Skip to main content

Main menu

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Review ArticleTOPICAL REVIEW
You have accessRestricted Access

Vesicles versus Tubes: Is Endoplasmic Reticulum-Golgi Transport in Plants Fundamentally Different from Other Eukaryotes?

David G. Robinson, Federica Brandizzi, Chris Hawes, Akihiko Nakano
David G. Robinson
Centre for Organismal Studies, University of Heidelberg, D–69120 Heidelberg, Germany (D.G.R.);
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: david.robinson@urz.uni-heidelberg.de
Federica Brandizzi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Hawes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chris Hawes
Akihiko Nakano
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published June 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00124

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Electron microscopy of COPII budding. A and B, Transitional ER plus adjacent Golgi stacks in the green alga C. noctigama as seen in chemically fixed (A) and high-pressure frozen samples (B). The cis-trans (c and t) polarity of the Golgi stacks is clearly visible and so too are budding and released COPII vesicles (arrowheads). Putative COPI vesicles are marked with arrows. C, High-pressure frozen endosperm cell of Arabidopsis. Budding COPII vesicles are marked with arrowheads, and free putative COPII vesicles are marked with arrows. D to G, Collage of COPII budding profiles. Note that many of the buds are at the termini of ER cisternae. Note that the ER in high-pressure frozen samples is, in general, much more dilated than in chemically fixed samples; in C. noctigama, it is extremely dilated (the ER in B can be recognized by the ribosomes at the left of the vacuole-like structure). Bars = 200 nm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Golgi cisternae (rat sialyltransferase transmembrane domain and cytosolic tail fused to the yellow fluorescent protein, red) and the ERES marker (SEC16-GFP, green) visualized in tobacco leaf epidermal cells. Images from time-lapse sequence acquired at the cortical region of tobacco leaf epidermal cell with a Zeiss LSM510 confocal microscope. The Sec16 marker distributes at the peri-Golgi area (arrowheads) as well as to structures of unknown identity that are not associated with the Golgi marker (arrows; Takagi et al., 2013). The structures labeled by Sec16 can assume a ring-like shape (Takagi et al., 2013). Time of frames in the sequence is indicated at the left-hand corner of images (seconds). *, A chloroplast that is visible through chlorophyll autofluorescence. Bars = 5 and 1 μm (inset).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    A, Maximum-intensity projection in negative contrast of a stack of thin sections from a tomogram of a pea (Pisum sativum) root tip Golgi body and associated ER impregnated by the osmium zinc iodide technique. The reconstruction is presented at an angle to show a clear tubular connection between the ER and cis-Golgi. B, Inside face view of a dry-cleaved carrot (Daucus carota) suspension culture cell. The cell had been fixed on a coated EM grid, dehydrated, and critical point dried prior to dry cleaving on double-sided tape. The view onto the plasma membrane shows dark mitochondria (M), complete Golgi stacks in face view (G), cisternal ER (CER), and tubular ER (arrows). Note the huge difference between the diameter of a Golgi body and ER tubules.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Organization of the ERESs in the budding yeast S. cerevisiae. Left, Dual-color three-dimensional image of Sec13-GFP (ERES marker, green) and monomeric red fluorescent protein-Sec12 (bulk ER marker, red) obtained by SCLIM. Right, Two-dimensional slice image taken from the three-dimensional data. ERESs localize at the high-curvature domains of the ER, such as along tubules and at the edge of the sheet. Bar = 1 μm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    The cis-Golgi cisternae (monomeric red fluorescent protein-SYP31, magenta) and ERESs (SEC13-yellow fluorescent protein, green) visualized in tobacco BY2 cells. Confocal images were captured by SCLIM and reconstructed into three dimensions with deconvolution. A typical trajectory image from a three-dimensional time-lapse movie is shown. Almost all of the Golgi stacks were associated with bright spots of ERESs. From the magnified image (inset), we could observe the ERESs surrounding the cis-Golgi making ring-shaped fluorescent patterns. Bars = 5 and 1 μm (inset).

PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Physiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vesicles versus Tubes: Is Endoplasmic Reticulum-Golgi Transport in Plants Fundamentally Different from Other Eukaryotes?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Physiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Physiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Vesicles versus Tubes: Is Endoplasmic Reticulum-Golgi Transport in Plants Fundamentally Different from Other Eukaryotes?
David G. Robinson, Federica Brandizzi, Chris Hawes, Akihiko Nakano
Plant Physiology Jun 2015, 168 (2) 393-406; DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.00124

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Vesicles versus Tubes: Is Endoplasmic Reticulum-Golgi Transport in Plants Fundamentally Different from Other Eukaryotes?
David G. Robinson, Federica Brandizzi, Chris Hawes, Akihiko Nakano
Plant Physiology Jun 2015, 168 (2) 393-406; DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.00124
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • FEDERICA BRANDIZZI: THE SECRETORY UNITS MODEL FOR ER PROTEIN TRANSPORT IN HIGHLY VACUOLATED CELLS
    • CHRIS HAWES: LET IT BE TUBES
    • DAVID G. ROBINSON: THE ODDS ARE STACKED IN FAVOR OF VESICLES
    • AKIHIKO NAKANO: A COMMON MECHANISM FOR ER-TO-GOLGI TRAFFIC: A VIEW FROM SUPERRESOLUTION LIVE-IMAGING MICROSCOPY
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

Plant Physiology: 168 (2)
Plant Physiology
Vol. 168, Issue 2
Jun 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • Plant Secondary Metabolites as Defenses, Regulators, and Primary Metabolites: The Blurred Functional Trichotomy
  • Understanding Past, and Predicting Future, Niche Transitions based on Grass Flowering Time Variation
  • Targeting Root Ion Uptake Kinetics to Increase Plant Productivity and Nutrient Use Efficiency
Show more TOPICAL REVIEW

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Physiology Preview
  • Archive
  • Focus Collections
  • Classic Collections
  • The Plant Cell
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Journal Miles
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire