OtherGENOME ANALYSIS
Open Access

The F-Box Gene Family Is Expanded in Herbaceous Annual Plants Relative to Woody Perennial Plants

Xiaohan Yang, Udaya C. Kalluri, Sara Jawdy, Lee E. Gunter, Tongming Yin, Timothy J. Tschaplinski, David J. Weston, Priya Ranjan, Gerald A. Tuskan

Published November 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.121921

Abstract

F-box proteins are generally responsible for substrate recognition in the Skp1-Cullin-F-box complexes that are involved in protein degradation via the ubiquitin-26S proteasome pathway. In plants, F-box genes influence a variety of biological processes, such as leaf senescence, branching, self-incompatibility, and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. The number of F-box genes in Populus (Populus trichocarpa; approximately 320) is less than half that found in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; approximately 660) or Oryza (Oryza sativa; approximately 680), even though the total number of genes in Populus is equivalent to that in Oryza and 1.5 times that in Arabidopsis. We performed comparative genomics analysis between the woody perennial plant Populus and the herbaceous annual plants Arabidopsis and Oryza in order to explicate the functional implications of this large gene family. Our analyses reveal interspecific differences in genomic distribution, orthologous relationship, intron evolution, protein domain structure, and gene expression. The set of F-box genes shared by these species appear to be involved in core biological processes essential for plant growth and development; lineage-specific differences primarily occurred because of an expansion of the F-box genes via tandem duplications in Arabidopsis and Oryza. The number of F-box genes in the newly sequenced woody species Vitis (Vitis vinifera; 156) and Carica (Carica papaya; 139) is similar to that in Populus, supporting the hypothesis that the F-box gene family is expanded in herbaceous annual plants relative to woody perennial plants. This study provides insights into the relationship between the structure and composition of the F-box gene family in herbaceous and woody species and their associated developmental and physiological features.

The ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent pathway is one of the most elaborate protein degradation systems known. Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins are important in several cellular processes, including targeted protein degradation. Ubiquitination of proteins is commonly carried out by the E3-ubiquitin protein ligase complex specified through an isopeptide linkage between target protein (E3 bound) and ubiquitin (E2 bound). E3 ligases occur in monomeric or multimeric complexes (Mazzucotelli et al., 2006). A well-characterized multiple-subunit E3 ligase in plants is the Skp1-Cullin-F-box (SCF) protein complex (Kipreos and Pagano, 2000; Jin et al., 2005). The multiple steps required for protein ubiquitination, specificity, and deubiquitination are subject to control at many levels. SCF complexes are known to be regulated by the action of the COP9 signalosome, RUB, CAND1, microRNA, and transcriptional/posttranscriptional modification of various component complexes (Chang and Schwechheimer, 2004; Jones-Rhoades et al., 2006).

The distinguishing 50-amino acid F-box domain is a protein motif that functions as a site of protein-protein interaction (Kipreos and Pagano, 2000). F-box proteins are the substrate-recognition components of SCF ubiquitin-protein ligases. In plants, F-box proteins influence leaf senescence and branching (Woo et al., 2001; Stirnberg et al., 2007), flowering (Durfee et al., 2003; Imaizumi et al., 2005), circadian rhythms (Han et al., 2004; Kevei et al., 2006), self-incompatibility (Qiao et al., 2004; Sijacic et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2004; Takayama and Isogai, 2005), phytochrome signaling (Dieterle et al., 2001), and responses to plant growth regulators (abscisic acid, auxin, ethylene, and GA; Dill et al., 2004; Lai et al., 2004; Badescu and Napier, 2006; Binder et al., 2007) and abiotic (Calderon-Villalobos et al., 2007) and biotic (Kim and Delaney, 2002) factors.

Given the diverse set of developmental traits that F-box proteins are known to influence, it could be argued that long-lived woody plants would require a more abundant or elaborate system of protein degradation, when compared with short-lived herbaceous plants. That is, developmental changes in long-lived woody plants associated with juvenile versus mature, vegetative versus reproductive, and dormant versus nondormant states would lead to a more abundant set of F-box proteins. An alternative hypothesis may be that short-lived herbaceous plants would require a more strict, coordinated control of ontology in order to successfully complete development over a brief period of time. As such, short-lived plants would contain a more diverse set of gene regulation mechanisms, including ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent protein degradation, than would long-lived plants. In fact, the F-box gene number is twice as prevalent in the herbaceous annuals Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and Oryza (Oryza sativa) than it is in the perennial Populus (Populus trichocarpa; approximately 620 and approximately 690 versus approximately 300, respectively), even though the number of genes in the Populus genome (45,555) is equivalent to that in the Oryza genome (42,653) and 1.5 times that in the Arabidopsis genome (27,000; Haas et al., 2003; Tuskan et al., 2006; Ouyang et al., 2007). To illuminate the functional and comparative consequences of the aforementioned observation, we compared F-box-containing genes in Arabidopsis, Populus, and Oryza by analysis of phylogenetic relationships, protein domains, gene expression patterns, gene duplication, and intron evolution.

RESULTS

Genome-Wide Identification of F-Box Genes

A HMMER search of a customized database containing the annotated proteins of Arabidopsis (The Arabidopsis Information Resource [TAIR] release 7), Oryza (The Institute for Genomic Research [TIGR] release 5), and Populus (U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute [JGI] release 1.1) using the Pfam HMM profile built from 510 representative seed F-box proteins of diverse organisms, including animals and plants, identified 656 Arabidopsis, 678 Oryza, and 320 Populus predicted proteins (Supplemental Table S1).

In Populus, F-box genes were found evenly distributed across all chromosomes in the genome, with the exception of chromosome XIX, on which the density of F-box genes is significantly lower in comparison with the other chromosomes (Table I ). Of the 320 F-box genes in Populus, 74 (23% of the total) occur as tandem repeats, with the largest array containing four genes. An additional 22% of the total number of F-box genes in Populus was found within segmental duplications that arose as a result of the salicoid whole-genome duplication event experienced by all members of the genus (Tuskan et al., 2006). Moreover, eight F-box genes that are part of two tandem arrays occurred as the result of at least one paralogous duplication.

View this table:
Table I.

Distribution of F-box genes in the Populus genome

The number of F-box genes occurring as tandem repeats in Arabidopsis and Oryza, 236 (36% of the total) and 291 (43%), respectively, is higher than that in Populus, whereas the number of F-box genes occurring as segmental duplicates in Arabidopsis and Oryza, 46 (7%) and 54 (8%), respectively, is substantially lower than that in Populus (Table II ). Interestingly, there are two tandem repeats in Arabidopsis that occur as homologs in Populus and two additional tandem repeats that are homologous in all three species. Each of these arrays contains four genes in tandem order. This suggests that these genomic segments were present in the last shared common ancestor and that this gene family has experienced tandem expansions over the past 120 million years. Finally, in 9% and 18% of the duplications in Arabidopsis and Oryza, respectively, the F-box motifs were missing in one copy of the two duplicates (data not shown), implying that gene diversification and domain loss has occurred after gene duplication.

View this table:
Table II.

Number of F-box genes resulting from segmental and tandem duplications in Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Populus genomes

Segmental duplications are subchromosomal DNA segments with high identity, microsynteny, and shared total length.

Phylogeny and Orthologous Clustering

To examine the relationship among the 1,654 analyzed F-box proteins in Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Populus, a gene-based phylogenetic tree was created using full-length protein sequences (Fig. 1 ). The F-box proteins were divided into 50 distinct phylogenetic groups (designated G01–G50) based on manual delineation of the phylogenetic tree.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

A phylogeny created with the full-length F-box protein sequences in Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Populus. The numbers in the Venn diagram represent the number of genes per ortholog clade. Domain structure types are defined in Figure 3. The interior colored ring corresponds to the distribution of orthologous clades; the colors are as depicted in the Venn diagram. The outer colored ring corresponds to the domain structure distribution.

To identify orthologous clades (i.e. genes originating from a single ancestral gene in the last common ancestor of the compared genomes) among the F-box proteins in the three plant species, a reconciled phylogenetic tree (Supplemental Fig. S1) was constructed by combining the gene tree (Fig. 1) and the species tree (i.e. [[Arabidopsis, Populus], Oryza]). The F-box proteins were then divided into seven clades: AOP (Arabidopsis-Oryza-Populus), AO (Arabidopsis-Oryza), OP (Oryza-Populus), AP (Arabidopsis-Populus), A (Arabidopsis specific), O (Oryza specific), and P (Populus specific). The AOP clade contains genes having orthologs in Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Populus; the AP clade contains genes having orthologs in Arabidopsis and Populus, et cetera. It is noteworthy that the number of genes in the A clade is equivalent to that in the O clade and about six times that in the P clade (Fig. 2A ), suggesting lineage-specific F-box gene expansions in the annual herbaceous species.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Ortholog clades of F-box genes in Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Populus. A, All F-box genes including expressed and unexpressed genes. B, F-box genes with expression evidence. +, ++, and +++ indicate that genes with expression evidence are overrepresented at P ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively, − and −−− indicate underrepresented genes at P ≤ 0.05 and 0.001, respectively, as compared with all F-box genes. Data label: AOP-83-13% represents 83 F-box genes (13% of the total F-box genes in Arabidopsis) found in the AOP clade.

The F-box genes in the A clade occurred more often than expected by chance alone in phylogenetic groups G02, G06, G22b, and G49 (P ≤ 0.001; Table III ; Fig. 1), indicating that these groups of genes may have experienced expansion in Arabidopsis. Examples of well-characterized genes of the A clade include CEGENDUO and SON1 in group G06 and FBX7 in group G22b (Supplemental Table S2). F-box genes in the P clade occurred more often than expected by chance alone in the phylogenetic groups G02, G27, G35, and G39 (P ≤ 0.001). We hypothesize that these groups of genes may be uniquely related to perennial or woody habit. The AOP clade is overrepresented in the phylogenetic groups G09, G17, G23, G27, G41, G43, G44, and G48a (P ≤ 0.001), indicating that these groups of genes, shared by the three plant species, may be involved in basic biological processes required for general plant growth and development. Some well-characterized genes of the AOP clade associated with common plant growth and development include ARABIDILLO1 and ARABIDILLO2 in group G12 and AtFBP7 in group G13 (Supplemental Table S2).

View this table:
Table III.

Overrepresentation or underrepresentation of ortholog clades in each phylogenetic group, as compared with the average distribution across all 1,654 F-box genes

P values were calculated using the cumulative Poisson distribution. The “Genes” columns represent the observed and expected (in parentheses) numbers of genes.

Homologs in Other Herbaceous Monocot, Herbaceous Eudicot, and Woody Eudicot Species

To test the validity of the hypotheses stated above, we investigated the homology of the F-box proteins in Arabidopsis, Populus, and Oryza with genes in other plants by BLAST search against transcript assemblies of 193 plant species (Childs et al., 2007; Supplemental Table S3). Among all herbaceous monocot, herbaceous eudicot, and woody eudicot EST data sets, the homologs of clade A or AP were significantly overrepresented in both sets of eudicots and underrepresented in herbaceous monocots; the homologs of clade O were overrepresented in the herbaceous monocot data set but underrepresented in all eudicots; the homologs of clade P were overrepresented in woody eudicots, including Vitis and Eucalyptus, and underrepresented in herbaceous monocots; and the homologs of clade AO were overrepresented in herbaceous eudicots but underrepresented in woody eudicots (Table IV ). These data clearly support the ortholog classification based on the phylogenetic tree and indicate that the majority of the genes in the species-specific clades (i.e. A, O, or P) share genomic/genic features with other monocots versus eudicots and/or herbaceous versus woody species.

View this table:
Table IV.

Overrepresentation or underrepresentation in herbaceous monocot, herbaceous eudicot, or woody eudicot species of homologs obtained by a tBLASTn search of the plant transcript assemblies (Childs et al., 2007; Supplemental Table S3) using the F-box proteins of clades A, O, P, AO, AP, or OP, as compared with the AOP clade, with an e-value cutoff of 1E−30

P value was calculated using the cumulative Poisson distribution.

Protein Motif Structure

InterProScan identified more than 90 types of protein motif structures in the 1,654 studied F-box proteins (Supplemental Table S4). Thirty-five percent of the F-box proteins (579 of 1,654) contained only a single motif (i.e. the F-box domain). Among the remaining 1,075 F-box proteins, 793 proteins (approximately 74%) contained one or more of the 10 most common protein motif structures (Fig. 3 ). Protein motif structure types 1, 5, and 6, containing F-box-associated domains, Leu-rich repeat 2 domains, and FBD domains, respectively, occurred more often than expected by chance alone in genes in the A clade (P ≤ 0.001). Protein motif structure types 2 and 9, containing Kelch-related and Leu-rich repeat domains, respectively, occurred more often than expected in genes in the AOP clade (P ≤ 0.001), indicating that these motifs may be associated with the basic biological processes shared by all three species.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

The 10 most common domain structures found in F-box proteins of Arabidopsis, Populus, and Oryza. The total number of genes associated with each domain structure is shown in parentheses.

Intron-Exon Structure

To contrast gene structures among the examined species, we compared the intron composition of the F-box genes by dividing gene structures into four bins: intronless, one intron, two introns, and three or more introns per gene. In general, the F-box genes in Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Populus contain more intronless genes and fewer three-or-more-intron genes than expected by chance alone when compared with all other genes in each examined genome (P ≤ 0.0001). Moreover, F-box genes in the A, P, and AP clades contain more intronless gene structures (P ≤ 0.001), and the AOP clade contains more genes with three or more introns (P ≤ 0.001), than expected by chance alone when compared with all other F-box genes (Table V ). Carmel et al. (2007) suggested that the loss of introns is associated with recent evolutionary expansion in large gene families. Our data support their conclusion and suggest that recent lineage-specific expansion of F-box gene family members has occurred among the three examined species.

View this table:
Table V.

Overrepresentation or underrepresentation of intron numbers per gene in each ortholog clade, as compared with all 1,654 F-box genes

P values were calculated using the cumulative Poisson distribution. The “Genes” columns represent the observed and expected (in parentheses) numbers of genes.

Gene Expression and Predicted Function

In Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Populus, 333 (51% of the total), 414 (61%), and 141 (44%), respectively, of the predicted F-box genes have expression evidence (i.e. ESTs and/or full-length cDNA data). Among the genes with expression evidence, the A, O, and P clades are significantly underrepresented and the AOP clade is overrepresented when compared with all genes (Fig. 2B), demonstrating that genes common to all three species are more frequently represented in such databases and genes uniquely found in Arabidopsis, Populus, or Oryza are less common in publicly available gene expression databases. This observation could be due to sampling error within the tested libraries or differences in the expression of recently evolved lineage-specific members of the F-box family, where lineage-specific genes may be infrequently expressed and as of yet uncatalogued.

In addition to the F-box-containing genes, there are several other genes associated with the SCF complex, including CAND1, COP9, Cul1, E1, E2, RBX1, ROC1, RUB1/2, and SKP1/ASK1/ASK2 (Lechner et al., 2006). A Spearman's rank correlation indicated that the 320 Populus F-box genes and 146 SCF-associated genes are expressed in a coordinated manner across nine different Populus tissue types (r = 0.97, P ≤ 0.0001; Fig. 4 ). Similarly, expression patterns for F-box and SCF complex-related genes in Arabidopsis in both the developmental and environmental data sets are correlated (r = 0.79, P ≤ 0.002). These data indicate that there is a transcriptional relationship between F-box genes and their associated protein complexes in Arabidopsis and Populus. In addition to the F-box members of the SCF complex, there are alternative members of the substrate-specific E3 ligase pathways, include HECT, RING, and U-box proteins. Both Arabidopsis and Populus have significantly more RING proteins than Oryza, and Oryza has more CUL3-BTB3 proteins than Arabidopsis and Populus (Table VI ), suggesting that the large differences in numbers of F-box genes in Arabidopsis versus Populus or Oryza versus Populus are not being compensated for by alternative ubiquitination pathways.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

The number of F-box and SCF complex-related genes expressed in Populus (A) and Arabidopsis (B) whole-genome microarray data. A Spearman's rank correlation with r = 0.97 and r = 0.79, respectively, indicates that F-box and SCF complex-related genes appear to be expressed in a similar pattern across the tissue types included in the analysis (P ≤ 0.01).

View this table:
Table VI.

Number of substrate-specific E3 ligase genes in Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Populus

A Gene Ontology (GO) analysis was performed to further characterize the predicted functions of the F-box proteins. Essential biological processes, including signal transduction, flower development, regulation of circadian rhythm, lateral root formation, and actin filament-based processes, occurred significantly more frequently in the AOP clade, whereas the genes associated with responses to biotic stresses were significantly enriched in the A clade (Table VII ), suggesting that (1) Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Populus share some essential biological pathways mediated by F-box proteins and (2) the lineage-specific expansion of F-box genes in Arabidopsis.

View this table:
Table VII.

GO term enrichment in F-box proteins

Vitis and Carica

A phylogenetic analysis was performed on the F-box genes in Populus, Vitis (Vitis vinifera), and Carica (Carica papaya; Supplemental Table S5; Supplemental Fig. S2). Based on the previously described HMMER search criteria, we identified 156 and 139 F-box genes in the newly sequenced Vitis (Jaillon et al., 2007) and Carica genomes, respectively. The Populus genome has experienced a whole-genome duplication event (Tuskan et al., 2006) that is not shared by Vitis or Carica; thus, the 320 F-box genes are in agreement with the detected F-box genes in Vitis and Carica. Interestingly, among the Populus F-box genes found in the AOP clade, 54% had no homologs in the Vitis and Carica genomes (Fig. 5 ). In contrast, among the Populus F-box genes found uniquely in the P clade, 75% had no homologs in the Vitis and Carica genomes. These data clearly show that even though Populus experienced a whole-genome duplication that was not shared by Vitis or Carica, there are significantly fewer F-box genes in all woody perennials compared with Arabidopsis and Oryza. These results support our hypothesis that woody perennial plants have fewer F-box genes relative to herbaceous annuals.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Comparison of F-box orthologs in Vitis-Carica-Populus within the Arabidopsis-Oryza-Populus context (note that groups with three or more Populus genes were excluded). The values in parentheses are numbers of Populus F-box genes. Under the Arabidopsis-Oryza-Populus context: AOP represents Populus F-box genes having orthologs in Arabidopsis and Oryza; AP represents Populus genes having orthologs in Arabidopsis only; OP represents Populus genes having orthologs in Oryza only; and P represents Populus genes having no orthologs in either Arabidopsis or Oryza. “No ortholog” represents Populus F-box genes having no orthologs in Vitis and Carica; “Two orthologs” represents two Populus genes co-orthologous to one or two genes in Vitis and/or Carica.

DISCUSSION

F-box proteins represent a large gene family in most eukaryotic organisms and appear to be underrepresented in Populus, Vitis, and Carica relative to Arabidopsis and Oryza. This study has explored (1) the extent of lineage/species-specific differential distribution of F-box genes among various subgroups within this gene family and (2) the functional implications of differential representation toward cellular and biological processes. For example, the genes involved in actin filament-based processes were found uniquely within the AOP clade. Alternatively, the up-regulated expression of 38 A clade self-incompatibility genes, mainly in pollen, points toward lineage-specific expansion that has played an important role in flower development and successful reproduction in Arabidopsis (Supplemental Table S6). Self-incompatibility genes were not found in the dioecious Populus (Yin et al., 2008).

In addition to the role that the F-box proteins play in mediating innate signals for developmental transition, another aspect for protein turnover may be related to rapid responses to external signals such as environmental cues and stressors. The presence of a much larger F-box gene family in plants (i.e. Arabidopsis, Oryza, Populus, Vitis, and Carica) when compared with less than 100 genes in animals (i.e. human, mouse, and Drosophila) suggests a predominant role for members of this gene family in the management of responses to environmental signals in immobile organisms.

Although Populus has half as many F-box genes as Arabidopsis, our results also confirm that certain F-box genes associated with developmental roles in organ boundary determination (e.g. HAWAIIAN SKIRT), floral organ development (e.g. UFO), and photoperiod and plant growth response signaling (e.g. vernalization-response [FKF1], circadian rhythm signaling [ZTL], phytochrome A-specific light signaling [EID1], ethylene perception [EBF1], GA signaling [SLEEPY1], and auxin signaling [TIR1]) have expanded in Populus relative to Oryza and Arabidopsis (Supplemental Fig. S3).

Yet another distinctive feature of the F-box gene family is the relatively high proportion of intronless genes. Carmel et al. (2007) suggested that high intron density was reached in the early evolutionary history of plants and that the last common ancestor of multicellular life forms harbored approximately 3.4 introns per kilobase, a greater intron density than in most of the extant fungi and in some animals. A recent report also implies that rates of intron creation were higher during earlier periods of plant evolution (Roy and Penny, 2007). Our results support these hypotheses in that the A, P, and AP clades are overrepresented by intronless gene structures and the AOP clade is overrepresented by genes with three or more introns. From this perspective, we conjecture that the F-box gene family members in Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Populus have experienced expansion since they last shared a common ancestor.

The SCF ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent pathway is one of the most elaborate and common protein-degradation systems. There are alternative pathways to ubiquitination in plants (Jin et al., 2005). The single-subunit ubiquitination complex, HECT, is twice as common in Populus, which argues against the link between reduced F-box gene number and the extent of ubiquitination, although the HECT pathway is thought to be used less frequently in most organisms. Members of the RING and APC complexes are nearly twice as abundant in Arabidopsis and Populus as they are in Oryza, and members of the CUL3-BTB3 complex are nearly twice as abundant in Oryza as they are in Arabidopsis and Populus, suggesting that dicots and monocots utilize these pathways in a differential manner.

The relatively fewer F-box genes in Populus must be integral to biological processes in Populus. In Arabidopsis, functional redundancy among members of this large gene family appears to account for some of the expansion. TIR1, AFB1, AFB2, and AFB3 quadruple mutants are reported to be viable (Dharmasiri et al., 2005). The smaller number of F-box genes in Populus suggests that in Populus, F-box proteins may have evolved to recognize multiple substrates (i.e. multifunctional/multiaffinity F-box proteins), contain fewer conserved pathways, and/or have alternative pathways that are functionally redundant. The recent expansion of the F-box gene family in Arabidopsis and Oryza compared with Populus, Vitis, and Carica may reflect a comparatively reduced need for ubiquitination-mediated protein turnover in long-lived perennial plants. However, because it is difficult to compare developmental stages between perennial and annual plants, we cannot conclusively determine the extent of the proteome that is ubiquitinated in Populus or Vitis relative to Arabidopsis or Oryza for any given ontogeny. Future proteomics investigations may shed light on the extent and prevalence of the ubiquitination pathway in Populus, and in particular on whether the SCF pathway is employed to a lesser extent in long-lived plants.

CONCLUSION

This study was undertaken to explore, through comparative bioinformatics, the qualitative and quantitative differences among the F-box genes present in three sequenced plant genomes. We further explored how the relative disparity of the F-box gene family in Populus may reflect the biology of this organism. Our results have shed light on several key differences in F-box gene family evolution between the three species, provided insights into the structure and composition of F-box gene family members in relation to distinguishing developmental and physiological features, and demonstrated that although the overall family size is smaller in Populus, certain subgroups containing genes with known roles in light response and plant growth signaling have expanded in Populus while those related to floral organ function have not. The modes of evolution of the gene families also varied among the examined species, where the F-box gene family appears to have predominantly expanded due to tandem duplication events in annual plants compared with the perennial Populus. Future studies employing proteomics and functional genomics approaches will be required to define the overall impact of gene family size, subgroup composition, and individual F-box genes on ubiquitination activity at the cellular level and the associated plant processes at the whole-organism level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gene Identification and Annotation

A HMM profile multiple sequence alignment of 510 protein sequences for the F-box domain (PF00646) was downloaded from Pfam. HMMER (Eddy, 1998) was used to search a customized database containing the genome annotations of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; TAIR release 7; http://www.arabidopsis.org/), Oryza (Oryza sativa; TIGR release 5; http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/), Populus (Populus trichocarpa; JGI release 1.1; http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Poptr1_1/Poptr1_1.home.html), Vitis (Vitis vinifera; http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/externe/GenomeBrowser/Vitis/; Jaillon et al., 2007), and Carica (Carica papaya; ftp://asgpb.mhpcc.hawaii.edu/papaya/annotation.genbank_submission/; Ming et al., 2008) for matches to the HMM profile with the threshold set at 1/100 of the Pfam GA gathering cutoff. The HMMER-selected proteins were then scanned for F-box domains using HMMPfam, HMMsmart, and ProfileScan implemented in InterPro (Mulder et al., 2007). The F-box-containing proteins identified by InterProScan were used for a BLASTp query (with an e-value cutoff of 1 × 10−20) of the original protein database used for the HMMER search. Finally, the BLASTp hits were scanned for F-box domains using HMMPfam, HMMsmart, and ProfileScan implemented in InterPro (Mulder et al., 2007).

Our HMMER-BLASTp-InterProScan strategy initially identified 656, 699, and 336 F-box-containing genes in the genomes of Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Populus, respectively. Of the 699 Oryza F-box genes, 21 were transposable elements according to TIGR annotation (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/), and they were excluded from the list of F-box proteins used for downstream analyses. Of the 336 Populus F-box genes, 17 genes were deleted because they appeared to represent gene duplicates found on small, unassembled scaffolds with no representation on the JGI Populus v1.1 VISTA browser (http://pipeline.lbl.gov/cgi-bin/gateway2?bg=ptr2filt&selector=vista) or because the gene model sequences were truncated by captured gaps. The 319 Populus F-box genes (represented by a Jamboree gene model in the JGI official release) were checked manually using the JGI Populus genome browser (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Poptr1_1/Poptr1_1.home.html) to determine whether or not an alternative gene model better represented each gene. The final gene model was chosen based on the criteria of full length (with start and stop codons), longer transcript/coding region, and, most importantly, higher homology with Arabidopsis proteins. As such, 120 Populus Jamboree-predicted gene models were replaced by 121 better alternative gene models. (Note that the genomic region of a predicted gene model, fgenesh4_pm.C_LG_VI000041, overlapped two alternative F-box genes in tandem and was consequently replaced by those models, eugene3.00060123 and eugene3.00060124.) Therefore, the final Populus F-box gene list contains 320 genes (Supplemental Table S1).

For other substrate-specific E3 ligase gene families, such as HECT, RING, U-box, CDC20, and BTB, the Arabidopsis genes documented by Mazzucotelli et al. (2006) were used as queries to search a customized database containing the genome annotations of Arabidopsis (TAIR release 7; http://www.arabidopsis.org/), Oryza (TIGR release 5; http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/), and Populus (JGI release 1.1; http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Poptr1_1/Poptr1_1.home.html) by BLASTp with an e-value cutoff of 1 × 10−20. The protein sequences of the BLASTp hits were scanned by InterPro (Mulder et al., 2007) for the signature protein domains: IPR000569 (HECT) for the HECT family, IPR001841 (zinc finger, RING type) or IPR013083 (zinc finger, RING/FYVE/PHD type) for the RING family, IPR003613 (U-box) for the U-box family, IPR000002 (Cdc20/Fizzy) for the CDC20 family, and IPR000210 (BTB/POZ-like), IPR013069 (BTB/POZ), or IPR011333 (BTB/POZ fold) for the BTB family.

Phylogenetic Tree Construction

Sequence alignments were performed with MAFFT (Katoh et al., 2005). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the relaxed neighbor-joining method (Evans et al., 2006). Bootstrap analysis was performed with SEQBOOT and CONSENSUS in the PHYLIP package (Felsenstein, 1989). The gene tree was reconciled with a species tree ([[Arabidopsis, Populus], Oryza] or [[Carica, Populus], Vitis]) using Notung (Chen et al., 2000) to estimate upper and lower bounds of the time of duplication. The tree was displayed using MEGA version 4.0 (Tamura et al., 2007). Orthologs, the genes originating from a single ancestral gene in the last common ancestor of the compared genomes (Koonin, 2005), were identified according to the reconciled phylogenetic trees.

Localization of F-Box Genes in the Genome

F-box gene distribution among chromosomes was evaluated by the observed number of F-box genes compared with their expected number under a Poisson distribution. The expected gene number λi on chromosome i would be a sample from a Poisson distribution, λi = mLi/∑Li, where, m is the total number of genes detected within the assembled sequences and Li is the length of chromosome i. The probabilities p(mi < λi) and p(mi > λi) were evaluated under the cumulative Poisson distribution at α ≤ 0.05 and α ≤ 0.01 significance levels.

Identification of Duplicated Genes

The identification of homologous chromosome segments in Populus resulting from whole-genome duplication events was described by Tuskan et al. (2006). Blocks of the same color represent the homologous chromosome segments. The information for Arabidopsis gene duplication was obtained from ftp://ftp.tigr.org/pub/data/a_thaliana/ath1/DATA_RELEASE_SUPPLEMENT/. The information for Oryza segmental duplication was obtained from http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/segmental_dup/100kb/segdup_100kb.shtml. The tandemly duplicated genes in Oryza were identified and defined as an array of two or more genes with Smith-Waterman alignment e-values ≤ 1 × 10−25 that were enclosed within a 100-kb window. The analysis of Populus tandem gene duplication, obtained from Tuskan et al. (2006), used the same criteria as for Oryza with added inclusion of maximum 4FTV = 1. Segmental duplications in Populus were identified by BLASTp as described for Oryza, but the expectation value was raised to e = 1e−25. Protein alignments of fewer than 50 amino acids were excluded. Segmentally duplicated pairs of Populus genes identified by BLASTp were verified as true paralogs using the VISTA browser (http://pipeline.lbl.gov/cgi-bin/gateway2?bg=ptr2filt&selector=vista) Populus duplicates track with default settings (minimum conserved region width = 100 bp; conservation identity = 70%) to confirm homology.

Homology Search in Other Plant Species

The 1,654 F-box protein sequences identified in Arabidopsis, Populus, and Oryza were used to query against transcript assemblies from 193 plant species (Childs et al., 2007) using tBLASTn with e-value cutoffs of 1e−10, 1e−20, 1e−30, 1e−40, 1e−50, 1e−60, 1e−70, and 1e−80 (Supplemental Table S7). Differences in the distribution of F-box genes among the ortholog clades (i.e. AOP, AO, OP, AP, A, O, and P) between the initial query F-box genes and the queries that have BLAST hits decreased with an increase of stringency in the e-value cutoff (from 1e−10 to 1e−80). This pattern in ortholog clade distribution was caused by a faster decrease in the percentage of the ortholog clades of F-box proteins in the species-specific clades (A, O, and P), suggesting that the phylogenetic signal was decaying more quickly in these clades (Supplemental Fig. S4). The ortholog clade distribution of the F-box proteins having BLAST hits became significantly (P ≤ 1e−7) different from the ortholog clade distribution of all of the query F-box proteins at an e-value cutoff of 1e−30. This e-value cutoff was used to investigate the distribution of BLAST hits (the F-box gene homologs) among herbaceous monocot, herbaceous eudicot, and woody eudicot samples derived from the transcript assemblies of more than 250 plant species (Childs et al., 2007).

Identification of Protein Motifs

Protein sequences were scanned for domains using BlastProDom, FPrintScan, HMMPIR, HMMPfam, HMMsmart, HMMTigr, ProfileScan, ScanRegExp, and SuperFamily implemented in InterPro (Mulder et al., 2007).

Intron Analysis

Intron information was obtained from the TAIR Arabidopsis annotation release 7 (http://www.arabidopsis.org/), TIGR Oryza annotation release 5 (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/), and JGI Populus annotation release 1.1 (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Poptr1_1/Poptr1_1.home.html).

Expression Evidence of F-Box Genes

Expression evidence from ESTs or full-length cDNAs for Arabidopsis genes was obtained from TAIR release 7 (http://www.arabidopsis.org/). Expression evidence from ESTs or full-length cDNAs for Oryza genes was obtained from TIGR release 5 (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/). Expression evidence from ESTs or full-length cDNAs for Populus genes was determined by a minimum of 97% identity over an alignment of at least 100 bp and at least 80% length of the shorter sequences.

Analysis of Gene Expression

Two Arabidopsis microarray data sets were compiled from AtGenExpress (Schmid et al., 2005; Kilian et al., 2007). The developmental data set is represented by the following organs/tissues: cotyledons, hypocotyls, roots, shoot apices, rosette leaves, senescing leaves, second internodes, flowers, sepals, petals, stamens, carpels, siliques, and seeds. The gene expression levels are expressed as LOG2(x/y), where x is the detection signal from the above tissue types and y is the detection signal from seedlings. The environmental data set is represented by the following treatments: cold, salt, drought, oxidative, UV-B light, heat, pathogen stresses, and blue light, far-red light, red light, and white light environments. Dark treatment was used as a control for the light experiments. See Kilian et al. (2007) and Schmid et al. (2005) for further details. K-means clustering of the Arabidopsis microarray data was performed using EPCLUST (http://ep.ebi.ac.uk/EP/EPCLUST/) with correlation distance (uncentered).

Coexpression of F-Box-Related Genes

In addition to the F-box genes, there are also several other F-box-related genes involved in the SCF complex, including CAND1, COP9, Cul1, E1, E2, RBX1, ROC1, RUB1/2, and SKP1/ASK1/ASK2 (Lechner et al., 2006). In order to compare F-box-related gene expression across 12 Populus tissues with the expression of the 320 F-box genes (Gene Expression Omnibus Database under accession nos GSM146141 to GSM146299; series GSE6422; platform GPL2618), a Spearman's rank correlation was performed. F-box-related genes in Arabidopsis were first identified by querying the gene names in the TAIR database (Rhee et al., 2003), and subsequent sequence information was used to perform a BLASTp analysis on the JGI Populus v1.1 browser (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Poptr1_1/Poptr1_1.home.html). This resulted in a list of 146 Populus F-box-related genes, the names of which were used to query NimbleGen whole-genome microarray data from 12 different Populus tissues. Those genes expressed significantly above background (Q ≤ 0.05) were said to be expressed in a particular tissue. Microarray data from the 320 F-box genes and F-box-related genes were then compared to see if the number of genes expressed in each tissue occurred in a similar pattern across the 12 tissues. A Spearman's rank correlation was calculated.

GO Analysis

GO annotation of the F-box proteins was performed using BLAST2GO, with parameters optimized for the annotation of Arabidopsis sequences (National Center for Biotechnology Information nonredundant database; 20 hits maximum and 33 amino acid minimum high scoring pair length; e-value hit filter of 1e−06; annotation cutoff value of 55; GO weight of 5; Conesa et al., 2005). GO enrichment analysis was performed using FatiGO+ (Al-Shahrour et al., 2007).

Supplemental Data

The following materials are available in the online version of this article.

  • Supplemental Figure S1. Phylogenetic tree of the F-box genes in Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Populus.

  • Supplemental Figure S2. Phylogenetic tree of the F-box genes in Carica, Populus, and Vitis.

  • Supplemental Figure S3. Ortholog clades of well-characterized Arabidopsis genes.

  • Supplemental Figure S4. The percentage of the ortholog clades of F-box proteins in Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Populus showing homology to other plant species.

  • Supplemental Table S1. F-box genes in Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Populus.

  • Supplemental Table S2. Well-characterized Arabidopsis F-box genes.

  • Supplemental Table S3. The herbaceous monocot, herbaceous eudicot, and woody eudicot species.

  • Supplemental Table S4. Domain structure of the F-box proteins in Arabidopsis, Populus, and Oryza.

  • Supplemental Table S5. F-box genes in Carica and Vitis.

  • Supplemental Table S6. Arabidopsis S-locus F-box genes by phylogenetic group and orthologous clade.

  • Supplemental Table S7. Number of F-box proteins in Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Populus showing homology to other plant species.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mark Schuster for technical assistance. We thank Stan Wullschleger and Nancy Engle for comments on the manuscript. We also thank Matias Kirst, Chris Dervinis, Amy Brunner, and Andrew Groover for allowing us to use their microarray data.

Footnotes

  • The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Gerald A. Tuskan (tuskanga{at}ornl.gov).

  • www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.108.121921

  • ↵1 This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological, and Environmental Research Carbon Sequestration Program. Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract Number DE–AC05–00OR22725.

  • ↵[OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.

  • ↵[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.

  • Received April 28, 2008.
  • Accepted August 24, 2008.
  • Published September 5, 2008.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    Al-Shahrour F, Minguez P, Tarraga J, Medina I, Alloza E, Montaner D, Dopazo J (2007) FatiGO+: a functional profiling tool for genomic data. Integration of functional annotation, regulatory motifs and interaction data with microarray experiments. Nucleic Acids Res 35: W91–W96
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Badescu GO, Napier RM (2006) Receptors for auxin: will it all end in TIRs? Trends Plant Sci 11: 217–223
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Binder BM, Walker JM, Gagne JM, Emborg TJ, Hemmann G, Bleecker AB, Vierstra RD (2007) The Arabidopsis EIN3 binding F-box proteins EBF1 and EBF2 have distinct but overlapping roles in ethylene signaling. Plant Cell 19: 509–523
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Calderon-Villalobos LI, Nill C, Marrocco K, Kretsch T, Schwechheimer C (2007) The evolutionarily conserved Arabidopsis thaliana F-box protein AtFBP7 is required for efficient translation during temperature stress. Gene 392: 106–116
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Carmel L, Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Koonin EV (2007) Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes. Genome Res 17: 1034–1044
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Chang EC, Schwechheimer C (2004) ZOMES III: the interface between signalling and proteolysis. Meeting on the COP9 signalosome, proteasome and eIF3. EMBO Rep 5: 1041–1045
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Chen K, Durand D, Farach-Colton M (2000) NOTUNG: a program for dating gene duplications and optimizing gene family trees. J Comput Biol 7: 429–447
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Childs KL, Hamilton JP, Zhu W, Ly E, Cheung F, Wu H, Rabinowicz PD, Town CD, Buell CR, Chan AP (2007) The TIGR plant transcript assemblies database. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D846–851
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Conesa A, Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Talon M, Robles M (2005) Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21: 3674–3676
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Dharmasiri N, Dharmasiri S, Estelle M (2005) The F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 435: 441–445
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Dieterle M, Zhou YC, Schafer E, Funk M, Kretsch T (2001) EID1, an F-box protein involved in phytochrome A-specific light signaling. Genes Dev 15: 939–944
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Dill A, Thomas SG, Hu J, Steber CM, Sun TP (2004) The Arabidopsis F-box protein SLEEPY1 targets gibberellin signaling repressors for gibberellin-induced degradation. Plant Cell 16: 1392–1405
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Durfee T, Roe JL, Sessions RA, Inouye C, Serikawa K, Feldmann KA, Weigel D, Zambryski PC (2003) The F-box-containing protein UFO and AGAMOUS participate in antagonistic pathways governing early petal development in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 8571–8576
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Eddy SR (1998) Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 14: 755–763
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Evans J, Sheneman L, Foster J (2006) Relaxed neighbor joining: a fast distance-based phylogenetic tree construction method. J Mol Evol 62: 785–792
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP: Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics 5: 164–166
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    Haas BJ, Delcher AL, Mount SM, Wortman JR, Smith RK Jr, Hannick LI, Maiti R, Ronning CM, Rusch DB, Town CD, et al (2003) Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 5654–5666
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Han L, Mason M, Risseeuw EP, Crosby WL, Somers DE (2004) Formation of an SCF(ZTL) complex is required for proper regulation of circadian timing. Plant J 40: 291–301
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Imaizumi T, Schultz TF, Harmon FG, Ho LA, Kay SA (2005) FKF1 F-box protein mediates cyclic degradation of a repressor of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Science 309: 293–297
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Jaillon O, Aury JM, Noel B, Policriti A, Clepet C, Casagrande A, Choisne N, Aubourg S, Vitulo N, Jubin C, et al (2007) The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 449: 463–467
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Jin J, Ang XL, Shirogane T, Wade Harper JW (2005) Identification of substrates for F-box proteins. Methods Enzymol 399: 287–309
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP, Bartel B (2006) MicroRNAS and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57: 19–53
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T (2005) MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 511–518
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Kevei E, Gyula P, Hall A, Kozma-Bognar L, Kim WY, Eriksson ME, Toth R, Hanano S, Feher B, Southern MM, et al (2006) Forward genetic analysis of the circadian clock separates the multiple functions of ZEITLUPE. Plant Physiol 140: 933–945
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Kilian J, Whitehead D, Horak J, Wanke D, Weinl S, Batistic O, D'Angelo C, Bornberg-Bauer E, Kudla J, Harter K (2007) The AtGenExpress global stress expression data set: protocols, evaluation and model data analysis of UV-B light, drought and cold stress responses. Plant J 50: 347–363
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Kim HS, Delaney TP (2002) Arabidopsis SON1 is an F-box protein that regulates a novel induced defense response independent of both salicylic acid and systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 14: 1469–1482
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Kipreos ET, Pagano M (2000) The F-box protein family. Genome Biol 1: REVIEWS3002
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    Koonin EV (2005) Orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics. Annu Rev Genet 39: 309–338
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Lai CP, Lee CL, Chen PH, Wu SH, Yang CC, Shaw JF (2004) Molecular analyses of the Arabidopsis TUBBY-like protein gene family. Plant Physiol 134: 1586–1597
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Lechner E, Achard P, Vansiri A, Potuschak T, Genschik P (2006) F-box proteins everywhere. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9: 631–638
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Mazzucotelli E, Belloni S, Marone D, De Leonardis AM, Guerra D, Fonzo N, Cattivelli L, Mastrangelo AM (2006) The E3 ubiquitin ligase gene family in plants: regulation by degradation. Curr Genomics 7: 509–522
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Ming R, Hou S, Feng Y, Yu Q, Dionne-Laporte A, Saw JH, Senin P, Wang W, Ly BV, Lewis KL, et al (2008) The draft genome of the transgenic tropical fruit tree papaya (Carica papaya Linnaeus). Nature 452: 991–996
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Mulder NJ, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Binns D, Bork P, Buillard V, Cerutti L, Copley R, et al (2007) New developments in the InterPro database. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D224–228
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Ouyang S, Zhu W, Hamilton J, Lin H, Campbell M, Childs K, Thibaud-Nissen F, Malek RL, Lee Y, Zheng L, et al (2007) The TIGR rice genome annotation resource: improvements and new features. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D883–D887
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Qiao H, Wang F, Zhao L, Zhou J, Lai Z, Zhang Y, Robbins TP, Xue Y (2004) The F-box protein AhSLF-S2 controls the pollen function of S-RNase-based self-incompatibility. Plant Cell 16: 2307–2322
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Rhee SY, Beavis W, Berardini TZ, Chen GH, Dixon D, Doyle A, Garcia-Hernandez M, Huala E, Lander G, Montoya M, et al (2003) The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): a model organism database providing a centralized, curated gateway to Arabidopsis biology, research materials and community. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 224–228
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Roy SW, Penny D (2007) Patterns of intron loss and gain in plants: intron loss-dominated evolution and genome-wide comparison of O. sativa and A. thaliana. Mol Biol Evol 24: 171–181
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Schmid M, Davison TS, Henz SR, Pape UJ, Demar M, Vingron M, Scholkopf B, Weigel D, Lohmann JU (2005) A gene expression map of Arabidopsis thaliana development. Nat Genet 37: 501–506
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Sijacic P, Wang X, Skirpan AL, Wang Y, Dowd PE, McCubbin AG, Huang S, Kao TH (2004) Identification of the pollen determinant of S-RNase-mediated self-incompatibility. Nature 429: 302–305
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Stirnberg P, Furner IJ, Ottoline Leyser HM (2007) MAX2 participates in an SCF complex which acts locally at the node to suppress shoot branching. Plant J 50: 80–94
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Takayama S, Isogai A (2005) Self-incompatibility in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56: 467–489
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1596–1599
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Tuskan GA, DiFazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, Hellsten U, Putnam N, Ralph S, Rombauts S, Salamov A, et al (2006) The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313: 1596–1604
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Wang L, Dong L, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Wu W, Deng X, Xue Y (2004) Genome-wide analysis of S-locus F-box-like genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol 56: 929–945
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Woo HR, Chung KM, Park JH, Oh SA, Ahn T, Hong SH, Jang SK, Nam HG (2001) ORE9, an F-box protein that regulates leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13: 1779–1790
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    Yin T, DiFazio SP, Gunter LE, Zhang X, Sewell MM, Woolbright SA, Allan GJ, Kelleher CT, Douglas CJ, Wang M, et al (2008) Genome structure and emerging evidence of an incipient sex chromosome in Populus. Genome Res 18: 422–430
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Request Permissions
The F-Box Gene Family Is Expanded in Herbaceous Annual Plants Relative to Woody Perennial Plants
Xiaohan Yang, Udaya C. Kalluri, Sara Jawdy, Lee E. Gunter, Tongming Yin, Timothy J. Tschaplinski, David J. Weston, Priya Ranjan, Gerald A. Tuskan
Plant Physiology Nov 2008, 148 (3) 1189-1200; DOI: 10.1104/pp.108.121921
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

In this issue

View this article with LENS