Skip to main content

Main menu

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Article CommentaryCommentary
You have accessRestricted Access

Live-Cell Imaging of Mobile RNAs in Plants

Leonor C. Boavida
Leonor C. Boavida
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, and Center for Plant Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Leonor C. Boavida
  • For correspondence: lboavida@purdue.edu

Published June 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.00441

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

One of the most exciting findings in the past few decades is the discovery that individual mRNAs and noncoding RNAs can act as long-distance signaling messengers traveling cell to cell to distant sites in the plant. Numerous examples unveiled the involvement of endogenous RNAs as non-cell-autonomous regulators of cell fate, organ patterning, and growth responses to environmental signals; other studies even showed that RNAs could be delivered to the next generation (Bayer et al., 2009; Lu et al., 2012; Jiang et al., 2015; Thieme et al., 2015; Martínez et al., 2016). The selectivity and specificity of long-distance transport of endogenous RNAs have been debated intensively, but recent findings indicate that specific cis-acting elements or “zip codes” in the 5′ or 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of RNAs are required for RNA mobility (Morris, 2017).

Most of our knowledge of cell-to-cell and long-distance transport in plants originates from studies on how plant viruses manipulate host cells to spread via plasmodesmata and phloem (Ham and Lucas, 2017). Yet, we lack critical information on the transport mechanisms of endogenous RNAs from transcription sites to remote destination cells or tissues. Several RNA biosensors have been successfully used to track the subcellular movement of individual mRNAs in other systems (Mannack et al., 2016); however, these techniques have not been widely used in plants (Tilsner, 2015). One of the most common methods relies on aptamer-protein interactions that exploit the high affinity of transacting RNA-binding proteins to RNA cis-acting elements. The technique consists of engineering two separate genetic constructs. The first contains the MS2 bacteriophage coat protein localized to the nucleus by the canonical Simian Virus 40 (SV40) nuclear localization signal (NLS) fused to GFP (MS2SV40-GFP). The second construct contains an array of MS2 RNA-binding sites, a series of stem-loop (SL) repeats (mRNASL24) inserted in the 5′ or 3′ UTR of the mRNA of interest. Coexpression of these two constructs allows a complex to form between the mRNASL24 and MS2SV40-GFP.

One limitation of this system is the cytosolic background of the MS2-GFP probe; this background masks signals that are due to specific RNA binding. In this issue of Plant Physiology, Luo et al. (2018) successfully adapt the MS2-GFP system to plant cells and examine the subcellular targeting of RNAs in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Luo et al. replaced NLSSV40, which is inefficiently targeted to the nucleus in plants, with the endogenous nuclear localization signal of the bZIP transcription factor FD (MS2FD-GFP). With the improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio of this biosensor, the authors tested the specificity of the system by coexpressing MS2FD‐GFP with the endogenous mobile FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) mRNA. They also used a control mRNA that encodes a scorable cytoplasmic marker (RFP). They tagged both constructs with 24 MS2 SL repeats in the 3′ UTR (FTSL24 and RFPSL24). In this setting, both the engineered mRNAs are translocated to the cytoplasm, but only the functional FTSL24-MS2FD-GFP is then actively transported along a Golgi-associated pathway to plasmodesmata (Fig. 1). Although not addressed directly, intrinsic localization elements should be involved in conferring mobility to the FT mRNA, subcellular sorting to plasmodesmata and facilitating cell-to-cell transport. These results agree with the idea that plant viruses use the endogenous plant cellular macromolecule machinery for intracellular and intercellular transport.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Coexpression of FTSL24 mRNA with MS2FD-GFP allows live-cell imaging of subcellular trafficking and selective targeting of the fluorescent-labeled FTSL24 mRNA-MS2FD-GFP complex to plasmodesmata. Colocalization of the FTSL24 mRNA-MS2FD-GFP complex with aniline blue fluorophore-stained plasmodesmata. (From Luo et al. [2018], Fig. 3, J–L.)

RNA imaging techniques like those presented by Luo et al. (2018) are essential research tools that enable one to examine RNA dynamics in cells in real time. The MS2-GFP system has been the method of choice for quantification of transcription dynamics or examination of subcellular mRNA distribution, which is particularly important in polarized cells, such as pollen tubes or zygotes, to sort polarity or cell fate determinants to specific regions in the cell. Setting the ground for a greater challenge, the fast and extremely stable binding of MS2 to the SL repeats seems well suited for visualization of intercellular and long-distance RNA transport in plants. It remains to be seen if this MS2-GFP system can monitor the subcellular details of RNA trafficking in real time for a wide variety of mobile RNAs. Hopefully, as the research community adopts this useful research tool, those answers will come.

Footnotes

  • www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.18.00441

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Bayer M,
    2. Nawy T,
    3. Giglione C,
    4. Galli M,
    5. Meinnel T,
    6. Lukowitz W
    (2009) Paternal control of embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 323: 1485–1488
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Ham BK,
    2. Lucas WJ
    (2017) Phloem-mobile RNAs as systemic signaling agents. Annu Rev Plant Biol 68: 173–195
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Jiang H,
    2. Yi J,
    3. Boavida LC,
    4. Chen Y,
    5. Becker JD,
    6. Köhler C,
    7. McCormick S
    (2015) Intercellular communication in Arabidopsis thaliana pollen discovered via AHG3 transcript movement from the vegetative cell to sperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 13378–13383
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Lu KJ,
    2. Huang NC,
    3. Liu YS,
    4. Lu CA,
    5. Yu TS
    (2012) Long-distance movement of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T RNA participates in systemic floral regulation. RNA Biol 9: 653–662
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Luo K-R,
    2. Huang N-C,
    3. Yu T-S
    (2018) Selective targeting of mobile mRNAs to plasmodesmata for cell-to-cell movement. Plant Physiol 177: pp.00107.2018
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Mannack LV,
    2. Eising S,
    3. Rentmeister A
    (2016) Current techniques for visualizing RNA in cells. F1000Res 5: 775
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Martínez G,
    2. Panda K,
    3. Köhler C,
    4. Slotkin RK
    (2016) Silencing in sperm cells is directed by RNA movement from the surrounding nurse cell. Nat Plants 2: 16030
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Morris RJ
    (2017) On the selectivity, specificity and signalling potential of the long-distance movement of messenger RNA. Curr Opin Plant Biol 43: 1–7
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Thieme CJ,
    2. Rojas-Triana M,
    3. Stecyk E,
    4. Schudoma C,
    5. Zhang W,
    6. Yang L,
    7. Miñambres M,
    8. Walther D,
    9. Schulze WX,
    10. Paz-Ares J,
    11. Scheible WR,
    12. Kragler F
    (2015) Endogenous Arabidopsis messenger RNAs transported to distant tissues. Nat Plants 1: 15025
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Tilsner J
    (2015) Techniques for RNA in vivo imaging in plants. J Microsc 258: 1–5
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Physiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Live-Cell Imaging of Mobile RNAs in Plants
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Physiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Physiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Live-Cell Imaging of Mobile RNAs in Plants
Leonor C. Boavida
Plant Physiology Jun 2018, 177 (2) 441-442; DOI: 10.1104/pp.18.00441

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Live-Cell Imaging of Mobile RNAs in Plants
Leonor C. Boavida
Plant Physiology Jun 2018, 177 (2) 441-442; DOI: 10.1104/pp.18.00441
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

Plant Physiology: 177 (2)
Plant Physiology
Vol. 177, Issue 2
Jun 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • Polycomb Group Transcriptional Repressor: Suppress to Sustain
  • Stress Management: OsIDS1 Modulates Histone Deacetylation to Repress Salt Tolerance Genes
  • Identification of Woodland Strawberry Gene Coexpression Networks
Show more COMMENTARIES

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Physiology Preview
  • Archive
  • Focus Collections
  • Classic Collections
  • The Plant Cell
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Journal Miles
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire