Skip to main content

Main menu

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleFUTURE PERSPECTIVES IN PLANT BIOLOGY
You have accessRestricted Access

Evolution of C4 Photosynthesis—Looking for the Master Switch

Peter Westhoff, Udo Gowik
Peter Westhoff
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: west@uni-duesseldorf.de
Udo Gowik
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published October 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.161729

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2010 American Society of Plant Biologists

C4 PHOTOSYNTHESIS—THE BASICS

C4 photosynthesis is a unique blend of biochemical, anatomical, and gene regulatory characteristics. In the vast majority of C4 plants, i.e. with the exception of single-cell C4 photosynthesis in the Chenopodiaceae, this photosynthetic pathway is the result of the integrated metabolic activities of two distinct, specialized leaf cell types, mesophyll and bundle sheath cells. CO2 is initially fixed in the mesophyll cells by phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase. The resulting C4 acids diffuse into the bundle sheath cells, where CO2 is liberated by one or several of the decarboxylases NADP-malic enzyme, NAD-malic enzyme, or phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, and channeled into the Calvin-Benson cycle. C4 photosynthesis is therefore essentially a pump that concentrates CO2 at the site of Rubisco in the bundle sheath cells (Kanai and Edwards, 1999). The division of labor between mesophyll and bundle sheath cells involves the compartmentation of enzymes and metabolite transporters of the photosynthetic carbon assimilation pathway, but also of the photosynthetic electron transport complexes and other metabolic pathways. It relies on the differential expression of the corresponding genes (Hibberd and Covshoff, 2010).

As a consequence of the CO2-concentrating mechanism Rubisco becomes saturated with CO2, photorespiration is largely reduced, and Rubisco can achieve its maximal catalytic activity. In addition, C4 plants use water and nitrogen more efficiently than C3 species (Ehleringer and Monson, 1993). Not surprisingly, C4 plants contribute about 25% of total terrestrial photosynthesis, although they account for only 3% of the vascular plants. Entire ecosystems like the warm-climate grasslands or savannas are dominated and shaped by C4 plants of the grass family. The emergence of C4 grasses in the late Miocene and Pleistocene, i.e. 3 to 8 million years ago, and the concomitant displacement of C3 grasses demonstrates the adaptational advantage of the C4 photosynthetic pathway (Edwards et al., 2010).

THE C4 SYNDROME—KRANZ ANATOMY AND VEIN SPACING

Although leaf architecture may vary considerably in the various mono- and dicotyledonous C4 lineages, a wreath-like structure of mesophyll and bundle sheath cells around the vascular bundles (Kranz anatomy) is typical for all C4 plants. Mesophyll cells are always located toward the outer face of the leaf and thus in contact with the intercellular air space, while bundle sheath cells are arranged internally to the mesophyll cells and hence close to the vascular tissues. Mesophyll and bundle sheath cells of C4 species are intimately connected to each other due to the high densities of plasmodesmata (Dengler and Nelson, 1999).

Kranz anatomy is accompanied by a dense vein spacing. The high vein density results in a reduced volume of mesophyll relative to bundle sheath tissue that in C4 grasses may reach a ratio of nearly one to one. The close vein spacing in C4 species appears to be mostly due to changes in the patterning of the minor and not the major veins (Ueno et al., 2006).

C4 PHOTOSYNTHESIS IS OF POLYPHYLETIC ORIGIN AND A QUANTITATIVE TRAIT

C4 photosynthesis is found only in higher plants, but originated more than 40 times independently during angiosperm evolution. Most of the C4 species occur in the grasses (approximately 4,600) and sedges (approximately 1,600), whereas only about 1,600 C4 dicots species are known. They are spread over 15 families. C4 grasses probably evolved in the early Oligocene about 30 million years ago, while C4 dicots appeared later, less than 20 million years ago (Sage, 2004).

The polyphyletic origin of C4 photosynthesis indicates that only relatively small evolutionary changes were required for the establishment of this photosynthetic pathway. Studies with genera containing C3, C4, and C3-C4 intermediate species, e.g. Flaveria, allowed insights into the evolutionary trajectories (Sage, 2004). C4 evolution started with genomes that had acquired redundant genes due to duplications of whole genomes, genome segments, or single genes (Monson, 2003). An increase in vein density and an enhancement and activation of the bundle sheath cell layer resulted in a rudimentary Kranz anatomy. The compartmentation of Gly decarboxylase in the bundle sheath cells was the next step and led to a photorespiratory CO2 pump. An elevated phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase activity and subsequently an increase in the other C4 cycle enzymes and transporters accompanied by their compartmentalized expression established the C4 cycle between mesophyll and bundle sheath cells.

The stepwise transition from C3 to C4 and the occurrence of C3-C4 intermediate species in today’s flora suggests that each of the steps provided an adaptive advantage. Genetically the C4 syndrome may therefore be best described as a polygenic, quantitative trait. The concept of C4 photosynthesis as being a quantitative trait immediately implies a number of questions that will structure the course of future studies into the biology of this physiological and anatomical syndrome.

What is the genetic architecture of C4 photosynthesis, i.e. how many genes are required to establish this phenotypic syndrome? Are the genes organized into functional units giving rise to distinct subphenotypes? Do these functional units form gene regulatory networks whose component genes are regulated coordinately and hence may be viewed as separate regulatory modules?

THE GENETIC ARCHITECTURE OF C4 PHOTOSYNTHESIS

Searching for a Genetically Tractable Model System

Genetic approaches using model systems are the silver bullet to dissect biological traits into its component genes and understand their functions. Model systems are easily genetically accessible, have short generation times, and a small stature. They can be efficiently and robustly transformed and have a small genome.

Maize (Zea mays) and—less so—sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) have been and are still used extensively for C4 research. Their genomes are known, and at least maize can be transformed with reasonable efficiency. Maize and sorghum are large plants with relatively long generation times that make large-scale mutagenesis experiments a logistical challenge. The genome of maize is large and quasitetraploid, which adds to the difficulties in using this plant as a C4 model species.

The Asteracean genus Flaveria has become a model system for studying the evolutionary trajectories taken from C3 to C4 photosynthesis. The genus is ideally suited for this purpose, because it contains large numbers of C3, C3-C4, and C4 species. A C4 species, Flaveria bidentis, is transformable, although with only moderate to low efficiency. A genome sequence is lacking, and it has not been explored whether F. bidentis is suited for forward and reverse genetic approaches.

Because of its phylogenetic relationship with Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) the genus Cleome was proposed as a C4 model system (Brown et al., 2005). Cleome includes both C4 and C3 species that grow and flower under greenhouse conditions with short generation times. The C4 species Cleome gynandra can be transformed (Newell et al., 2010); however, as in Flaveria, its genetics is not developed.

The small C4 grass Setaria viridis, the wild progenitor of foxtail millet (Setaria italica), has been discussed as a model system for bioenergy research (Doust et al., 2009). The Setaria genome is small and currently being sequenced. S. viridis plants are of small stature and self-compatible. They have a short life cycle, and genetic resources are already available. Thus S. viridis could be a perfect genetic model for C4 research; however, a robust and efficient transformation procedure is not yet available.

Mapping of C4 Quantitative Trait Loci

The notion of C4 photosynthesis as a quantitative trait suggests that a quantitative trait loci mapping strategy could be pursued to decipher the C4 genetic framework. Such an approach requires closely related C3 and C4 species that can be crossed to give fertile F1 offspring from which F2 populations segregating for C4 traits can be constructed.

Hybridizations between closely related C3 and C4 species were started in the early 1970s. F2 populations were constructed from F1 hybrids between Atriplex hastata (C3) and Atriplex rosea (C4) and shown to segregate for individual C4 traits. However, the F2 plants were aneuploid and further crosses were therefore not feasible. Within the genus Flaveria crosses between C3 and C3-C4 species were achieved, but crosses between C3 and C4 Flaveria species failed (Brown and Bouton, 1993).

Since segregating populations between C3 and C4 Atriplex species are feasible and the development and application of molecular marker technology and high-throughput genome sequencing in nonmodel species is no longer a hindering factor, the hybridization experiments with Atriplex should be revitalized.

The grasses do not contain closely related C3 and C4 species with the exception of the Panicoid grass Alloteropsis semialata that is divided into two subspecies with C3 (subsp. eckloniana) and C4 photosynthesis (subsp. semialata). However, the subspecies differ in ploidy levels (Ueno and Sentoku, 2006), which interferes with hybrid formation.

Evolutionary Studies

The evolutionary transition from C3 to C4 photosynthesis involved massive quantitative and qualitative changes in gene expression. A comprehensive and comparative analysis of gene expression in closely related C3 and C4 species, e.g. Flaveria, Cleome, and Atriplex, should therefore allow identifying the C4 gene repertoire (Bräutigam et al., 2010). Closely related species have to be compared to minimize that the observed expression differences are due to the phylogenetic distance rather than to the presence or absence of C4 photosynthesis. In nonmodel organisms, transcriptome analysis by using next-generation sequencing technologies is the method of choice and may also lay the foundation for proteome approaches.

We believe that Flaveria is the genus of choice in which such a comparative transcriptome analysis should be performed. The genus contains the largest number of C3-C4 intermediate species reported so far in any genus. All the physiological, biochemical, and anatomical characteristics relevant to C4 evolution have been investigated and the data are documented in quantitative formats (compare with McKown and Dengler, 2007). A statistical comparison of transcriptome and phenotypic data should allow detecting correlations between genes and C4 traits.

Using C3 Model Plants for Identifying Genetic Determinants for Kranz Anatomy

Anatomical and molecular biological studies indicate that C3 plants possess already a blueprint for a basic Kranz anatomy (compare with Engelmann et al., 2008). Many C3 angiosperms, like Arabidopsis, have a parenchymateous and even chlorenchymateous bundle sheath. However, in contrast to C4 species this bundle sheath is typically not well pronounced and it contains much less and smaller chloroplasts than in C4 plants (Leegood, 2008).

This finding opens up the possibility to search for Kranz anatomy genes in C3 model species and take advantage of the rich genetic and molecular resources that are available for these species. Understanding the formation of bundle sheath cells and of veins in these C3 species would allow to propose functional models that could be tested in C4 species.

GENE REGULATION IN C4 PHOTOSYNTHESIS

A Case for Gene Regulatory Networks

The evolution of C4 photosynthesis required massive quantitative and spatial changes in gene expression (Bräutigam et al., 2010). It is believed that most of these changes were achieved by transcriptional regulation. However, posttranscriptional control of gene expression in C4 photosynthesis is well documented, and the role of this regulatory level in C4 gene expression may be underestimated (Hibberd and Covshoff, 2010).

How can one reconcile the polyphyletic origin of C4 photosynthesis and the massive changes in gene expression that accompanied each C3-to-C4 transition? All available evidence indicates that preexisting gene regulatory networks in C3 angiosperms were decisive preadaptations that paved the way toward multiple C4 evolution. Promoters driving mesophyll or bundle sheath specific gene expression in C4 species partly maintain their cell preference of expression in closely or even widely related C3 species (Matsuoka et al., 1994; Engelmann et al., 2008). This suggests that the gene regulatory networks controlling the development and differentiation of mesophyll and bundle sheath cells of C4 plants are not fundamentally different from those of C3 species. In addition, gene regulatory networks exist in C3 plants that assure a coordinated response of genes involved in photosynthesis and related metabolic pathways (Mentzen and Wurtele, 2008). As a consequence, networks for regulating both developmental and metabolic processes operated already in C3 ancestral angiosperms.

The concept of a gene regulatory network implies that cascades of genes encoding transcription factors and their corresponding cis-regulatory elements are interlinked with each other, receive input from signaling genes, and control the expression of effector gene batteries via combinations of these cis-regulatory elements. The architecture of gene regulatory networks in development is hierarchical. They consist of kernels operating in the initial stages of development and peripheral subcircuits that control terminal cell differentiation and function. While the kernels are generally relatively stable, the peripheral subcircuits are evolutionarily more labile. Depending where a mutational change occurs in the hierarchy of a gene regulatory network the effects are more or less drastic (Erwin and Davidson, 2009).

Unfortunately, our knowledge on the molecular nature of C4-specific cis- and trans-regulatory factors is poor. We also have only a rather rudimentary understanding of which gene regulatory networks are involved in determining the development and anatomy of a typical leaf of a C3 angiosperm.

cis-Regulatory Elements

Only one cis-regulatory element for cell-specific leaf parenchyma gene expression has been described so far at the level of nucleotide resolution. The identified module consists of 41 bp and determines the mesophyll specificity of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase gene expression in C4 Flaveria species. The evolutionary origin of this module is known. Only small evolutionary changes were found to be required to transform its C3 ancestral form into a mesophyll expression module (Akyildiz et al., 2007), which reinforces the evolutionary easiness of C3-to-C4 transitions. In Arabidopsis and rice (Oryza sativa) quite large numbers of enhancer trap lines have been described and also screened for leaf-specific expression patterns (Springer, 2000). However, no enhancers specific for mesophyll or bundle sheath cells have been molecularly identified yet. Our knowledge about cis-regulatory elements involved in leaf parenchyma-specific gene expression remains therefore unsatisfactory.

trans-Regulatory Factors

Knowledge about trans-regulatory components operating in gene regulatory network that specify leaf anatomy or regulate parenchyma-specific gene expression is similarly fragmentary. The kernel of the gene regulatory system controlling adaxial-abaxial leaf polarity, i.e. the transcription factors of the class III homeodomain zipper and KANADI proteins, has been identified (Braybrook and Kuhlemeier, 2010). However, we have no information about the subcircuits that regulate differentiation of mesophyll and bundle sheath cells and their transcriptional networks. The GOLDEN2-LIKE (GLK) transcription factors GLK1 and GLK2 are the only exception. In Arabidopsis the GLK proteins are largely redundant and control the expression of more than 100 genes the majority of which is functionally connected with photosynthesis. In the C4 species maize, however, the two GLK genes are differentially expressed with GOLDEN2 specifically affecting only chloroplast development in the bundle sheath cells (Waters and Langdale, 2009). GLK proteins appear to have been recruited to a gene regulatory network of mesophyll/bundle sheath differentiation during maize evolution.

OUTLOOK

The world of the 21st century will face massive problems in supplying the food that is needed to nourish the growing human population and to fulfill the change in diet toward more meat consumption. Green energy from plant biomass is expected to solve at least partly our energy demands. The challenge will be to increase crop production drastically both in terms of harvestable yield and total biomass, but in a sustainable manner. C4 plants with their high photosynthetic capacity and their efficient use of nitrogen and water resources have received an increasing interest in recent years, and attempts are under way in even transferring this type of photosynthesis into current C3 crops (Sheehy et al., 2007). For embarking on this endeavor in synthetic biology we need to know the genetic architecture of C4 photosynthesis and the underlying gene regulatory networks. Understanding the evolutionary trajectories of C4 photosynthesis is a prerequisite for this exercise in synthetic experimental evolution (Erwin and Davidson, 2009).

Acknowledgments

We apologize to all those whose work could not be cited due to space constraints.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the Comprehensive Research Center SFB590, the Research Group FOR1186, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

  • www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.110.161729

  • Received June 25, 2010.
  • Accepted July 3, 2010.
  • Published October 6, 2010.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Akyildiz M,
    2. Gowik U,
    3. Engelmann S,
    4. Koczor M,
    5. Streubel M,
    6. Westhoff P
    (2007) Evolution and function of a cis-regulatory module for mesophyll-specific gene expression in the C4 dicot Flaveria trinervia. Plant Cell 19: 3391–3402
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Bräutigam A,
    2. Kajala K,
    3. Wullenweber J,
    4. Sommer M,
    5. Gagneul D,
    6. Weber KL,
    7. Carr KM,
    8. Gowik U,
    9. Maß J,
    10. Lercher MJ,
    11. et al.
    (2010) An mRNA blueprint for C4 photosynthesis derived from comparative transcriptomics of closely related C3 and C4 species. Plant Physiol (in press)
  3. ↵
    1. Braybrook SA,
    2. Kuhlemeier C
    (2010) How a plant builds leaves. Plant Cell 22: 1006–1018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Brown NJ,
    2. Parsley K,
    3. Hibberd JM
    (2005) The futured C-4 research—maize, Flaveria or Cleome? Trends Plant Sci 10: 215–221
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Brown RH,
    2. Bouton JH
    (1993) Physiology and genetics of interspecific hybrids between photosynthetic types. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 44: 435–456
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Sage RF,
    2. Monson RK
    1. Dengler NG,
    2. Nelson T
    (1999) Leaf structure and development in C4 plants. In Sage RF, Monson RK, eds, C4 Plant Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 133–172
  7. ↵
    1. Doust AN,
    2. Kellogg EA,
    3. Devos KM,
    4. Bennetzen JL
    (2009) Foxtail millet: a sequence-driven grass model system. Plant Physiol 149: 137–141
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Edwards EJ,
    2. Osborne CP,
    3. Strömberg CA,
    4. Smith SA,
    5. Bond WJ,
    6. Christin PA,
    7. Cousins AB,
    8. Duvall MR,
    9. Fox DL,
    10. Freckleton RP,
    11. et al.
    (2010) The origins of C4 grasslands: integrating evolutionary and ecosystem science. Science 328: 587–591
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Ehleringer JR,
    2. Monson RK
    (1993) Evolutionary and ecological aspects of photosynthetic pathway variation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24: 411–439
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Engelmann S,
    2. Wiludda C,
    3. Burscheidt J,
    4. Gowik U,
    5. Schlue U,
    6. Koczor M,
    7. Streubel M,
    8. Cossu R,
    9. Bauwe H,
    10. Westhoff P
    (2008) The gene for the P-subunit of glycine decarboxylase from the C4 species Flaveria trinervia: analysis of transcriptional control in transgenic Flaveria bidentis (C4) and Arabidopsis (C3). Plant Physiol 146: 1773–1785
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Erwin DH,
    2. Davidson EH
    (2009) The evolution of hierarchical gene regulatory networks. Nat Rev Genet 10: 141–148
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Hibberd JM,
    2. Covshoff S
    (2010) The regulation of gene expression required for C4 photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61: 181–207
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Sage RF,
    2. Monson RK
    1. Kanai R,
    2. Edwards GE
    (1999) The biochemistry of C4 photosynthesis. In Sage RF, Monson RK, eds, C4 Plant Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 49–87
  14. ↵
    1. Leegood RC
    (2008) Roles of the bundle sheath cells in leaves of C3 plants. J Exp Bot 59: 1663–1673
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Matsuoka M,
    2. Kyozuka J,
    3. Shimamoto K,
    4. Kano-Murakami Y
    (1994) The promoters of two carboxylases in a C4 plant (maize) direct cell-specific, light-regulated expression in a C3 plant (rice). Plant J 6: 311–319
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. McKown AD,
    2. Dengler NG
    (2007) Key innovations in the evolution of kranz anatomy and C4 vein pattern in Flaveria (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 94: 382–399
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Mentzen WI,
    2. Wurtele ES
    (2008) Regulon organization of Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol 8: 99
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Monson RK
    (2003) Gene duplication, neofunctionalization, and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Int J Plant Sci (Suppl) 164: S43–S54
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Newell CA,
    2. Brown NJ,
    3. Liu Z,
    4. Pflug A,
    5. Gowik U,
    6. Westhoff P,
    7. Hibberd JM
    (2010) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Cleome gynandra L., a C(4) dicotyledon that is closely related to Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot 61: 1311–1319
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Sage RF
    (2004) The evolution of C4 photosynthesis. New Phytol 161: 341–370
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Sheehy JE,
    2. Mitchell PL,
    3. Hardy B
    (2007) Charting New Pathways to C4 Rice. World Scientific, Singapore
  22. ↵
    1. Springer PS
    (2000) Gene traps: tools for plant development and genomics. Plant Cell 12: 1007–1020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Ueno O,
    2. Kawano Y,
    3. Wakayama M,
    4. Takeda T
    (2006) Leaf vascular systems in C3 and C4 grasses: a two-dimensional analysis. Ann Bot (Lond) 97: 611–621
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Ueno O,
    2. Sentoku N
    (2006) Comparison of leaf structure and photosynthetic characteristics off C3 and C4 Alloteropsis semialata subspecies. Plant Cell Environ 29: 257–268
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Waters MT,
    2. Langdale JA
    (2009) The making of a chloroplast. EMBO J 28: 2861–2873
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Physiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evolution of C4 Photosynthesis—Looking for the Master Switch
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Physiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Physiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Evolution of C4 Photosynthesis—Looking for the Master Switch
Peter Westhoff, Udo Gowik
Plant Physiology Oct 2010, 154 (2) 598-601; DOI: 10.1104/pp.110.161729

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Evolution of C4 Photosynthesis—Looking for the Master Switch
Peter Westhoff, Udo Gowik
Plant Physiology Oct 2010, 154 (2) 598-601; DOI: 10.1104/pp.110.161729
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • C4 PHOTOSYNTHESIS—THE BASICS
    • THE C4 SYNDROME—KRANZ ANATOMY AND VEIN SPACING
    • C4 PHOTOSYNTHESIS IS OF POLYPHYLETIC ORIGIN AND A QUANTITATIVE TRAIT
    • THE GENETIC ARCHITECTURE OF C4 PHOTOSYNTHESIS
    • GENE REGULATION IN C4 PHOTOSYNTHESIS
    • OUTLOOK
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

Plant Physiology: 154 (2)
Plant Physiology
Vol. 154, Issue 2
Oct 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • Flavonoids and Isoflavonoids: From Plant Biology to Agriculture and Neuroscience
  • The Power of Auxin in Plants
  • Lignin and Biomass: A Negative Correlation for Wood Formation and Lignin Content in Trees
Show more FUTURE PERSPECTIVES IN PLANT BIOLOGY

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Enhancing Photosynthesis

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Physiology Preview
  • Archive
  • Focus Collections
  • Classic Collections
  • The Plant Cell
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Journal Miles
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire