolism in plants leading to the synthesis of anthocyanins, flavonols, PAs, and lignin. Enzymes that function in multiple or specific pathways are indicated. Abbreviations are as follows: ANR, anthocyanidin reductase; ANS/LDOX, anthocyanidin synthase; CAD, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase; C4H, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; CCR, cinnamyl-CoA reductase; C3H, 4-coumarate 3-hydroxylase; 4CL, 4-coumarate-CoA ligase; CHS, chalcone synthase; CHI, chalcone isomerase; COMT, caffeic acid O-methyltransferase; DFR, dihydroflavonol 4-reductase; F3H, flavanone 3-hydroxylase; F3′H, flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase; F5H, ferulate 5-hydroxylase; FLS, flavonol synthase; 3GT (UFGT), UDPG-flavonoid-3-O-glucosyltransferase; LAR, leucoanthocyanidin reductase; LDOX, leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase; PAL, Phe ammonia-lyase; 3RT, anthocyanidin-3-glucoside rhamnosyl transferase.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Features of VvMYB5a protein. A, Schematic representation of the major functional domains in the VvMYB5a protein based on data derived from sequence comparisons. R2 and R3 are the two repeats of the MYB DNA-binding domain (DBD). The IR domain corresponds to the residues involved in putative interaction with MYC proteins (glutamine-rich domain [GRD]). B, Phylogenetic analysis of a selection of plant MYB proteins was performed by using a BLAST algorithm on the GenBank and EMBL databases. The VvMYB5a protein sequence was aligned to known plant MYB sequences, and their distance relationships were resolved using the neighbor-joining tree-building method. The human protein c-MYB is used as an outgroup. See “Materials and Methods” for accession numbers.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    VvMYB5a expression in grapevine tissues. Southern blots of semiquantitative RT-PCR products blotted onto nylon membrane and hybridized with the radiolabeled VvMYB5a 3′-UTR probe. Elongation factor EF1-γ was used as a control. A, Expression of VvMYB5a during grape berry development (berry flesh and skin). B, Expression of VvMYB5a in berry tissues. C, Expression of VvMYB5a in grapevine tissues harvested from fruit cutting.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Analysis of general phenylpropanoid gene expression in leaves of transgenic tobacco overexpressing VvMYB5a. A, Transcripts for three biosynthetic genes of the general phenylpropanoid metabolism (PAL, C4H, and 4CL) were detected by semiquantitative RT-PCR in leaves from three VvMYB5a independent lines (A–C) and compared to wild-type lines. VvMYB5a indicates the transgene expression level. UBI was used as a quantitative control. B, Quantification of the RT-PCR results shown in A was performed by measuring the intensity per millimeters squared (Quantity One software; Bio-Rad) of the bands and calculating the ratios between the bands in the gene-specific blot and its corresponding band in the UBI control blot (transcript ratio). Data are means ± se of two semiquantitative RT-PCR experiments from two independent RNA extractions. Asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference from wild-type plants (P ≤ 0.01; Student's t test).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Accumulation of phenylpropanoid compounds in VvMYB5a-overexpressing plants. Flowers of transgenic plants (B) showed a clear phenotypic change in petal and stamen pigmentation compared to wild-type flowers (A). Increased pigmentation is observed in petal epidermal cells of transgenic plants (F) compared to control lines (E). A strong red pigmentation is also observed in transgenic stamen epidermal cells (D and H) compared to wild-type stamens (C and G). DMACA staining of petal cells (J) and seed coats (L) from transgenic lines show CT accumulation compared to control petals (I) and seeds (K). E to J, Bars = 50 μm.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    HPLC analysis of methanolic extracts from control and VvMYB5a petals and stamens. A, HPLC chromatograms at 521 nm from transgenic (VvMYB5a) and control (wild-type) petals. B, HPLC chromatograms at 521 nm from transgenic (VvMYB5a) and control (wild-type) stamens. Peaks 1, 2, and 4 are unknown. Peak 3 corresponds to cyanidin-3-rhamnoglucoside and peak 5 corresponds to quercitin-3-rhamnoglucoside. Each chromatogram has been obtained from the same injected quantity of sample (0.375 mg dry weight).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Analysis of transcript accumulation in flowers of transgenic tobacco overexpressing VvMYB5a. A, Transcripts for four flavonoid biosynthetic genes (CHS, CHI, F3H, and DFR) were detected by semiquantitative RT-PCR in petals from three VvMYB5a independent lines (A–C) and compared to wild-type lines. VvMYB5a indicates the transgene expression level. UBI was used as a quantitative control. B, Quantification of the RT-PCR results shown in A was performed by measuring the intensity per millimeters squared (Quantity One software; Bio-Rad) of the bands and calculating the ratios between the bands in the gene-specific blot and its corresponding band in the UBI control blot (transcript ratio). Data are means ± se of two semiquantitative RT-PCR experiments from two independent RNA extractions. Asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference from wild-type plants (P ≤ 0.01; Student's t test). C, Transcripts for four flavonoid biosynthetic genes (CHS, CHI, F3H, and DFR) were detected by semiquantitative RT-PCR in stamens from three VvMYB5a independent lines (A–C) and compared to wild-type lines. VvMYB5a indicates the transgene expression level. UBI was used as a quantitative control. D, Quantification of the RT-PCR results shown in C was performed by measuring the intensity per millimeters squared (Quantity One software; Bio-Rad) of the bands and calculating the ratios between the bands in the gene-specific blot and its corresponding band in the UBI control blot (transcript ratio). Data are means ± se of two semiquantitative RT-PCR experiments from two independent RNA extractions. Asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference from wild-type plants (P ≤ 0.01; Student's t test). E, Northern-blot analysis of ANS gene expression in petals and stamens from wild-type and VvMYB5a lines. Total RNA was extracted from tissues harvested at the opening of flowers. Experiments were repeated with three VvMYB5a and wild-type lines with similar results.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Modification of monolignol metabolism in transgenic anthers. A, Cross sections of anthers at stage 10 from wild-type (I–III) and VvMYB5a-overexpressing tobacco plants (IV–VI). Arrows indicate endothecial cells developing complete (II) or incomplete (V) lignified fibers (shown more enlarged in III and VI, respectively). ep, Epidermis; end, endothecium. Bars = 500 μm (I and IV), 100 μm (II and V), and 20 μm (III and VI). B, Transcripts for monolignol biosynthetic genes (COMT, CAD, and CCoAOMT1, 5, and 6) were detected by semiquantitative RT-PCR in stamens from three VvMYB5a independent lines (A–C) and compared to wild-type lines. VvMYB5a indicates the transgene expression level. UBI was used as quantitative control. C, Quantification of the RT-PCR results shown in B was performed by measuring the intensity per millimeters squared (Quantity One software; Bio-Rad) of the bands and calculating the ratios between the bands in the gene-specific blot and its corresponding band in the UBI control blot (transcript ratio). Data are means ± se of two semiquantitative RT-PCR experiments from two independent RNA extractions. Asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference from the wild-type plants (P ≤ 0.01; Student's t test).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table I.

    Epicatechin and catechin content (milligrams per gram fresh weight tissue) of wild-type and transgenic plants from petal extracts

    Quantitative determination of catechin and epicatechin content in tobacco flowers has been performed by HPLC. The eluate was monitored at 280 nm. Purified standards of catechin and epicatechin were used as controls. Data are the means ± sd of two replicates. N.D., Not detected.

    SampleCatechinEpicatechin
    VvMYB5a line AN.D.10.05 ± 0.56a
    VvMYB5a line BN.D.11.22 ± 0.47a
    VvMYB5a line CN.D.9.35 ± 0.64a
    Wild-type plantsN.D.1.18 ± 0.43
    • ↵a Significantly different from wild type (P < 0.005; Student's t test).

    • View popup
    Table II.

    Total anthocyanin content (milligrams per gram dry weight tissue) of wild-type and transgenic plants from stamen and petal extract

    Quantitative determination of total anthocyanin content in tobacco flowers has been performed by spectrophotometry at 535 nm. A purified standard of keracyanin was used as a control. Data are the means ± sd of four replicates. N.D., Not detected.

    SampleStamensPetals
    VvMYB5a line A4.93 ± 0.073.51 ± 0.12a
    VvMYB5a line B4.20 ± 0.093.42 ± 0.07a
    VvMYB5a line C3.86 ± 0.083.24 ± 0.08a
    Wild-type controlN.D.1.48 ± 0.26
    • ↵a Significantly different from wild type (P < 0.001; Student's t test).

    • View popup
    Table III.

    Keracyanin content (milligrams per gram dry weight tissue) of wild-type and transgenic plants from stamen and petal extract

    Quantitative determination of keracyanin content in tobacco flowers has been performed by HPLC. The eluate was monitored at 521 nm. A purified standard of keracyanin was used as a control. Data are the means ± sd of four replicates. N.D., Not detected.

    SampleStamensPetals
    VvMYB5a line A3.81 ± 0.412.20 ± 0.05a
    VvMYB5a line B3.54 ± 0.392.02 ± 0.04a
    VvMYB5a line C3.42 ± 0.311.99 ± 0.12a
    Wild-type plantsN.D.1.18 ± 0.42
    • ↵a Significantly different from wild type (P < 0.01; Student's t test).

    • View popup
    Table IV.

    Primers for RT-PCR analysis

    GenesAccession No.Sense PrimersAntisense Primers
    Nt-PALD174675′-GCCAACAGGATAAAAGAATGC5′-TCCCACAATATAAGCCCAAGC
    Nt-4CLU508455′-CACACTGGCCACATTGGGTTCATT5′-TTCGCCCGTTGCCAAACTGGAAAT
    Nt-CHSAF3117835′-CCTTTGGGAATTTCTGATTGG5′-TCCCACAATATAAGCCCAAGC
    Nt-F3HAF0361695′-AGCTAGAGACTACTCCAGGTG5′-AACCGTGATCCAAGTTTTGCCA
    Nt-COMTX744535′-CTTGGAGGATTAAGCAATATA5′-AAGCTTTTTCCTAACACACTGC
    Nt-CADX623435′-ACTGCAATGGAGAGGTTTGGAG5′-TACATAAACGTCACTCTCGATCAC
    Nt-CCoAOMT-1U386125′-AACCGGGAAAACTACGAGATTGGT5′-TCTTGGTTGCCACAAATGACGAT
    Nt-CCoAOMT-5AF0227755′-GGGTACTCCCTCCTTGCTACTGCC5′-ATATTGGAATGATCAGGTGATGCG
    Nt-CCoAOMT-6Z562825′-GACAACACCCTATGGAATGG5′-ATAGCGATAATCATGAGATAC
    Nt-UBIU662645′-TCCAGGACAAGGAGGGTAT5′-GAGACCTCAGTAGACAAAGC
    VvMYB5a-3′-UTRAY5551905′-CCCCACCCAGCAATTTCTGTG5′-CCATTTCACATACGATATTCACAC
    Vv-EF-γAF1764965′-GCGGGCAAGAGATACCTCAA5′-TCAATCTGTCTAGGAAAGGAAG

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Supplemental Tables

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data - Supplemental Table I
    • Supplemental Data - Supplemental Table II
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Physiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characterization of a Grapevine R2R3-MYB Transcription Factor That Regulates the Phenylpropanoid Pathway
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Physiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Physiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Characterization of a Grapevine R2R3-MYB Transcription Factor That Regulates the Phenylpropanoid Pathway
Laurent Deluc, François Barrieu, Chloé Marchive, Virginie Lauvergeat, Alain Decendit, Tristan Richard, Jean-Pierre Carde, Jean-Michel Mérillon, Saïd Hamdi
Plant Physiology Feb 2006, 140 (2) 499-511; DOI: 10.1104/pp.105.067231

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Characterization of a Grapevine R2R3-MYB Transcription Factor That Regulates the Phenylpropanoid Pathway
Laurent Deluc, François Barrieu, Chloé Marchive, Virginie Lauvergeat, Alain Decendit, Tristan Richard, Jean-Pierre Carde, Jean-Michel Mérillon, Saïd Hamdi
Plant Physiology Feb 2006, 140 (2) 499-511; DOI: 10.1104/pp.105.067231
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

Plant Physiology: 140 (2)
Plant Physiology
Vol. 140, Issue 2
February 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • The Cell Wall of the Arabidopsis Pollen Tube—Spatial Distribution, Recycling, and Network Formation of Polysaccharides
  • Systems Dynamic Modeling of a Guard Cell Cl− Channel Mutant Uncovers an Emergent Homeostatic Network Regulating Stomatal Transpiration
  • Architecture-Based Multiscale Computational Modeling of Plant Cell Wall Mechanics to Examine the Hydrogen-Bonding Hypothesis of the Cell Wall Network Structure Model
Show more CELL BIOLOGY AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Physiology Preview
  • Archive
  • Focus Collections
  • Classic Collections
  • The Plant Cell
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Journal Miles
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire