Skip to main content

Main menu

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleArticles
Open Access

A Trihelix Family Transcription Factor Is Associated with Key Genes in Mixed-Linkage Glucan Accumulation

Mingzhu Fan, Klaus Herburger, Jacob K. Jensen, Starla Zemelis-Durfee, Federica Brandizzi, Stephen C. Fry, Curtis G. Wilkerson
Mingzhu Fan
aDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
bGreat Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mingzhu Fan
Klaus Herburger
cThe Edinburgh Cell Wall Group, Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King’s Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacob K. Jensen
aDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
bGreat Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
dØster Søgade 36, 1357 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jacob K. Jensen
Starla Zemelis-Durfee
bGreat Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
eMSU-DOE Plant Research Lab, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Federica Brandizzi
bGreat Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
eMSU-DOE Plant Research Lab, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Federica Brandizzi
Stephen C. Fry
cThe Edinburgh Cell Wall Group, Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King’s Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephen C. Fry
Curtis G. Wilkerson
aDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
bGreat Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
fDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Curtis G. Wilkerson
  • For correspondence: wilker13@msu.edu

Published November 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.00978

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Gus expression driven by the 3.5-kb upstream region of BdTHX1 and MLG content in different B. distachyon tissues. A, GUS staining of 5-d-old pBdTHX1::GUS T1 seedling. B to F, GUS staining of elongating leaf (B), mature leaf (C), elongating internode (D), elongated internode (E), and 10 d-after-fertilization (DAF) endosperm (F) of pBdTHX1::GUS T1 plant. Scale bars, 5 mm. G, MLG amounts in various B. distachyon tissues are shown as means ± sd from three biological replicates. Alcohol-insoluble residue (AIR) extracted from seedlings and different tissues of Bd21-3 plant were subjected to MLG assay.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Immunolabeling and expression of BdCSLF6 and BdTHX1 in leaf. A, Immunolabeling of elongating leaf and leaf sheath with MLG monoclonal antibody. B and C, RNA in situ hybridization of BdCSLF6 (B) and BdTHX1 (C) in elongating leaf and leaf sheath. Sections hybridized with sense probes are shown as controls. The arrowheads indicate the vascular bundle. P, Parenchyma cells; ls, leaf sheath; el, elongating leaf. Scale bars, 100 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Binding of BdTHX1 to BdCSLF6 intron sequences. A, ChIP-seq profile for BdCSLF6 using BdTHX1 antibody and schematic diagram of the probes used in electrophoretic mobility-shift assays. The ChIP-seq reads were mapped to B. distachyon Bd21 v1.0 chromosome 3: 14473859 to 14474805, corresponding to the second intron of BdCSLF6. y axis shows normalized read counts. The exons and introns of BdCSLF6 were shown as rectangles (filled, translated regions; open, untranslated regions) and black lines, respectively. Preimmune serum was used as a negative control. The sequences that correspond to the two peaks are shown, and GT motifs are highlighted in bold. F1 is a 272-bp-long probe located in the second intron of BdCSLF6. Probe F5 is 60 bp long. Probes F6, F7, F8, and F9 are 30 bp long. The black dots on the gray lines represent the binding site. B and C, EMSA was performed with biotin-labeled probes and wheat germ cell-free synthesized BdTHX1. Two different amounts of BdTHX1 were used to test if the binding is BdTHX1 amount dependent. ++ represents that 4-fold excess amount of protein was added in the reaction. Free DNA and protein-DNA complex were separated by 5% TBE polyacrylamide gels. B, The binding of BdTHX1 to probe F1. Wheat germ cell-free synthesized protein DHFR was used as negative control. C, The specific binding of BdTHX1 to probe F5 was tested by using a competition assay. Excess amounts of unlabeled DNA fragments (200-fold molar excess over labeled DNA) were included in the assay as competitors.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Analysis of BdTHX1 binding site. A and B, BdTHX1 binding site was analyzed by using mutant competitors in EMSA. The sequences of mutant competitors used in EMSA (B) are shown in A. A, The binding motif is highlighted in bold, and the mutated nucleotide of each competitor is lowercased. B, EMSA was performed with biotin-labeled probe F5 and wheat germ cell-free synthesized BdTHX1. Free DNA and protein-DNA complex were separated by 5% TBE polyacrylamide gels. Excess amounts of unlabeled probes F5, M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7, M8, and M9 (200-fold molar excess over labeled DNA) were included as competitors. C, The motif created using program MEME motif analysis of the top 100 peaks by IDR score of ChIP-seq data. The height the label of each residues represents its frequency at that position. The GT-motif nucleotides are underlined.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Binding of BdTHX1 to the 3′ proximal region of BdXTH8. A, ChIP-seq profile for BdXTH8 using BdTHX1 antibody and schematic diagram of the probes used in EMSA. The ChIP-seq reads were mapped to B. distachyon Bd21 v1.0 chromosome 3: 17133890 to 17134728, corresponding to the 3′ proximal region of BdXTH8. y axis shows normalized read counts. The exons and introns of BdXTH8 are shown as rectangles (filled, translated regions; open, untranslated regions) and black lines, respectively. Dashed lines represents upstream and downstream sequences. X1 is a 328-bp sequence located downstream of BdXTH8. X2 to X7 vary between 57 and 60 bp long. The black dots on the gray lines represent the binding site. B, EMSA was performed with biotin-labeled probe X1 and wheat germ cell-free synthesized BdTHX1. Free DNA and protein-DNA complex were separated by 5% TBE polyacrylamide gels. Excess amounts of unlabeled X1 (200-fold molar excess over labeled X1) were included as specific competitor. Two different amounts of BdTHX1 were used. ++ represents that 4-fold excess amount of protein was added in the reaction. C, Probe sequence for X4, X5, X6, and X7. Both X4 and X5 contain part of GT motif. The binding motif in X7 is highlight in bold. D, Verification of binding motif using labeled probes from different regions of X1. BdTHX1 binds to X7, which probe contains a typical GT motif.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Activities of Pichia expressed BdXTH8. A, XET, MXE, and CXE (WSCA) activities were measured using soluble donor substrates (xyloglucan, MLG, or water-soluble cellulose acetate; WSCA); CXE (AP) activity was assayed using insoluble alkali-treated filter paper (AP) as a donor. [3H]XXXGol served as acceptor. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.01, ANOVA + Tukey’s post-hoc test) among activities after 24 h or 36 h incubation are indicated by lower- or uppercase letters, respectively. B, pH dependence of XET and MXE activity expressed as % of pH optima. Activities are shown as means ± sd from four (A) or three (B) independent experiments.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Phenotype of pZmUbi::BdTHX1 transgenic shoots. A to D, Transgenic shoots of control (A) and pZmUbi::BdTHX1 (B) regenerated on shoot-regeneration medium. After 4 days (control) or 7 days (pZmUbi::BdTHX1), shoots of control plants continued to grow (C), but the transgenic shoots of pZmUbi::THX1 stopped growing and died (D). Scale bar, 2 mm. E and F, Cross sections of control (E) and pZmUbi::BdTHX1 (F) shoots stained with toluidine blue. The arrowheads indicate the vascular bundle. P, parenchyma cells. Scale bar, 50 μm. G to I, Transmission electron microscopy of control (G) and pZmUbi::BdTHX1 shoots (H and I). The circle in orange indicates the area of vascular bundle. xy, Xylem; ph, phloem; P, parenchyma cells. Scale bar, 10 μm. J, Average cell size of control and pZmUbi::BdTHX1 were shown as means ± sd from different transgenic shoots (n = 3). **P < 0.01 compared with control (unpaired t test). K and L, Cell number (K) and average cell size (L) of cells in vascular bundle of control and pZmUbi::BdTHX1 transgenic shoots were shown as means ± sd (n = 3). **P < 0.01 compared with control (unpaired t test).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Supplemental Figures, Tables, and Methods

    • Supplemental Data -

      Supplemental Figures 1-14, Supplemental Tables 2-4 and Supplemental Methods

    • Supplemental Data -

      Supplemental Table 1

PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Physiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Trihelix Family Transcription Factor Is Associated with Key Genes in Mixed-Linkage Glucan Accumulation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Physiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Physiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A Trihelix Family Transcription Factor Is Associated with Key Genes in Mixed-Linkage Glucan Accumulation
Mingzhu Fan, Klaus Herburger, Jacob K. Jensen, Starla Zemelis-Durfee, Federica Brandizzi, Stephen C. Fry, Curtis G. Wilkerson
Plant Physiology Nov 2018, 178 (3) 1207-1221; DOI: 10.1104/pp.18.00978

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
A Trihelix Family Transcription Factor Is Associated with Key Genes in Mixed-Linkage Glucan Accumulation
Mingzhu Fan, Klaus Herburger, Jacob K. Jensen, Starla Zemelis-Durfee, Federica Brandizzi, Stephen C. Fry, Curtis G. Wilkerson
Plant Physiology Nov 2018, 178 (3) 1207-1221; DOI: 10.1104/pp.18.00978
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Extras

  • First author profile: Mingzhu Fan

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

Plant Physiology: 178 (3)
Plant Physiology
Vol. 178, Issue 3
Nov 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Developmental Programming of Thermonastic Leaf Movement
  • BRASSINOSTEROID-SIGNALING KINASE5 Associates with Immune Receptors and Is Required for Immune Responses
  • Deetiolation Enhances Phototropism by Modulating NON-PHOTOTROPIC HYPOCOTYL3 Phosphorylation Status
Show more Articles

GENES, DEVELOPMENT AND EVOLUTION

  • FAD2 Gene Radiation and Positive Selection Contributed to Polyacetylene Metabolism Evolution in Campanulids
  • Dek40 Encodes a PBAC4 Protein Required for 20S Proteasome Biogenesis and Seed Development
  • CENTRORADIALIS Interacts with FLOWERING LOCUS T-Like Genes to Control Floret Development and Grain Number
Show more GENES, DEVELOPMENT AND EVOLUTION

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Physiology Preview
  • Archive
  • Focus Collections
  • Classic Collections
  • The Plant Cell
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Journal Miles
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire