Skip to main content

Main menu

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleUPDATES - FOCUS ISSUE
Open Access

Winter Memory throughout the Plant Kingdom: Different Paths to Flowering

Frédéric Bouché, Daniel P. Woods, Richard M. Amasino
Frédéric Bouché
Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 (F.B., D.P.W., R.M.A.); and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Frédéric Bouché
Daniel P. Woods
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel P. Woods
Richard M. Amasino
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Richard M. Amasino
  • For correspondence: amasino@biochem.wisc.edu

Published January 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.01322

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.
Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Plants have evolved a variety of mechanisms to synchronize flowering with their environment to optimize reproductive success. Many species flower in spring when the photoperiod increases and the ambient temperatures become warmer. Winter annuals and biennials have evolved repression mechanisms that prevent the transition to reproductive development in the fall. These repressive processes can be overcome by the prolonged cold of winter through a process known as vernalization. The memory of the past winter is sometimes stored by epigenetic chromatin remodeling processes that provide competence to flower, and plants usually require additional inductive signals to flower in spring. The requirement for vernalization is widespread within groups of plants adapted to temperate climates; however, the genetic and biochemical frameworks controlling the response are distinct in different groups of plants, suggesting independent evolutionary origins. Here, we compare and contrast the vernalization pathways in different families of plants.

The timing of flowering is an important adaptive trait that often involves integrating multiple environmental cues to ensure reproductive success. In many species, the perception of daylength (photoperiod) is an essential environment cue as it provides reliable information about seasonal shifts (e.g. Song et al., 2015; Shim et al., 2017). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the so-called photoperiodic pathway is coupled to the sensing of ambient temperatures as warmer growth conditions accelerate flowering (Balasubramanian et al., 2006; Verhage et al., 2014). The perception of these environmental signals is superimposed on an internal developmental program that prevents flowering in young seedlings and promotes the transition to reproductive development in older plants (e.g. Yu et al., 2015). In many species adapted to temperate climates, the perception of seasonal changes also involves the acquisition of the competence to flower in response to an extended cold period, a process referred to as vernalization (e.g. Chouard, 1960; Preston and Sandve, 2013; Fig. 1A). In addition, some species acquire floral competence when exposed to the shorter photoperiod of winter (Purvis and Gregory, 1937; Wellensiek, 1985), but the molecular mechanisms controlling the so-called “short-day vernalization” are still unknown. Vernalization is adaptive in that it ensures that flowering does not occur before the freezing temperatures of winter, which would reduce reproductive success. After vernalization, however, many plants still require subsequent exposure to additional inductive signals to initiate reproductive development (e.g. Amasino, 2010).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Vernalization pathways in different plant groups. A, Phylogenetic tree of angiosperms (data from Jansen et al. [2007]) showing, on the right, the vernalization-responsive species mentioned in the main text. B to E, Schematic representation of the mechanisms governing vernalization in Arabidopsis (B), A. alpina (C), sugar beet (D), and core Pooideae (E).

Whether vernalization is required for flowering as well as the duration of cold exposure required to fulfill the vernalization requirement varies considerably among species and even within a species (Amasino, 2010; Duncan et al., 2015). Genotypes with a vernalization requirement are typically referred to as either winter annuals or biennials. There is not a sharp distinction between winter annuals and biennials, but the difference often relates to the extent to which the plant develops before winter and/or whether there is an obligate requirement for cold exposure to flower (e.g. Salisbury and Ross, 1992). When there is variation within a species for a vernalization requirement, the vernalization-requiring genotypes are often classified as winter annuals (or winter varieties), whereas the genotypes without vernalization requirement are often referred to as spring annuals or spring varieties because they will readily flower when planted after winter in the spring. These behavioral differences have a considerable influence on agricultural practices and are key to the adaptation of plant varieties to distinct climates. Here, we review the recent progress made in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms controlling vernalization with a focus on three different plant groups, Brassicales, Caryophyllales, and Poales.

THE MEMORY OF WINTER IN ARABIDOPSIS

The first insights into the molecular mechanisms controlling flowering were obtained in the model Brassicaceae, Arabidopsis (e.g. Pajoro et al., 2014). We know from studies in this model that the timing of flowering is a complex process that involves many genes in networks coordinating the initiation of flowering with environmental cues and developmental programs (e.g. Bouché et al., 2016). An essential downstream step of floral induction involves the up-regulation of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), a gene that encodes a small protein with similarity to phosphatidylethanolamine-binding proteins (Kobayashi et al., 1999). The FT protein, traditionally called “florigen,” is produced in leaf vascular tissues and moves through the phloem to the shoot apical meristem (SAM), where it interacts with the bZIP transcription factor FD and 14-3-3 proteins (Fig. 1B; Abe et al., 2005; Wigge et al., 2005; Corbesier et al., 2007; Taoka et al., 2011; Ho and Weigel, 2014). Together, these proteins form a floral activator complex that triggers the expression of several downstream targets, including SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO1 (SOC1), resulting in switching the fate of the SAM from initiating leaves to the production of flowers (Moon et al., 2005; Yoo et al., 2005). Pathways controlling flowering, including the vernalization pathway in Arabidopsis, act primarily through the modulation of the activity of the floral integrators FT and SOC1.

In Arabidopsis, natural diversity of the vernalization requirement is largely due to allelic variation at FRIGIDA (FRI) and its downstream target FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC); winter accessions bear dominant (i.e. active) alleles of both genes (Michaels and Amasino, 1999; Sheldon et al., 1999; Johanson et al., 2000; Gazzani et al., 2003). FRI is part of a complex involved in activating FLC, and FLC encodes a MADS-box protein that represses flowering by preventing the transcription of FT in leaves and SOC1 in the SAM (Michaels and Amasino, 1999; Sheldon et al., 2000; Hepworth et al., 2002; Helliwell et al., 2006; Searle et al., 2006). Thus, FLC repression of both leaf and meristem flowering pathways ensures a tight repression of flowering prior to cold in winter accessions. Upon cold exposure, the expression of FLC is stably repressed, thus conferring a molecular “memory” of the past winter (e.g. Amasino, 2010). Interestingly, the exposure to cold temperatures triggers a rapid decrease in FLC expression levels (i.e. within a few days), but only extended periods of cold ensure stable repression upon return to warmer growth temperatures (e.g. Finnegan, 2015). Although FLC repression is maintained throughout the plant’s life cycle, the repressed state of FLC is reset to an active state in the following generation, resulting in the re-establishment of the vernalization requirement (e.g. Schmitz and Amasino, 2007).

How cold represses FLC has been a long-standing question on which many studies have been focused. These studies have revealed multiple components of cold-mediated repression, including epigenetic modifications and antisense transcription (e.g. Kim and Sung, 2014), but the mechanisms controlling the initial decrease in FLC levels are not yet fully understood (Helliwell et al., 2015). The first vernalization-related, cold-induced change identified to date is the peak of expression of antisense FLC transcripts, collectively called COOLAIR, which are conserved in Arabidopsis relatives (Swiezewski et al., 2009; Castaings et al., 2014; Marquardt et al., 2014). The experimental reduction of COOLAIR expression prevents the vernalization-induced decrease in some activating chromatin marks at the FLC locus (Csorba et al., 2014), whereas the disruption of its promoter by T-DNA does not prevent the overall repression of FLC by vernalization (Helliwell et al., 2011). The peak of COOLAIR is followed by the increase in the expression of a sense noncoding RNA originating from the first intron of FLC, called COLDAIR (Heo and Sung, 2011). Although COLDAIR appears to be less evolutionary conserved than COOLAIR in Arabidopsis relatives (Castaings et al., 2014), the knock-down of its expression results in an increase of FLC expression associated with late flowering and reduced vernalization response (Heo and Sung, 2011). Following the expression of these noncoding RNAs, a key event is the cold-mediated induction of the gene encoding VERNALIZATION-INSENSITIVE3 (Sung and Amasino, 2004). This protein, which is necessary for the deposition of H3K27me3 repressive marks at the FLC locus, participates in the stable repression of FLC by the polycomb remodeling complex PRC2, as extensively reviewed elsewhere (e.g. Kim and Sung, 2014; Berry and Dean, 2015; Hepworth and Dean, 2015). The mitotic stability of vernalization-mediated FLC repression, as well as the subsequent resetting in the next generation, has provided a system to explore multiple aspects of the epigenetic control of gene expression. Other mechanisms have been postulated to regulate FLC at a molecular level, such as alternative splicing (Mahrez et al., 2016), and possibly posttranslational protein stabilization (Kwak et al., 2016). However, the extent to which these mechanisms participate in the control of the vernalization response in natural conditions is not well understood.

The repression of FLC has received much attention, but the regulation of additional genes appears to also contribute to the vernalization response in Arabidopsis as the flowering time of an flc null mutant is still accelerated by exposure to prolonged cold temperatures (Michaels and Amasino, 2001). Some obvious candidate genes to fulfill such a role are the paralogs of FLC, called FLOWERING LOCUS M (FLM) and MADS AFFECTING FLOWERING2-5 (MAF2-5), which also control flowering by repressing FT expression (Gu et al., 2013). Although initial studies reported somewhat contradictory results (Ratcliffe et al., 2001, 2003; Sung et al., 2006; Sheldon et al., 2009), the thorough characterization of the expression of the FLC family genes showed that they all respond to vernalizing treatments, albeit with different kinetics (Kim and Sung, 2013): FLC expression decreases rapidly upon cold exposure, whereas FLM and MAF2-3 expression only decreases after the cold period has ended, and MAF4-5 expression peaks during cold. The role of FLM and MAF2 in the vernalization response seems to be marginal (Kim and Sung, 2013); instead, these genes appear to be key to the repression of flowering at low ambient temperatures (Posé et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2013a; Rosloski et al., 2013; Airoldi et al., 2015; Sureshkumar et al., 2016). The maf3 single mutant does not show any phenotype, but the maf4 and maf5 single mutants are induced to flower by shorter cold periods, suggesting that MAF4 and MAF5 normally ensure that vernalization is not achieved by suboptimal durations of cold exposure (Kim and Sung, 2013). AGL19, another MADS-box protein closely related to SOC1, might also play a role in the vernalization pathway, as the agl19 and flc mutations show additive impairment of the vernalization response (Schönrock et al., 2006). AGL19 appears to be a floral activator up-regulated upon cold exposure through FLC-independent processes (Schönrock et al., 2006; Kang et al., 2015). Although further work is needed to assess the role of these additional components in the vernalization response, a recent study suggests that they might participate in environmental adaptation as their differential regulation is correlated with the flowering time of different accessions originating from an altitudinal gradient (Suter et al., 2014). In conclusion, there is still much to learn about FLC-independent vernalization events in Arabidopsis.

VERNALIZATION IN PERENNIAL BRASSICACEAE

In contrast to the annual habit of Arabidopsis, perennials live for many years and flower repeatedly throughout their lives. Critical to this life history strategy is that not all meristems are converted to inflorescences because some meristems must be reserved for next season’s growth. Indeed, the perennial life history of Arabis alpina, a close relative of Arabidopsis in the Brassicaceae, relies on the transient floral competence to ensure that not all meristems flower in a growing season. Some meristems undergo the floral transition in spring, while others remain vegetative to resume growth the following year. In A. alpina, the repression of flowering prior to vernalization is mediated by an FLC ortholog called PERPETUAL FLOWERING1 (PEP1), and repression of PEP1 during vernalization leads to increased expression of SOC1 and LEAFY, two essential promoters of flowering (Fig. 1C; Wang et al., 2009b, 2011a). As the gene name suggests, pep1 mutants flower rapidly without vernalization, and allelic variation at PEP1 contributes to the natural variation in flowering responses that exists among different accessions of A. alpina (Wang et al., 2009b; Albani et al., 2012). Unlike FLC in Arabidopsis, the expression of PEP1 is only transiently repressed by cold, and the meristems that transition to flowering during cold become inflorescences, whereas meristems at an immature stage remain vegetative (Wang et al., 2009b). Although FLC and PEP1 share several regulatory mechanisms, including chromatin remodeling and antisense transcription (Wang et al., 2009b; Castaings et al., 2014), the repressive H3K27me3 marks at PEP1 return to their original levels a few weeks after the end of the cold period, correlating with its transient repression (Wang et al., 2009b). Although it is not surprising that FLC and orthologs such as PEP1 are the basis of vernalization requirement in Brassicaceae, this difference in memory at the AtFLC locus versus lack of memory at the PEP1 locus is likely to be crucial for the perennial nature of A. alpina versus the annual habit of Arabidopsis.

The ability of a meristem to transition to flowering is also controlled by an age-dependent pathway. In the early stages of Arabidopsis development, the age-regulated miR156 promotes juvenility and represses flowering by posttranscriptionally down-regulating the expression of genes from the SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPLs) family, which are positive regulators of flowering (Cardon et al., 1997). As plants age, miR156 levels decrease, leading to an up-regulation of SPLs, which in turn induce miR172 expression; the levels of miR172 are thus negatively correlated with those of miR156 (Wu and Poethig, 2006; Wang et al., 2009a). Although this balance is conserved in many species, including rice, maize, and poplar (Chuck et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2011b; Xie et al., 2012), the levels of miR156 and miR172 are uncoupled in A. alpina, and exposure to cold temperatures triggers the expression of miR172 independently of miR156 (Bergonzi et al., 2013; Fig. 1C). PEP2, also identified through the screening for perpetual-flowering mutants, encodes a miR172-regulated APETALA2-like transcription factor that positively regulates PEP1 expression, thus contributing to the maintenance of the vegetative stage (Bergonzi et al., 2013). The cold-mediated induction of miR172 thus leads to the repression of PEP2 and, concomitantly, a decrease of PEP1 levels. In young meristems, however, high levels of miR156 block flowering, even in the absence of a PEP1-repressing effect. As observed in Arabidopsis, miR156 levels decrease as meristems age (Bergonzi et al., 2013), and only meristems with low miR156 levels can be induced to flower by prolonged exposure to cold temperatures. Interestingly, the decline in miR156 is blocked by cold, ensuring that flowering occurs only in plants that had previously grown rapidly under warmer ambient temperatures. In addition, TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1), a paralog of FT, represses flowering in immature meristems (Kobayashi et al., 1999; Wang et al., 2011a). The experimental down-regulation of AaTFL1 allows the vernalization-mediated floral induction of younger meristems and a response to shorter periods of cold exposure (Wang et al., 2011a). Such a role for TFL1 in the repression of flowering in young meristems has been observed in other perennial species, such as apple trees (Kotoda et al., 2006). TFL1 appears to set a minimal threshold of inductive signal that is required to trigger flowering, and participates in the selective induction of flowering in mature meristems only.

In another perennial Brassicaceae, Cardamine flexuosa, the mechanisms involved in the age-dependent ability to become vernalized appear to be less complex. As in Arabidopsis, the balance between miR156 and miR172 is maintained, and the age-driven decrease of miR156 is associated with a concomitant increase of miR172. In C. flexuosa, the prevention of flowering in young nonvernalized plants is ensured by two potent floral repressors, FLC and TARGET OF EAT1 (TOE1), an APETALA2-like transcription factor that is posttranscriptionally regulated by miR172 (Zhou et al., 2013). As the plants age, miR172 levels increase to repress TOE1, conferring to the meristem the competence to flower when exposed to a vernalizing treatment that transiently represses FLC expression (Zhou et al., 2013). Hence, distinct mechanisms using a similar framework evolved to confer perennial behavior in Brassicaceae.

VERNALIZATION SYSTEMS IN OTHER EUDICOTS

The key regulators of the vernalization pathway appear to be conserved within Brassicaceae; however, there is no strong evidence that similar components are involved in the vernalization systems of other eudicot families. Although the heterologous expression of FLC-like genes from different families is able to repress flowering in Arabidopsis flc mutants, their functional relevance in the control of vernalization response in their respective species is not clear (e.g. Reeves et al., 2007; Périlleux et al., 2013). Moreover, in Medicago truncatula, a legume with a vernalization response that diverged 90 to 100 million years ago from Arabidopsis (Zeng et al., 2014), neither FRI nor FLC orthologs have been identified (Hecht et al., 2005). However, a mutation of MtVERNALIZATION2 (MtVRN2), a member of the Polycomb Group Repressive Complex (VRN2-PRC2) responsible for the deposition of H3K27me3 repressive marks at the FLC locus in Arabidopsis (De Lucia et al., 2008), bypasses the vernalization requirement and leads to early flowering (Jaudal et al., 2016). Under long-day conditions, this phenotype requires a functional allele of the florigen FTa1 (Jaudal et al., 2016). Interestingly, FTa1 is up-regulated in the Mtvrn2 mutant, but does not display H3K27me3 alterations, suggesting that MtVRN2 represses genes upstream of FTa1 (Jaudal et al., 2016). VRN2 thus plays distinct roles in the control of flowering in different plant groups, acting as an essential component of the cold-mediated acquisition of the competence to flower in Arabidopsis and participating in the establishment of the vernalization requirement in M. truncatula.

To date, the best characterized vernalization system in a eudicot family other than Brassicaceae comes from sugar beet (Beta vulgaris), a Caryophyllales species that diverged from Arabidopsis soon after the eudicot-monocot split, about 110 million years ago (Zeng et al., 2014). Cultivated sugar beet is a biennial root crop that requires vernalization to flower, but many wild relatives behave as annuals. Unlike in the Brassicaceae, the ortholog of FLC from sugar beet plays at best a minor role in vernalization (Vogt et al., 2014). The biennial behavior of cultivated beet is associated with a recessive allele at the bolting locus B. This locus encodes the pseudo-response regulator (PRR) BOLTING TIME CONTROL1 (BvBTC1), a protein related to AtPRR7 (Pin et al., 2012), and the reduction of BvBTC1 activity by RNAi is sufficient to convert annual varieties into biennials. Recessive alleles of another bolting locus, called B2, confer a biennial behavior to plants homozygous for the annual allele BTC1 (Büttner et al., 2010). This locus encodes the DOUBLE B-BOX TYPE ZINC FINGER protein BvBBX19, which is orthologous to an Arabidopsis protein that negatively influences the induction of FT (Dally et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014). Interestingly, the expression of both BvBBX19 and BvBTC1 is diurnally regulated (Pin et al., 2012; Dally et al., 2014), and although the functional relationship between these two proteins is still unclear, they both participate in the regulation of an antagonistic pair of FT-like proteins, BvFT1 and BvFT2 (Fig. 1D; Pin et al., 2010, 2012; Dally et al., 2014). The short-day-expressed BvFT1 represses floral transition and negatively influences BvFT2 levels, whose expression is promoted by long days (Pin et al., 2010). In biennial beets that require vernalization, cold stably represses BvFT1 expression possibly through BvBTC1, relieving its repressive effect on BvFT2; BvFT2, in turn, is able to trigger flowering if plants are exposed to long days (Pin et al., 2010, 2012). The pathway through which BvBBX19 and BvBTC1 regulate the expression of BvFT genes is not known. Transcriptomic studies have provided some new candidate genes possibly involved in the vernalization pathway (Mutasa-Göttgens et al., 2012), and the publication of the sugar beet genome will undoubtedly open new perspectives for the dissection of the molecular mechanisms controlling its floral induction (Dohm et al., 2014).

VERNALIZATION SYSTEMS IN MONOCOTS

Vernalization responsiveness is also common in different species of monocots (Chouard, 1960; Brewster, 1987; Preston and Sandve, 2013). A few years ago, some key components of the system governing bulb formation and floral induction in onion (Allium cepa), a biennial species that belongs to the Asparagales order, were identified (Lee et al., 2013b). In the model proposed by Lee et al. (2013b), the initiation of bulbing and flowering are both controlled by FT-like genes. After planting in spring, high AcFT4 activity inhibits bulb formation by repressing AcFT1. Later in the season, inductive photoperiods down-regulate AcFT4, allowing the induction of the bulb-promoting AcFT1. During winter, vernalization leads to the up-regulation of another FT-like gene, AcFT2, which is necessary to promote flowering the next summer (Lee et al., 2013b). Further experiments are required to confirm and expand this model, but these preliminary results suggest a mechanism distinct from the vernalization system in Brassicales, Caryophyllales, and, as discussed below, Pooideae.

In Pooideae (temperate grasses), a grass subfamily that includes crown pooid crops such as wheat, oats, rye, and barley, allelic variation and functional studies have advanced the understanding of the molecular basis of vernalization. As in Arabidopsis, the timing of flowering is an important trait that is tightly controlled by genetic networks that integrate environmental cues, such as photoperiod and vernalization. After the identification of FLC in Arabidopsis, many efforts were directed toward the identification of its ortholog in vernalization-sensitive monocots, and a recent study identified ODDSOC2 as an ortholog in cereals (Ruelens et al., 2013). Although ODDSOC2 expression is suppressed by cold (Greenup et al., 2010), its specific role in the vernalization response is not clear. Instead, like in sugar beet, an FLC-independent pathway appears to be the major contributor to the vernalization requirement and response to prolonged cold exposure in winter cereal varieties.

Our current understanding is that the core regulatory mechanisms of vernalization in cereals includes three genes called VRN1, VRN2, and VRN3 (Yan et al., 2003, 2004, 2006). VRN3 is an ortholog of FT that interacts with an FD-like protein to trigger the expression of downstream targets, including the AP1/FUL ortholog VRN1 (Li and Dubcovsky, 2008; Li et al., 2015). VRN4, which resulted from a duplication of VRN1, displays a distinct expression pattern and appears to be associated with a weaker vernalization requirement (Kippes et al., 2015). As in Arabidopsis, the control of FT expression in leaves is key to the acquisition of the competence to flower in response to vernalization. Prior to cold, in winter cereal varieties, VRN1 is expressed at low levels, and the CONSTANS-like VRN2 gene plays a repressive role on FT (Fig. 1E; Danyluk et al., 2003; Yan et al., 2004; Chen and Dubcovsky, 2012). The role of VRN2 in conferring the vernalization requirement is supported by the fact that nonfunctional VRN2 alleles can confer a spring habit in diploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare), and the development of a triple VRN2 mutant in hexaploid wheat also results in rapid flowering and a reduced vernalization response (Kippes et al., 2016). In cereals, prolonged cold temperatures cause the repression of VRN2 and a quantitative induction of VRN1, which directly binds to the FT promoter to trigger its expression and also to VRN2 to presumably repress its expression (Yan et al., 2004; Shimada et al., 2009; Deng et al., 2015). The induction of VRN1 by cold is associated with removal of H3K27me3 repressive marks and deposition of H3K4me3 activating marks (Oliver et al., 2009), and also possibly involves posttranscriptional mechanisms (Xiao et al., 2014). The initial down-regulation of VRN2 during the cold occurs independently of VRN1, but VRN1 is critical for the stable repression of VRN2 after cold exposure ends (Chen and Dubcovsky, 2012). When induced, FT reinforces the expression of VRN1, thus creating a positive feedback loop that ensures the transition to the reproductive stage (Li and Dubcovsky, 2008). Hence, vernalization results in decreased VRN2 expression and increased VRN1 expression, facilitating the induction of FT expression upon extension of the photoperiod.

The photoperiodic activation of FT involves the PRR PHOTOPERIOD1 (PPD1), which is responsible for a large part of the natural variation in flowering observed in wheat and barley; varieties with active PPD1 contain high levels of FT and flower early, whereas ppd1 varieties have low FT and flower late (Turner et al., 2005; Beales et al., 2007; Kitagawa et al., 2012; Shaw et al., 2012). How PPD1 controls FT expression in grasses is not known, but it possibly acts through the transcriptional regulation of CONSTANS (Turner et al., 2005; Shaw et al., 2012). More recently, the light receptor for the photoperiodic pathway was identified as PHYTOCHROME C (PHYC); phyC mutants flower very late under inductive photoperiods (Chen et al., 2014; Woods et al., 2014b).

Although there has been great progress in understanding vernalization at a molecular level from studying wheat and barley, much remains to be learned, including identifying additional components within the vernalization pathway and the extent to which vernalization pathways are conserved throughout the grasses. Pooideae is a diverse grass subfamily comprising ∼3,800 species with a large geographical range, predominantly in higher latitudes (Mannion, 1997; Grass Phylogeny Working Group, 2001). Recently it has been shown that vernalization responsiveness is widespread throughout Pooideae, although there have been several independent losses of a vernalization requirement (McKeown et al., 2016; Woods et al., 2016). Furthermore, studies in the small temperate grass model Brachypodium distachyon, which is an early diverging pooid sister to the crown pooid clade, have contributed to understanding the evolution of vernalization systems in pooids (Woods and Amasino, 2015). Like wheat and barley, B. distachyon is a long-day plant that exhibits an extensive natural variation of flowering behavior across accessions with respect to photoperiod and vernalization responses (Ream et al., 2014; Tyler et al., 2016) and has a “memory” of winter (Woods et al., 2014a). Additionally, B. distachyon contains orthologs of all of the VRN genes discovered in wheat and barley, and these genes also likely contribute to natural variation in flowering responses among different accessions of B. distachyon (Higgins et al., 2010; Woods et al., 2016, 2017; Bettgenhaeuser et al., 2017). Genetic and physiological characterizations carried out in different Pooideae species, including B. distachyon, confirms the conservation of VRN1 and VRN3/FT as promoters and VRN2 as a repressor of flowering (Lv et al., 2014; Ream et al., 2014; Woods et al., 2016). However, the cold- and VRN1-mediated repression of VRN2 is restricted to core Pooideae, such as wheat and barley, suggesting that the establishment of the VRN1-VRN2 loop occurred late in the diversification of temperate grasses (Woods et al., 2016). In contrast, the induction of VRN1 by cold evolved early in the diversification of Pooideae, and VRN1 is induced following cold exposure even under noninductive conditions (McKeown et al., 2016). Hence, whereas the memory of winter in Arabidopsis is controlled by the stable repression of the floral inhibitor FLC, this memory appears to rely, in large part at least, on the stable activation of the floral promoter VRN1 in Pooideae (Woods et al., 2014a).

CONCLUDING REMARKS

The exploration of the vernalization systems in different plant groups reveals distinct pathways that share a common principle: in vernalization-responsive species, there is a block to flowering (a vernalization requirement), and cold provides competence to flower (overcomes the block to flowering), whether it is via the suppression of a floral repressor (e.g. Arabidopsis) or the activation of a floral promoter (e.g. Pooideae). Moreover, the induction of flowering typically requires additional inductive signals. In most vernalization-requiring species, the transition to floral development upon perception of these signals may occur long after return to warmer growth temperatures, revealing a memory of the past winter. Other species, such as the Brassicaceae A. alpina, exhibit a transient response to cold temperatures, and this absence of winter memory is key to its perennial growth habit because only meristems that are mature at the start of the cold exposure will undergo floral transition, while the other meristems remain vegetative to maintain growth from year to year. Evolution of unique vernalization systems is key to the establishment of a species life history strategy. Further dissection of the vernalization pathways throughout angiosperm lineages is likely to uncover new mechanisms establishing the memory of winter (see “Outstanding Questions”) and shed light on the role of vernalization in the diversification of plant groups.

Footnotes

  • www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.16.01322

  • The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Richard M. Amasino (amasino{at}biochem.wisc.edu).

  • F.B., D.P.W., and R.M.A. wrote the article.

  • ↵1 This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant no. IOS–1258126), the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (Department of Energy Biological and Environmental Research Office of Science grant no. DE–FCO2–07ER64494), and the University of Wisconsin-Madison to R.M.A. F.B. is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Belgian American Educational Foundation.

  • ↵[OPEN] Articles can be viewed without a subscription.

  • Received August 23, 2016.
  • Accepted September 21, 2016.
  • Published October 18, 2016.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Abe M,
    2. Kobayashi Y,
    3. Yamamoto S,
    4. Daimon Y,
    5. Yamaguchi A,
    6. Ikeda Y,
    7. Ichinoki H,
    8. Notaguchi M,
    9. Goto K,
    10. Araki T
    (2005) FD, a bZIP protein mediating signals from the floral pathway integrator FT at the shoot apex. Science 309: 1052–1056
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Airoldi CA,
    2. McKay M,
    3. Davies B
    (2015) MAF2 is regulated by temperature-dependent splicing and represses flowering at low temperatures in parallel with FLM. PLoS One 10: e0126516
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Albani MC,
    2. Castaings L,
    3. Wötzel S,
    4. Mateos JL,
    5. Wunder J,
    6. Wang R,
    7. Reymond M,
    8. Coupland G
    (2012) PEP1 of Arabis alpina is encoded by two overlapping genes that contribute to natural genetic variation in perennial flowering. PLoS Genet 8: e1003130
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Amasino R
    (2010) Seasonal and developmental timing of flowering. Plant J 61: 1001–1013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Balasubramanian S,
    2. Sureshkumar S,
    3. Lempe J,
    4. Weigel D
    (2006) Potent induction of Arabidopsis thaliana flowering by elevated growth temperature. PLoS Genet 2: e106
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Beales J,
    2. Turner A,
    3. Griffiths S,
    4. Snape JW,
    5. Laurie DA
    (2007) A pseudo-response regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 115: 721–733
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Bergonzi S,
    2. Albani MC,
    3. Ver Loren van Themaat E,
    4. Nordström KJV,
    5. Wang R,
    6. Schneeberger K,
    7. Moerland PD,
    8. Coupland G
    (2013) Mechanisms of age-dependent response to winter temperature in perennial flowering of Arabis alpina. Science 340: 1094–1097
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Berry S,
    2. Dean C
    (2015) Environmental perception and epigenetic memory: mechanistic insight through FLC. Plant J 83: 133–148
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Bettgenhaeuser J,
    2. Corke FMK,
    3. Opanowicz M,
    4. Green P,
    5. Hernández-Pinzón I,
    6. Doonan JH,
    7. Moscou MJ
    (2017) Natural variation in Brachypodium links vernalization and flowering time loci as major flowering determinants. Plant Physiol 173: 256–268
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Bouché F,
    2. Lobet G,
    3. Tocquin P,
    4. Périlleux C
    (2016) FLOR-ID: an interactive database of flowering-time gene networks in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res (D1) 44: D1167–D1171
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. JG Atherton
    1. Brewster JL
    (1987) Vernalization in the onion - a quantitative approach. In JG Atherton, ed, Manipulation of Flowering. Butterworths, London, pp 171–183
  12. ↵
    1. Büttner B,
    2. Abou-Elwafa SF,
    3. Zhang W,
    4. Jung C,
    5. Müller AE
    (2010) A survey of EMS-induced biennial Beta vulgaris mutants reveals a novel bolting locus which is unlinked to the bolting gene B. Theor Appl Genet 121: 1117–1131
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Cardon GH,
    2. Höhmann S,
    3. Nettesheim K,
    4. Saedler H,
    5. Huijser P
    (1997) Functional analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana SBP-box gene SPL3: a novel gene involved in the floral transition. Plant J 12: 367–377
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Castaings L,
    2. Bergonzi S,
    3. Albani MC,
    4. Kemi U,
    5. Savolainen O,
    6. Coupland G
    (2014) Evolutionary conservation of cold-induced antisense RNAs of FLOWERING LOCUS C in Arabidopsis thaliana perennial relatives. Nat Commun 5: 4457
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Chen A,
    2. Dubcovsky J
    (2012) Wheat TILLING mutants show that the vernalization gene VRN1 down-regulates the flowering repressor VRN2 in leaves but is not essential for flowering. PLoS Genet 8: e1003134
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Chen A,
    2. Li C,
    3. Hu W,
    4. Lau MY,
    5. Lin H,
    6. Rockwell NC,
    7. Martin SS,
    8. Jernstedt JA,
    9. Lagarias JC,
    10. Dubcovsky J
    (2014) Phytochrome C plays a major role in the acceleration of wheat flowering under long-day photoperiod. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 10037–10044
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Chouard P
    (1960) Vernalization and its relations to dormancy. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 11: 191–238
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Chuck G,
    2. Cigan AM,
    3. Saeteurn K,
    4. Hake S
    (2007) The heterochronic maize mutant Corngrass1 results from overexpression of a tandem microRNA. Nat Genet 39: 544–549
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Corbesier L,
    2. Vincent C,
    3. Jang S,
    4. Fornara F,
    5. Fan Q,
    6. Searle I,
    7. Giakountis A,
    8. Farrona S,
    9. Gissot L,
    10. Turnbull C, et al.
    (2007) FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science 316: 1030–1033
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Csorba T,
    2. Questa JI,
    3. Sun Q,
    4. Dean C
    (2014) Antisense COOLAIR mediates the coordinated switching of chromatin states at FLC during vernalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 16160–16165
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Dally N,
    2. Xiao K,
    3. Holtgräwe D,
    4. Jung C
    (2014) The B2 flowering time locus of beet encodes a zinc finger transcription factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 10365–10370
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Danyluk J,
    2. Kane NA,
    3. Breton G,
    4. Limin AE,
    5. Fowler DB,
    6. Sarhan F
    (2003) TaVRT-1, a putative transcription factor associated with vegetative to reproductive transition in cereals. Plant Physiol 132: 1849–1860
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. De Lucia F,
    2. Crevillen P,
    3. Jones AME,
    4. Greb T,
    5. Dean C
    (2008) A PHD-polycomb repressive complex 2 triggers the epigenetic silencing of FLC during vernalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 16831–16836
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Deng W,
    2. Casao MC,
    3. Wang P,
    4. Sato K,
    5. Hayes PM,
    6. Finnegan EJ,
    7. Trevaskis B
    (2015) Direct links between the vernalization response and other key traits of cereal crops. Nat Commun 6: 5882
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Dohm JC,
    2. Minoche AE,
    3. Holtgräwe D,
    4. Capella-Gutiérrez S,
    5. Zakrzewski F,
    6. Tafer H,
    7. Rupp O,
    8. Sörensen TR,
    9. Stracke R,
    10. Reinhardt R, et al.
    (2014) The genome of the recently domesticated crop plant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Nature 505: 546–549
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Duncan S,
    2. Holm S,
    3. Questa J,
    4. Irwin J,
    5. Grant A,
    6. Dean C
    (2015) Seasonal shift in timing of vernalization as an adaptation to extreme winter. eLife 4: e06620
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Finnegan EJ
    (2015) Time-dependent stabilization of the +1 nucleosome is an early step in the transition to stable cold-induced repression of FLC. Plant J 84: 875–885
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Gazzani S,
    2. Gendall AR,
    3. Lister C,
    4. Dean C
    (2003) Analysis of the molecular basis of flowering time variation in Arabidopsis accessions. Plant Physiol 132: 1107–1114
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Grass Phylogeny Working Group
    (2001) Phylogeny and subfamilial classification of the grasses (Poaceae). Ann Mo Bot Gard 88: 373–457
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Greenup AG,
    2. Sasani S,
    3. Oliver SN,
    4. Talbot MJ,
    5. Dennis ES,
    6. Hemming MN,
    7. Trevaskis B
    (2010) ODDSOC2 is a MADS box floral repressor that is down-regulated by vernalization in temperate cereals. Plant Physiol 153: 1062–1073
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Gu X,
    2. Le C,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Li Z,
    5. Jiang D,
    6. Wang Y,
    7. He Y
    (2013) Arabidopsis FLC clade members form flowering-repressor complexes coordinating responses to endogenous and environmental cues. Nat Commun 4: 1947
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Hecht V,
    2. Foucher F,
    3. Ferrándiz C,
    4. Macknight R,
    5. Navarro C,
    6. Morin J,
    7. Vardy ME,
    8. Ellis N,
    9. Beltrán JP,
    10. Rameau C, et al.
    (2005) Conservation of Arabidopsis flowering genes in model legumes. Plant Physiol 137: 1420–1434
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Helliwell CA,
    2. Anderssen RS,
    3. Robertson M,
    4. Finnegan EJ
    (2015) How is FLC repression initiated by cold? Trends Plant Sci 20: 76–82
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Helliwell CA,
    2. Robertson M,
    3. Finnegan EJ,
    4. Buzas DM,
    5. Dennis ES
    (2011) Vernalization-repression of Arabidopsis FLC requires promoter sequences but not antisense transcripts. PLoS One 6: e21513
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Helliwell CA,
    2. Wood CC,
    3. Robertson M,
    4. James Peacock W,
    5. Dennis ES
    (2006) The Arabidopsis FLC protein interacts directly in vivo with SOC1 and FT chromatin and is part of a high-molecular-weight protein complex. Plant J 46: 183–192
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Heo JB,
    2. Sung S
    (2011) Vernalization-mediated epigenetic silencing by a long intronic noncoding RNA. Science 331: 76–79
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Hepworth J,
    2. Dean C
    (2015) Flowering Locus C’s lessons: conserved chromatin switches underpinning developmental timing and adaptation. Plant Physiol 168: 1237–1245
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Hepworth SR,
    2. Valverde F,
    3. Ravenscroft D,
    4. Mouradov A,
    5. Coupland G
    (2002) Antagonistic regulation of flowering-time gene SOC1 by CONSTANS and FLC via separate promoter motifs. EMBO J 21: 4327–4337
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Higgins JA,
    2. Bailey PC,
    3. Laurie DA
    (2010) Comparative genomics of flowering time pathways using Brachypodium distachyon as a model for the temperate grasses. PLoS One 5: e10065
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Ho WWH,
    2. Weigel D
    (2014) Structural features determining flower-promoting activity of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T. Plant Cell 26: 552–564
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Jansen RK,
    2. Cai Z,
    3. Raubeson LA,
    4. Daniell H,
    5. Depamphilis CW,
    6. Leebens-Mack J,
    7. Müller KF,
    8. Guisinger-Bellian M,
    9. Haberle RC,
    10. Hansen AK, et al.
    (2007) Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 19369–19374
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Jaudal M,
    2. Zhang L,
    3. Che C,
    4. Hurley DG,
    5. Thomson G,
    6. Wen J,
    7. Mysore KS,
    8. Putterill J
    (2016) MtVRN2 is a Polycomb VRN2-like gene which represses the transition to flowering in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J 86: 145–160
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Johanson U,
    2. West J,
    3. Lister C,
    4. Michaels S,
    5. Amasino R,
    6. Dean C
    (2000) Molecular analysis of FRIGIDA, a major determinant of natural variation in Arabidopsis flowering time. Science 290: 344–347
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Kang M-J,
    2. Jin H-S,
    3. Noh Y-S,
    4. Noh B
    (2015) Repression of flowering under a noninductive photoperiod by the HDA9-AGL19-FT module in Arabidopsis. New Phytol 206: 281–294
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Kim DH,
    2. Sung S
    (2013) Coordination of the vernalization response through a VIN3 and FLC gene family regulatory network in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25: 454–469
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Kim D-H,
    2. Sung S
    (2014) Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms underlying vernalization. The Arabidopsis Book 12: e0171, doi/10.199/tab.0171
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Kippes N,
    2. Chen A,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Lukaszewski AJ,
    5. Dubcovsky J
    (2016) Development and characterization of a spring hexaploid wheat line with no functional VRN2 genes. Theor Appl Genet 129: 1417–1428
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Kippes N,
    2. Debernardi JM,
    3. Vasquez-Gross HA,
    4. Akpinar BA,
    5. Budak H,
    6. Kato K,
    7. Chao S,
    8. Akhunov E,
    9. Dubcovsky J
    (2015) Identification of the VERNALIZATION 4 gene reveals the origin of spring growth habit in ancient wheats from South Asia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: E5401–E5410
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Kitagawa S,
    2. Shimada S,
    3. Murai K
    (2012) Effect of Ppd-1 on the expression of flowering-time genes in vegetative and reproductive growth stages of wheat. Genes Genet Syst 87: 161–168
    OpenUrlPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Kobayashi Y,
    2. Kaya H,
    3. Goto K,
    4. Iwabuchi M,
    5. Araki T
    (1999) A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. Science 286: 1960–1962
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Kotoda N,
    2. Iwanami H,
    3. Takahashi S,
    4. Abe K
    (2006) Antisense expression of MdTFL1, a TFL1-like gene, reduces the juvenile phase in apple. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 131: 74–81
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Kwak JS,
    2. Son GH,
    3. Kim S-I,
    4. Song JT,
    5. Seo HS
    (2016) Arabidopsis HIGH PLOIDY2 sumoylates and stabilizes Flowering Locus C through its E3 ligase activity. Front Plant Sci 7: 530
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Lee JH,
    2. Ryu HS,
    3. Chung KS,
    4. Posé D,
    5. Kim S,
    6. Schmid M,
    7. Ahn JH
    (2013a) Regulation of temperature-responsive flowering by MADS-box transcription factor repressors. Science 342: 628–632
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Lee R,
    2. Baldwin S,
    3. Kenel F,
    4. McCallum J,
    5. Macknight R
    (2013b) FLOWERING LOCUS T genes control onion bulb formation and flowering. Nat Commun 4: 2884
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Li C,
    2. Dubcovsky J
    (2008) Wheat FT protein regulates VRN1 transcription through interactions with FDL2. Plant J 55: 543–554
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Li C,
    2. Lin H,
    3. Dubcovsky J
    (2015) Factorial combinations of protein interactions generate a multiplicity of florigen activation complexes in wheat and barley. Plant J 84: 70–82
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Lv B,
    2. Nitcher R,
    3. Han X,
    4. Wang S,
    5. Ni F,
    6. Li K,
    7. Pearce S,
    8. Wu J,
    9. Dubcovsky J,
    10. Fu D
    (2014) Characterization of FLOWERING LOCUS T1 (FT1) gene in Brachypodium and wheat. PLoS One 9: e94171
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Mahrez W,
    2. Shin J,
    3. Muñoz-Viana R,
    4. Figueiredo DD,
    5. Trejo-Arellano MS,
    6. Exner V,
    7. Siretskiy A,
    8. Gruissem W,
    9. Köhler C,
    10. Hennig L
    (2016) BRR2a affects flowering time via FLC splicing. PLoS Genet 12: e1005924
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Mannion AM
    (1997) Global Environmental Change: A Natural and Cultural Environmental History. Routlege, Abingdon-on-Thames, UK
  60. ↵
    1. Marquardt S,
    2. Raitskin O,
    3. Wu Z,
    4. Liu F,
    5. Sun Q,
    6. Dean C
    (2014) Functional consequences of splicing of the antisense transcript COOLAIR on FLC transcription. Mol Cell 54: 156–165
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. McKeown M,
    2. Schubert M,
    3. Marcussen T,
    4. Fjellheim S,
    5. Preston JC
    (2016) Evidence for an early origin of vernalization responsiveness in temperate Pooideae grasses. Plant Physiol 172: 416–426
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Michaels SD,
    2. Amasino RM
    (1999) FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering. Plant Cell 11: 949–956
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. Michaels SD,
    2. Amasino RM
    (2001) Loss of FLOWERING LOCUS C activity eliminates the late-flowering phenotype of FRIGIDA and autonomous pathway mutations but not responsiveness to vernalization. Plant Cell 13: 935–941
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. Moon J,
    2. Lee H,
    3. Kim M,
    4. Lee I
    (2005) Analysis of flowering pathway integrators in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol 46: 292–299
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Mutasa-Göttgens ES,
    2. Joshi A,
    3. Holmes HF,
    4. Hedden P,
    5. Göttgens B
    (2012) A new RNASeq-based reference transcriptome for sugar beet and its application in transcriptome-scale analysis of vernalization and gibberellin responses. BMC Genomics 13: 99
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Oliver SN,
    2. Finnegan EJ,
    3. Dennis ES,
    4. Peacock WJ,
    5. Trevaskis B
    (2009) Vernalization-induced flowering in cereals is associated with changes in histone methylation at the VERNALIZATION1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 8386–8391
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    1. Pajoro A,
    2. Biewers S,
    3. Dougali E,
    4. Leal Valentim F,
    5. Mendes MA,
    6. Porri A,
    7. Coupland G,
    8. Van de Peer Y,
    9. van Dijk ADJ,
    10. Colombo L, et al.
    (2014) The (r)evolution of gene regulatory networks controlling Arabidopsis plant reproduction: a two-decade history. J Exp Bot 65: 4731–4745
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    1. Périlleux C,
    2. Pieltain A,
    3. Jacquemin G,
    4. Bouché F,
    5. Detry N,
    6. D’Aloia M,
    7. Thiry L,
    8. Aljochim P,
    9. Delansnay M,
    10. Mathieu A-S, et al.
    (2013) A root chicory MADS box sequence and the Arabidopsis flowering repressor FLC share common features that suggest conserved function in vernalization and de-vernalization responses. Plant J 75: 390–402
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Pin PA,
    2. Benlloch R,
    3. Bonnet D,
    4. Wremerth-Weich E,
    5. Kraft T,
    6. Gielen JJL,
    7. Nilsson O
    (2010) An antagonistic pair of FT homologs mediates the control of flowering time in sugar beet. Science 330: 1397–1400
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Pin PA,
    2. Zhang W,
    3. Vogt SH,
    4. Dally N,
    5. Büttner B,
    6. Schulze-Buxloh G,
    7. Jelly NS,
    8. Chia TYP,
    9. Mutasa-Göttgens ES,
    10. Dohm JC, et al.
    (2012) The role of a pseudo-response regulator gene in life cycle adaptation and domestication of beet. Curr Biol 22: 1095–1101
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Posé D,
    2. Verhage L,
    3. Ott F,
    4. Yant L,
    5. Mathieu J,
    6. Angenent GC,
    7. Immink RGH,
    8. Schmid M
    (2013) Temperature-dependent regulation of flowering by antagonistic FLM variants. Nature 503: 414–417
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Preston JC,
    2. Sandve SR
    (2013) Adaptation to seasonality and the winter freeze. Front Plant Sci 4: 167
    OpenUrlPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Purvis ON,
    2. Gregory FG
    (1937) Studies in vernalisation of cereals: I. A comparative study of vernalisation of winter rye by low temperature and by short days. Ann Bot (Lond) 1: 569–592
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    1. Ratcliffe OJ,
    2. Kumimoto RW,
    3. Wong BJ,
    4. Riechmann JL
    (2003) Analysis of the Arabidopsis MADS AFFECTING FLOWERING gene family: MAF2 prevents vernalization by short periods of cold. Plant Cell 15: 1159–1169
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    1. Ratcliffe OJ,
    2. Nadzan GC,
    3. Reuber TL,
    4. Riechmann JL
    (2001) Regulation of flowering in Arabidopsis by an FLC homologue. Plant Physiol 126: 122–132
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Ream TS,
    2. Woods DP,
    3. Schwartz CJ,
    4. Sanabria CP,
    5. Mahoy JA,
    6. Walters EM,
    7. Kaeppler HF,
    8. Amasino RM
    (2014) Interaction of photoperiod and vernalization determines flowering time of Brachypodium distachyon. Plant Physiol 164: 694–709
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    1. Reeves PA,
    2. He Y,
    3. Schmitz RJ,
    4. Amasino RM,
    5. Panella LW,
    6. Richards CM
    (2007) Evolutionary conservation of the FLOWERING LOCUS C-mediated vernalization response: evidence from the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Genetics 176: 295–307
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    1. Rosloski SM,
    2. Singh A,
    3. Jali SS,
    4. Balasubramanian S,
    5. Weigel D,
    6. Grbic V
    (2013) Functional analysis of splice variant expression of MADS AFFECTING FLOWERING 2 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol 81: 57–69
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Ruelens P,
    2. de Maagd RA,
    3. Proost S,
    4. Theißen G,
    5. Geuten K,
    6. Kaufmann K
    (2013) FLOWERING LOCUS C in monocots and the tandem origin of angiosperm-specific MADS-box genes. Nat Commun 4: 2280
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Salisbury F,
    2. Ross C
    (1992) Plant Physiology, Ed 4. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA
  81. ↵
    1. Schmitz RJ,
    2. Amasino RM
    (2007) Vernalization: a model for investigating epigenetics and eukaryotic gene regulation in plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 1769: 269–275
    OpenUrlPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Schönrock N,
    2. Bouveret R,
    3. Leroy O,
    4. Borghi L,
    5. Köhler C,
    6. Gruissem W,
    7. Hennig L
    (2006) Polycomb-group proteins repress the floral activator AGL19 in the FLC-independent vernalization pathway. Genes Dev 20: 1667–1678
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. ↵
    1. Searle I,
    2. He Y,
    3. Turck F,
    4. Vincent C,
    5. Fornara F,
    6. Kröber S,
    7. Amasino RA,
    8. Coupland G
    (2006) The transcription factor FLC confers a flowering response to vernalization by repressing meristem competence and systemic signaling in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 20: 898–912
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    1. Shaw LM,
    2. Turner AS,
    3. Laurie DA
    (2012) The impact of photoperiod insensitive Ppd-1a mutations on the photoperiod pathway across the three genomes of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant J 71: 71–84
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Sheldon CC,
    2. Burn JE,
    3. Perez PP,
    4. Metzger J,
    5. Edwards JA,
    6. Peacock WJ,
    7. Dennis ES
    (1999) The FLF MADS box gene: a repressor of flowering in Arabidopsis regulated by vernalization and methylation. Plant Cell 11: 445–458
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  86. ↵
    1. Sheldon CC,
    2. Finnegan EJ,
    3. Peacock WJ,
    4. Dennis ES
    (2009) Mechanisms of gene repression by vernalization in Arabidopsis. Plant J 59: 488–498
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Sheldon CC,
    2. Rouse DT,
    3. Finnegan EJ,
    4. Peacock WJ,
    5. Dennis ES
    (2000) The molecular basis of vernalization: the central role of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 3753–3758
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  88. ↵
    1. Shim JS,
    2. Kubota A,
    3. Imaizumi T
    (2017) Circadian clock and photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis: CONSTANS is a hub for signal integration. Plant Physiol 173: 5–15
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  89. ↵
    1. Shimada S,
    2. Ogawa T,
    3. Kitagawa S,
    4. Suzuki T,
    5. Ikari C,
    6. Shitsukawa N,
    7. Abe T,
    8. Kawahigashi H,
    9. Kikuchi R,
    10. Handa H, et al.
    (2009) A genetic network of flowering-time genes in wheat leaves, in which an APETALA1/FRUITFULL-like gene, VRN1, is upstream of FLOWERING LOCUS T. Plant J 58: 668–681
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Song YH,
    2. Shim JS,
    3. Kinmonth-Schultz HA,
    4. Imaizumi T
    (2015) Photoperiodic flowering: time measurement mechanisms in leaves. Annu Rev Plant Biol 66: 441–464
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Sung S,
    2. Amasino RM
    (2004) Vernalization in Arabidopsis thaliana is mediated by the PHD finger protein VIN3. Nature 427: 159–164
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    1. Sung S,
    2. Schmitz RJ,
    3. Amasino RM
    (2006) A PHD finger protein involved in both the vernalization and photoperiod pathways in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 20: 3244–3248
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  93. ↵
    1. Sureshkumar S,
    2. Dent C,
    3. Seleznev A,
    4. Tasset C,
    5. Balasubramanian S
    (2016) Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay modulates FLM-dependent thermosensory flowering response in Arabidopsis. Nat Plants 2: 16055
    OpenUrl
  94. ↵
    1. Suter L,
    2. Rüegg M,
    3. Zemp N,
    4. Hennig L,
    5. Widmer A
    (2014) Gene regulatory variation mediates flowering responses to vernalization along an altitudinal gradient in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 166: 1928–1942
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  95. ↵
    1. Swiezewski S,
    2. Liu F,
    3. Magusin A,
    4. Dean C
    (2009) Cold-induced silencing by long antisense transcripts of an Arabidopsis Polycomb target. Nature 462: 799–802
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Taoka K,
    2. Ohki I,
    3. Tsuji H,
    4. Furuita K,
    5. Hayashi K,
    6. Yanase T,
    7. Yamaguchi M,
    8. Nakashima C,
    9. Purwestri YA,
    10. Tamaki S, et al.
    (2011) 14-3-3 proteins act as intracellular receptors for rice Hd3a florigen. Nature 476: 332–335
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Turner A,
    2. Beales J,
    3. Faure S,
    4. Dunford RP,
    5. Laurie DA
    (2005) The pseudo-response regulator Ppd-H1 provides adaptation to photoperiod in barley. Science 310: 1031–1034
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  98. ↵
    1. Tyler L,
    2. Lee SJ,
    3. Young ND,
    4. DeIulio GA,
    5. Benavente E,
    6. Reagon M,
    7. Sysopha J,
    8. Baldini RM,
    9. Troìa A,
    10. Hazen SP, et al.
    (2016) Population structure in the model grass Brachypodium distachyon is highly correlated with flowering differences across broad geographic areas. Plant Genome 9: 2
    OpenUrl
  99. ↵
    1. Verhage L,
    2. Angenent GC,
    3. Immink RGH
    (2014) Research on floral timing by ambient temperature comes into blossom. Trends Plant Sci 19: 583–591
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. ↵
    1. Vogt SH,
    2. Weyens G,
    3. Lefèbvre M,
    4. Bork B,
    5. Schechert A,
    6. Müller AE
    (2014) The FLC-like gene BvFL1 is not a major regulator of vernalization response in biennial beets. Front Plant Sci 5: 146
    OpenUrlPubMed
  101. ↵
    1. Wang CQ,
    2. Guthrie C,
    3. Sarmast MK,
    4. Dehesh K
    (2014) BBX19 interacts with CONSTANS to repress FLOWERING LOCUS T transcription, defining a flowering time checkpoint in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26: 3589–3602
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  102. ↵
    1. Wang J-W,
    2. Czech B,
    3. Weigel D
    (2009a) miR156-regulated SPL transcription factors define an endogenous flowering pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 138: 738–749
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. ↵
    1. Wang J-W,
    2. Park MY,
    3. Wang L-J,
    4. Koo Y,
    5. Chen X-Y,
    6. Weigel D,
    7. Poethig RS
    (2011b) miRNA control of vegetative phase change in trees. PLoS Genet 7: e1002012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Wang R,
    2. Albani MC,
    3. Vincent C,
    4. Bergonzi S,
    5. Luan M,
    6. Bai Y,
    7. Kiefer C,
    8. Castillo R,
    9. Coupland G
    (2011a) Aa TFL1 confers an age-dependent response to vernalization in perennial Arabis alpina. Plant Cell 23: 1307–1321
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  105. ↵
    1. Wang R,
    2. Farrona S,
    3. Vincent C,
    4. Joecker A,
    5. Schoof H,
    6. Turck F,
    7. Alonso-Blanco C,
    8. Coupland G,
    9. Albani MC
    (2009b) PEP1 regulates perennial flowering in Arabis alpina. Nature 459: 423–427
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. ↵
    1. Wellensiek SJ
    (1985) Campanula medium. In AH Halevey, ed, CRC Handbook of Flowering, Vol 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 123–126
  107. ↵
    1. Wigge PA,
    2. Kim MC,
    3. Jaeger KE,
    4. Busch W,
    5. Schmid M,
    6. Lohmann JU,
    7. Weigel D
    (2005) Integration of spatial and temporal information during floral induction in Arabidopsis. Science 309: 1056–1059
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  108. ↵
    1. JP Vogel
    1. Woods DP,
    2. Amasino RM
    (2015) Dissecting the control of flowering time in grasses using Brachypodium distachyon. In JP Vogel, ed, Genetics and Genomics of Brachypodium. Springer, New York, pp 259–273
  109. ↵
    1. Woods DP,
    2. Bednarek R,
    3. Bouché F,
    4. Gordon SP,
    5. Vogel JP,
    6. Garvin DF,
    7. Amasino RM
    (2017) Genetic architecture of flowering-time variation in Brachypodium distachyon. Plant Physiol 173: 269–279
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  110. ↵
    1. Woods DP,
    2. McKeown MA,
    3. Dong Y,
    4. Preston JC,
    5. Amasino RM
    (2016) Evolution of VRN2/Ghd7-Like genes in vernalization-mediated repression of grass flowering. Plant Physiol 170: 2124–2135
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  111. ↵
    1. Woods DP,
    2. Ream TS,
    3. Amasino RM
    (2014a) Memory of the vernalized state in plants including the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Front Plant Sci 5: 99
    OpenUrlPubMed
  112. ↵
    1. Woods DP,
    2. Ream TS,
    3. Minevich G,
    4. Hobert O,
    5. Amasino RM
    (2014b) PHYTOCHROME C is an essential light receptor for photoperiodic flowering in the temperate grass, Brachypodium distachyon. Genetics 198: 397–408
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  113. ↵
    1. Wu G,
    2. Poethig RS
    (2006) Temporal regulation of shoot development in Arabidopsis thaliana by miR156 and its target SPL3. Development 133: 3539–3547
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  114. ↵
    1. Xiao J,
    2. Xu S,
    3. Li C,
    4. Xu Y,
    5. Xing L,
    6. Niu Y,
    7. Huan Q,
    8. Tang Y,
    9. Zhao C,
    10. Wagner D, et al.
    (2014) O-GlcNAc-mediated interaction between VER2 and TaGRP2 elicits TaVRN1 mRNA accumulation during vernalization in winter wheat. Nat Commun 5: 4572
    OpenUrlPubMed
  115. ↵
    1. Xie K,
    2. Shen J,
    3. Hou X,
    4. Yao J,
    5. Li X,
    6. Xiao J,
    7. Xiong L
    (2012) Gradual increase of miR156 regulates temporal expression changes of numerous genes during leaf development in rice. Plant Physiol 158: 1382–1394
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  116. ↵
    1. Yan L,
    2. Fu D,
    3. Li C,
    4. Blechl A,
    5. Tranquilli G,
    6. Bonafede M,
    7. Sanchez A,
    8. Valarik M,
    9. Yasuda S,
    10. Dubcovsky J
    (2006) The wheat and barley vernalization gene VRN3 is an orthologue of FT. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 19581–19586
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  117. ↵
    1. Yan L,
    2. Loukoianov A,
    3. Blechl A,
    4. Tranquilli G,
    5. Ramakrishna W,
    6. SanMiguel P,
    7. Bennetzen JL,
    8. Echenique V,
    9. Dubcovsky J
    (2004) The wheat VRN2 gene is a flowering repressor down-regulated by vernalization. Science 303: 1640–1644
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  118. ↵
    1. Yan L,
    2. Loukoianov A,
    3. Tranquilli G,
    4. Helguera M,
    5. Fahima T,
    6. Dubcovsky J
    (2003) Positional cloning of the wheat vernalization gene VRN1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 6263–6268
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  119. ↵
    1. Yoo SK,
    2. Chung KS,
    3. Kim J,
    4. Lee JH,
    5. Hong SM,
    6. Yoo SJ,
    7. Yoo SY,
    8. Lee JS,
    9. Ahn JH
    (2005) CONSTANS activates SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 through FLOWERING LOCUS T to promote flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 139: 770–778
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  120. ↵
    1. Yu S,
    2. Lian H,
    3. Wang J-W
    (2015) Plant developmental transitions: the role of microRNAs and sugars. Curr Opin Plant Biol 27: 1–7
    OpenUrlPubMed
  121. ↵
    1. Zeng L,
    2. Zhang Q,
    3. Sun R,
    4. Kong H,
    5. Zhang N,
    6. Ma H
    (2014) Resolution of deep angiosperm phylogeny using conserved nuclear genes and estimates of early divergence times. Nat Commun 5: 4956
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  122. ↵
    1. Zhou CM,
    2. Zhang TQ,
    3. Wang X,
    4. Yu S,
    5. Lian H,
    6. Tang H,
    7. Feng ZY,
    8. Zozomova-Lihová J,
    9. Wang JW
    (2013) Molecular basis of age-dependent vernalization in Cardamine flexuosa. Science 340: 1097–1100
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Physiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Winter Memory throughout the Plant Kingdom: Different Paths to Flowering
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Physiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Physiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Winter Memory throughout the Plant Kingdom: Different Paths to Flowering
Frédéric Bouché, Daniel P. Woods, Richard M. Amasino
Plant Physiology Jan 2017, 173 (1) 27-35; DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.01322

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Winter Memory throughout the Plant Kingdom: Different Paths to Flowering
Frédéric Bouché, Daniel P. Woods, Richard M. Amasino
Plant Physiology Jan 2017, 173 (1) 27-35; DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.01322
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • THE MEMORY OF WINTER IN ARABIDOPSIS
    • VERNALIZATION IN PERENNIAL BRASSICACEAE
    • VERNALIZATION SYSTEMS IN OTHER EUDICOTS
    • VERNALIZATION SYSTEMS IN MONOCOTS
    • CONCLUDING REMARKS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

Plant Physiology: 173 (1)
Plant Physiology
Vol. 173, Issue 1
Jan 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • How Plants Sense and Respond to Stressful Environments
  • Target of Rapamycin Signaling in Plant Stress Responses
  • Perception of Damaged Self in Plants
Show more UPDATES - FOCUS ISSUE

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Flowering and Reproduction

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Physiology Preview
  • Archive
  • Focus Collections
  • Classic Collections
  • The Plant Cell
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Journal Miles
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire