Skip to main content

Main menu

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleResearch Article
Open Access

Medicago TERPENE SYNTHASE 10 Is Involved in Defense Against an Oomycete Root Pathogen

Heena Yadav, Dorothée Dreher, Benedikt Athmer, Andrea Porzel, Aleksandr Gavrin, Susanne Baldermann, Alain Tissier, Bettina Hause
Heena Yadav
aDepartment of Cell and Metabolic Biology, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, D-06120 Halle, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Heena Yadav
Dorothée Dreher
aDepartment of Cell and Metabolic Biology, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, D-06120 Halle, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benedikt Athmer
aDepartment of Cell and Metabolic Biology, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, D-06120 Halle, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Benedikt Athmer
Andrea Porzel
bDepartment of Bioorganic Chemistry, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, D-06120 Halle, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrea Porzel
Aleksandr Gavrin
cSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1LR, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aleksandr Gavrin
Susanne Baldermann
dInstitute of Nutritional Science, University of Potsdam, D-14558 Nuthetal, Potsdam, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alain Tissier
aDepartment of Cell and Metabolic Biology, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, D-06120 Halle, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alain Tissier
Bettina Hause
aDepartment of Cell and Metabolic Biology, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, D-06120 Halle, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Bettina Hause
  • For correspondence: bettina.hause@ipb-halle.de

Published July 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.00278

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Comparative analysis of transcript accumulation in M. truncatula roots after treatment with A. euteiches zoospores for 2 h. A, Venn diagram showing the numbers of differentially expressed genes. Total RNA isolated from the roots of 1-week-old seedlings (blue) and 6-week-old plants (green) nontreated or treated with A. euteiches zoospores was subjected to transcript profiling using the Affymetrix M. truncatula GeneChip array. Numbers of significantly upregulated (red) and downregulated (green) genes in A. euteiches-treated roots in comparison to nontreated roots are shown (P ≤ 0.01, n = 3). B. Enriched GO molecular function terms (P < 0.05) associated with the core sets of differentially regulated genes in the treatment of seedlings and adult plants are shown with –log10 transformed P-values indicated on x axes (full data in Supplemental Dataset S1). The GO function “terpene synthase activity” is outlined in red. FMN, Flavin mono nucleotide.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Induction of MtTPS10 expression in M. truncatula roots by treatment with A. euteiches zoospores. Roots of 1-week-old seedlings (A and C) and 6-week-old plants (B) were treated with A. euteiches zoospores (Ae) or mock-treated with swamp-water (mock). MtTPS10 transcript levels were determined by RT-qPCR at 2 hpi (A and B) or at time points as indicated (C). Data are shown as the mean ± se. His-3-like was used as a reference gene and statistical analysis was done using Student’s t test (n ≥ 3 independent samples); *P < 0.05. n.s., not significant.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Expression of MtTPS10 is specifically induced by infection with oomycetes and is restricted to roots. (A) MtTPS10 transcript accumulation in 1-week-old Medicago A17 seedlings inoculated with A. euteiches zoospores (Ae), A. euteiches zoospores boiled for 10 min (dead Ae), and P. palmivora zoospores (Pp) for 2 h. Controls were treated with water (mock). B, MtTPS10 transcript accumulation was studied in 1-week-old M. truncatula A17 seedlings inoculated with spores of R. irregularis (Ri), spores of R. irregularis boiled for 10 min (dead Ri), and spores of C. trifolii (Ci), and in 1-week-old seedling roots treated with 100 mm NaCl or 50 µm MeJA or wounded by squeezing. All samples were analyzed 2 h after treatment. Control plants were either mock-treated, treated with Tween20, or left unwounded. C, Two-week-old M. truncatula A17 plants were infected with A. euteiches for 4 weeks and MtTPS10 transcript accumulation was analyzed in shoots and roots by RT-qPCR. Note that MtTPS10 transcripts were barely detected in leaves of either noninfected or infected plants. Data in A to C are shown as the mean ± se. His-3 like was used as the reference gene and statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test (n = 3); lowercase letters a and b indicate significantly different values (P < 0.05). D to F, MtTPS10 is induced in all root cells after infection by A. euteiches. A 2-kb region of the MtTPS10 promoter fused to the GUS-encoding gene was transformed in M. truncatula roots via A. rhizogenes-mediated root transformation. Transformed roots were then treated with A. euteiches zoospores for 2 hpi and 24 hpi; controls were not treated. After treatment, roots were stained with X-Gluc and embedded in PEG for sectioning. Pictures were taken from roots (D), root tips (E), and cross sections of 10 µm thickness (F). Bars represent 100 µm (D and E) and 50 µm (F).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    MtTPS10 is a cytosolic protein and produces a blend of sesquiterpenes. A, N. benthamiana protoplasts were transformed with the MtTPS10 encoding sequence fused to mCherry. Fluorescence images were taken using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Note the localization of MtTPS10 (green) within the cytosol surrounding the chloroplasts visible by chlorophyll autofluorescence (red). Scale bars = 10 µm. B, Products of MtTPS10 identified after heterologous expression in S. cerevisiae are shown. MtTPS10 was expressed together with FPPS and HMGCR (tHMGCR) and the resulting products were analyzed using liquid-injection GC-MS (black line). Yeast cells expressing FPPS and HMGCR alone served as the control (pink line). C, Products of MtTPS10 identified after heterologous expression in S. cerevisiae and N. benthamiana leaves are shown. MtTPS10 was expressed together with FPPS and HMGCR. Yeast cultures and infiltrated leaves were analyzed using SPME-coupled GC-MS. Note that in B and C, several sesquiterpenes and sesquiterpene alcohols occurred upon expression of MtTPS10 and could be annotated by comparison of MS spectra based on library suggestions: (1) longipenene, (2) ylangene, (3) longicyclene, (5) farnesene, (6) α-himachalene (9) alloaromadendrene, (10) β-himachalene, (11) bisabolene, (12) himachalol, (13) α-bisabolol, and (14) shyobunol (D) The main product (peak 12) was purified, subjected to NMR analysis and identified as himachalol (Supplemental Fig. S2; Supplemental Table S1).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    The Tnt1 insertion line NF10408 is defective in MtTPS10 expression, fails to produce sesquiterpene volatiles, and shows enhanced susceptibility to infection with A. euteiches. A, One-week-old seedlings of BG and tps10 lines were treated with A. euteiches zoospores for 2 h. Total RNA from roots was subjected to RT-qPCR. Transcript levels of MtTPS10 determined using primers binding upstream of the Tnt1 insertion site (see Supplemental Fig. S5A) were significantly reduced in roots of tps10 mutant plants compared to BG plants. Data are shown as the mean ± se. Actin was used as the reference gene and statistical analysis was done using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test (n = 3 independent samples); lowercase letters a and b indicate significantly different values (P < 0.05). B, Volatiles produced by roots of BG and tps10 mutant plants with and without infection by A. euteiches. Volatile compounds induced during the first 12 h after treatment with zoospores were adsorbed on PDMS strips and analyzed by thermal desorption-GC-MS. The labeled peaks correspond to (1) longipenene, (2) ylangene, (3) longicyclene, (4) longifolene, (7) isoshyobunone, (8) 7-epi-cis-sesquisabinene hydrate, (9) alloaromadendrene, (10) β-himachalene, (15) nerolidol, (16) fokienol, (17) ethyl iso-allocholate, (18) cholest-8-en-3-β-ol acetate, (19) cyclononasiloxane, (20) thunbergol, (21) nerolidyl propionate, and (22) heptasiloxane. The compounds representing peaks 1 to 3 and 9 and 10 were also identified in extracts from yeast expressing MtTPS10. Note that the major compound identified in yeast (himachalol [peak 12 in Fig. 4B]) is not detectable among root volatiles, possibly because of M. truncatularoot modification. C and D, Biomass of shoots (C) and roots (D) of BG and tps10 plants noninfected or infected by A. euteiches, as shown in C. tps10 mutant plants were strongly affected by infection with A. euteiches as visible by the diminished biomass of shoots and roots, whereas plants of the BG line did not show significant alterations in growth. Data are shown as the mean ± se (n = 18 independent samples). Statistical analysis was done using Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test; ***P < 0.001; *P < 0.05. E and F, Two-week-old seedlings of BG and tps10 mutant lines were infected with A. euteiches zoospores and harvested 4 weeks later. Total RNA from roots was subjected to RT-qPCR. Transcript levels of MtTPS10 (E) were significantly reduced in roots of tps10 mutant plants compared to BG plants, whereas 5.8S rRNA of A. euteiches was strongly enhanced in tps10 roots in comparison to BG roots (F). Data are shown as the mean ± se. Actin was used as the reference gene and statistical analysis was done using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test (n = 3 independent samples); *P < 0.05.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Expression of amiR targeting MtTPS10 (TPS10-amiR) reduced MtTPS10 expression and enhanced susceptibility to A. euteiches. M. truncatula cv R108 plants were transformed with an empty vector (EV) or a TPS10-amiR (tps) construct using A. rhizogenes-mediated root transformation and were subsequently infected with A. euteiches for 4 weeks. MtTPS10 transcript accumulation (A) and 5.8S rRNA of A. euteiches (B) were determined using RT-qPCR. Actin was used as the reference gene. Data from single transformed roots are shown. The red bars show the mean ± se for all four plants. Statistical analysis was performed using Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Products of MtTPS10 inhibit mycelial growth of A. euteiches. A, A. euteiches mycelial pieces were placed on plates and different amounts of the yeast extract containing MtTPS10 products (given in nmol himachalol per plate) were added at the edges of plates. Application of solvent only (pentane) or extracts from yeasts expressing the empty vector (EV) served as controls. After 1 week of mycelial growth, photographs were taken (Supplemental Fig. S4) and areas covered by mycelium were calculated using ImageJ. Data are shown as the mean ± se (n = 3 independent samples). Different letters indicate significant differences according to one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test, P < 0.05. B, Zoospores of A. euteiches were incubated for 1 h with different concentrations of yeast extract containing MtTPS10 products (himachalol plus some minor compounds) followed by plating on agar to allow germination. Pictures were taken 24 h later. Incubation with extracts from yeast expressing the empty-vector (EV) construct served as the control. Note the diminished hyphal growth at 250 µm himachalol and the complete inhibition of zoospore germination at 500 µm himachalol in the medium. Scale bar = 1 mm for all micrographs.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Supplemental Figures, Tables, and Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data - Supplemental Figures 1-7 and Supplemental Tables 1-4
    • Supplemental Data - Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Physiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Medicago TERPENE SYNTHASE 10 Is Involved in Defense Against an Oomycete Root Pathogen
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Physiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Physiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Medicago TERPENE SYNTHASE 10 Is Involved in Defense Against an Oomycete Root Pathogen
Heena Yadav, Dorothée Dreher, Benedikt Athmer, Andrea Porzel, Aleksandr Gavrin, Susanne Baldermann, Alain Tissier, Bettina Hause
Plant Physiology Jul 2019, 180 (3) 1598-1613; DOI: 10.1104/pp.19.00278

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Medicago TERPENE SYNTHASE 10 Is Involved in Defense Against an Oomycete Root Pathogen
Heena Yadav, Dorothée Dreher, Benedikt Athmer, Andrea Porzel, Aleksandr Gavrin, Susanne Baldermann, Alain Tissier, Bettina Hause
Plant Physiology Jul 2019, 180 (3) 1598-1613; DOI: 10.1104/pp.19.00278
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Extras

  • First author profile: Heena Yadav

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

Plant Physiology: 180 (3)
Plant Physiology
Vol. 180, Issue 3
Jul 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • SlFERL Interacts with S-Adenosylmethionine Synthetase to Regulate Fruit Ripening
  • Increased Cuticle Permeability Caused by a New Allele of ACETYL-COA CARBOXYLASE1 Enhances CO2 Uptake
  • The Microtubule-Associated Protein CLASP Is Translationally Regulated in Light-Dependent Root Apical Meristem Growth
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Physiology Preview
  • Archive
  • Focus Collections
  • Classic Collections
  • The Plant Cell
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Journal Miles
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire