Table II.

Trichome branch numbers

LineAverage No. of Trichome Branches in Percentages per Leafanb
1234
Landsberg erecta ecotype0.0 ± 0.00.5 ± 1.495.2 ± 10.34.3 ± 10.320/402
Columbia ecotype0.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.093.2 ± 4.46.8 ± 4.420/507
ProGL2:YFP:ICK1/KRP1 (#1 and #2)cef18.4 ± 7.465.6 ± 9.016.0 ± 6.30.0 ± 0.018/484
18.0 ± 9.864.8 ± 9.517.2 ± 7.20.0 ± 0.020/521
ProGL2:YFP:ICK1/KRP1K84/86A (#1 and #2)cef5.7 ± 4.352.4 ± 11.041.9 ± 9.70.0 ± 0.019/453
4.7 ± 5.950.1 ± 10.945.2 ± 14.00.0 ± 0.017/327
ProGL2:YFP:ICK1/KRP1109–191 (#1 and #2)d15.5 ± 6.665.3 ± 8.819.2 ± 7.70.0 ± 0.020/392
10.0 ± 7.558.1 ± 12.431.9 ± 11.70.0 ± 0.019/407
ProGL2:GUS:YFP:ICK1/KRP1109–191 (#1 and #2)d23.8 ± 7.461.8 ± 10.814.4 ± 7.20.0 ± 0.020/330
12.2 ± 7.060.7 ± 9.627.1 ± 10.50.0 ± 0.020/428
ProGL2:YFP:ICK1/KRP11–108d0.0 ± 0.01.4 ± 2.797.0 ± 4.81.6 ± 3.819/438
ProGL2:NLS:GFP:GUSd0.0 ± 0.03.3 ± 4.496.5 ± 4.70.2 ± 0.920/335
ProGL2:ICK1/KRP1d14.1 ± 9.459.7 ± 11.026.2 ± 14.10.0 ± 0.018/168
ProGL2:ICK1/KRP1109–191d12.6 ± 11.864.5 ± 15.222.9 ± 10.90.0 ± 0.020/161
ProGL2:YFP:ICK1/KRP11–108 ×ProGL2:ICK1/KRP1d0.0 ± 0.08.1 ± 5.891.9 ± 5.80.0 ± 0.020/406
ProGL2:NLS:GFP:GUS ×ProGL2:ICK1/KRP1d0.3 ± 1.516.8 ± 7.482.9 ± 7.90.0 ± 0.018/293
ProGL2:YFP:ICK1/KRP11–108 × ProGL2:ICK1/KRP1109–191d1.7 ± 2.953.3 ± 12.145.0 ± 12.10.0 ± 0.020/385
ProGL2:NLS:GFP:GUS ×ProGL2:ICK1/KRP1109–191d3.1 ± 4.456.6 ± 9.240.3 ± 10.80.0 ± 0.020/315
  • a All trichomes on rosette leaf numbers 3 and 4 were counted from at least 10 plants per line, the average ± sd is given, the branch number with the highest percentage is shown in bold.

  • b Total numbers of counted leaves/trichomes.

  • c In Columbia-0 accession.

  • d In Landsberg erecta accession.

  • e χ2 tests for ProGL2:YFP:ICK1/KRP1 line 1 and ProGL2:YFP:ICK1/KRP1K84/86A line 1 or line 2 retrieved χ2 numbers of 89.512 and 96.272, respectively; with this both genotypes are significantly different, P ≤ 0.001.

  • f χ2 tests for ProGL2:YFP:ICK1/KRP1 line 2 and ProGL2:YFP:ICK1/KRP1K84/86A line 1 or line 2 retrieved χ2 numbers of 90.549 and 96.781, respectively; with this both genotypes are significantly different, P ≤ 0.001.