Skip to main content

Main menu

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Physiology
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Plant Cell Teaching Tools
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Physiology

Advanced Search

  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
    • Focus Collections
    • Classics Collection
    • Upcoming Focus Issues
  • Advertisers
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow plantphysiol on Twitter
  • Visit plantphysiol on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
OtherSCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE

Tools to Study Plant Organelle Biogenesis. Point Mutation Lines with Disrupted Vacuoles and High-Speed Confocal Screening of Green Fluorescent Protein-Tagged Organelles

Emily L. Avila, Jan Zouhar, April E. Agee, David G. Carter, S. Narasimha Chary and Natasha V. Raikhel
Plant Physiology December 2003, 133 (4) 1673-1676; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.033092
Emily L. Avila
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Zouhar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
April E. Agee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David G. Carter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Narasimha Chary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natasha V. Raikhel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • © 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists

We have focused our studies in the past several years on understanding protein trafficking from the secretory system to the vacuole—an organelle present in all plant cells. Here, we report an approach for generating and screening plants with defects in vacuolar biogenesis. Plant vacuoles are commonly known to be multifunctional organelles, and recent findings have even demonstrated a variety of new roles for vacuoles and the vesicles that deliver cargo to them. Although it has always been assumed that vacuoles are essential for plant survival, the recent isolation of a T-DNA-tagged mutant called vcl1 (vacuoleless1) has unequivocally demonstrated that vacuoles are vital organelles (Rojo et al., 2001). Mutations in the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) ortholog of VCL1, VPS16, also block vacuole biogenesis and affect all known vacuolar protein transport pathways in yeast; however, in contrast to VCL1, the VPS16 gene product is not essential (Horazdovsky and Emr, 1993). A major effect of VCL1 inactivation is that it blocks the formation of vacuoles, leading to embryonic lethality. Thus, although the isolation of vcl1 served to emphasize the importance of plant vacuoles to plant growth and development, it is difficult to gain additional information about vacuole biogenesis from an embryo lethal mutant. Some important proteins that likely mediate trafficking to the vacuole are represented by single genes in the Arabidopsis genome. For example, each of the six members of the AtC-VPS complex for which VACUOLELESS1 is a member is encoded by a single gene (Rojo et al., 2003); thus, null mutations in these genes would also most likely be lethal.

Similar conclusions were drawn when several knockout mutants from the SNARE family were isolated. Although a T-DNA insertion into the SYP61/OSM1 syntaxin is viable (Zhu et al., 2002), some reported null mutations of syntaxin genes are not tolerated by the plant. For example, a T-DNA disruption of a single member of the SYP2 and SYP4 gene families is gametophytic lethal (Sanderfoot et al., 2001). Another knockout mutant, “knolle” (syp111), is embryo/seedling lethal (Lukowitz et al., 1996). However, a point mutation in the SYP22/SGR3 gene is viable, and the mutant lacks the shoot gravitropic response (Yano et al., 2003). Thus, it becomes apparent that the isolation of plants with point mutations would be a very valuable tool to isolate viable mutants for studying plant vacuolar biogenesis. With this in mind, we wanted to identify mutants with small defects in vacuolar biogenesis genes that at the same time would not be lethal to the plant.

To allow for effective visualization of vacuolar structure, we chose Arabidopsis lines expressing a fluorescent tonoplast marker, green fluorescent protein (GFP):δ-tonoplast intrinsic protein (TIP), under the control of the 35S promoter (Cutler et al., 2000). The tonoplast-localized GFP fusion protein in the tonoplast of these plants is easily visualized by confocal microscopy (Fig. 1, A–D). Homozygous seeds from 35S::GFP:δ-TIP plants were obtained, and vacuoles from these plants were isolated using the technique described previously by Ahmed et al. (2000). Proper GFP:δ-TIP localization at the tonoplast was confirmed by microscopy (Fig. 1E). Seeds from homozygous plants were then treated with ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) to induce 1-bp changes throughout the genome of this line of plants. The Meridian Insight Point Confocal Microscope (Meridian, Okemos, MI) was used to screen 7-d-old seedlings from the M2 generation for broken or malformed vacuoles, mistargeting of the GFP:δ-TIP chimeric protein, or other interesting phenotypes. The Meridian Insight Confocal has real-time ocular viewing confocal capability that allowed us to rapidly screen large numbers of seedlings. For each seedling, three types of tissues were examined: cotyledons, hypocotyls, and roots (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

GFP:δ-TIP is expressed in the tonoplast of 35S::GFP:δ-TIP transgenic seedlings (A) such as cotyledon epidermal cells (B), hypocotyls (C), and roots (D). E, Example of an isolated vacuole stained with neutral red (top) and with GFP fluorescence (bottom). Scale bar = 40 μm.

Thus far, we have screened 9,175 M2 EMS seedlings (56 pools; approximately 160 seedlings per pool) using confocal microscopy. Seedlings (620; 7%) showed mutations in pigment development, indicating that mutagenesis and the screening protocol were robust (Lightner and Caspar, 1998). Originally, 211 putative mutants with defects in vacuole biogenesis were obtained; however, 110 died before setting seed and/or did not produce any seed (Fig. 2, I–L), resulting in our current population of 101 putative vacuolar mutants. These mutants have been sorted into four broad categories based on their subcellular phenotypes in the M2 generation.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Examples of vacuolar mutants identified. bub mutants have increased numbers of vesicles in the cotyledons (A), hypocotyls (B), or roots (C). Examples of agg mutants with aggregates in the cotyledons (D) and hypocotyls (E). A closer look at the aggregates (F) reveals a membrane-bound vesicular structure. G, Example of the tvs mutant class with increased transvacuolar strands. Some of the mutants had complex phenotypes, such as disruption of cell shape (H). I to L, Many interesting M2 vacuolar mutants that did not survive to the M3 generation. Images A to G were collected by a Leica TCS SP2/UV Confocal Microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Images H to L were collected on a Meridian Insight Point Confocal Microscope with a CCD-cooled camera. Scale bar = 40 μm.

The first category of mutants (bub [bubble-bath]) is characterized by increased numbers of small vacuolar vesicles in the cell (Fig. 2, A–C). Forty-six plants fell into this category. Among these plants, the bub phenotype was observed either in roots (three plants), in cotyledons (29 plants), or in hypocotyls and cotyledons (six plants). Although bub plants appear to have a large, central vacuole, they also have increased numbers of vesicles decorated with GFP:δ-TIP relative to the parental line. The severity of the phenotype correlated with plant lethality because plants with the highly pronounced bub phenotype did not survive (Fig. 2, I–K) or did not produce seeds. The second category of mutants contained large aggregates of GFP fluorescence (agg; Fig. 2, D–F). Thirty-four plants fit into this category. Among these plants, the agg phenotype was observed either in roots (14 plants), in hypocotyls (nine plants), in cotyledons (one plant), in hypocotyl and cotyledons (one plant), or in hypocotyls and roots (one plant). Upon closer examination of M3 agg plants, we observed that some of the aggregates are membrane-bound compartments containing clusters of vesicles (Fig. 2F). The third category contained mutants that showed vacuoles apparently transected by transvacuolar strands (tvs; eight plants; Fig. 2, G and L). Among these plants, the tvs phenotype was observed either in roots (three plants), in cotyledons (two plants), in hypocotyl (one plant), in hypocotyl and cotyledons (one plant), or in hypocotyls and roots (one plant). Further investigation of the M3 generation of tvs plants revealed that their vacuoles were extremely dynamic with the continuous rearrangement of the transvacuolar strands. Additional mutants appear to have unique and more complex phenotypes (Fig. 2H). Thirteen viable M2 plants were clustered into this category. The unique phenotypes included defects in the regular pattern of the cotyledon epidermal cells (seven plants). Interestingly, approximately one-half of seedling-lethal mutants (60 plants; Fig. 2, I–L) showed complex or unique phenotypes throughout the seedling.

Because genetic mapping of these mutants will involve large numbers of F2 seedlings, we are working toward developing a high-throughput screening process. We are now using an Atto Pathway HT high-throughput confocal microscope system (Atto Bioscience, Rockville, MD) with culture plates of our own design for germinating and growing seedlings (Fig. 3). All tissues are screened manually or by an advanced automated imaging routine without damaging the seedlings (Fig. 3, C and D). An example of the wild-type and mutant (bub) images produced by the Atto Pathway microscope can be accessed in supplemental data, available in the online version of this article at http://www.plantphysiol.org.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

A, Assembly of Screening Plates: a standard multiwell plate lid (a) has a silicone gasket with 48 hourglass-shaped holes (b) applied to its outer surface. The bottom half of each opening (c) is filled with solid growth medium, and a seed is pipetted into the neck. A sheet of cellophane (d) flattens and seals the screening wells while allowing gas exchange. The cellophane is replaced with a coverslip for imaging. Populated plates are stacked together, sealed with surgical tape, and then incubated in a vertical position for 7 d. To keep the seeds hydrated, a layer of agar is deposited on the inside of each plate before it is populated and stacked. B, Populated plates viewed from above. Gravitropism assures vertical orientation of seedlings, which are illuminated evenly from all sides. C, Seedling in single well. The squares indicate the standard 5 + 2 + 6 search pattern for automatically finding cotyledon, hypocotyl, and root, respectively. Scale bar = 3 mm. D, Plate in the climate controlled imaging chamber of the Pathway HT automated imager. All tissues are close enough to the cover glass to be imaged by the UApo/340UV 20×/0.75NA objective lens, which moves on linear motors below the sample. For more information on microscopy methods described above, visit http://www.cepceb.ucr.edu.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a mutagenized transgenic line expressing a tonoplast-localized protein fused to GFP, we were able to screen for vacuolar biogenesis mutants using confocal microscopy. Although we used EMS to mutagenize plants to generate point mutations, approximately 50% of the vacuolar mutants did not survive. Nevertheless, we were able to isolate four groups of mutants that would be useful in further analysis of vacuolar biogenesis. In our mutant screen, we found mutants that exhibit defective or modified vacuoles throughout the plant and mutants whose vacuolar phenotype is specific to a particular tissue of the plant. This suggests that the endomembrane system in shoots can be uncoupled from organization of the endomembrane system in roots and indicates that vacuolar biogenesis has tissue-specific components. It is also important to note that we never recovered a mutant seedling that completely lacked a large, central vacuole (Fig. 2, A–L). This result supports previous conclusions by Rojo et al. (2001) that the vacuole is an essential organelle to the plant cell. It is likely that an approach encompassing only transient disruptions of vacuolar biogenesis components, such as chemical genetics, will be beneficial to directly target many fundamental vacuolar biogenesis proteins.

Although the screen was originally performed using the Meridian Insight Point Confocal Microscope, a system has been developed that grows up to 48 seedlings on a multiwell plate lid, which can be imaged automatically. Although fully automating the process is at an early stage of development, it will eventually increase the scope of possible experiments, including chemical genetics screens to test for the effects of drugs on seedling germination and tissue development. One of the challenges will be to manage the large volume of data generated by automated screening. Similar screening approaches could offer an excellent opportunity to study the biogenesis of other plant organelles.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Chris R. Somerville for providing the 35S::GFP:δ-TIP transgenic seeds. We thank Drs. Glenn Hicks, Marci Surpin, and Clay Carter for valuable discussions and Ms. Jocelyn Brimo for image and manuscript preparation.

Footnotes

  • http://www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.103.033092.

  • 1 This work was supported by the Department of Energy (grant no. DE–FG03–02ER15295/A000 to N.V.R.) and by the National Science Foundation Graduate (Research Fellowship to E.E.A.).

  • 2 These authors contributed equally to the paper.

  • [w] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.

  • Received September 9, 2003.
  • Revised September 16, 2003.
  • Accepted September 16, 2003.
  • Published December 17, 2003.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Ahmed SU, Rojo E, Kovaleva V, Venkataraman S, Dombrowski JE, Matsuoka K, Raikhel NV (2000) The plant vacuolar sorting receptor AtELP is involved in transport of NH2-terminal propeptide-containing vacuolar proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Cell Biol 149: 1335-1344
  2. Cutler SR, Ehrhardt DW, Griffitts JS, Somerville CR (2000) Random GFP :: cDNA fusions enable visualizaiton of subcellular structures in cells of Arabidopsis at a high frequency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 3718-3723
  3. Horazdovsky B, Emr S (1993) The VPS16 gene product associates with a sedimentable protein complex and is essential for vacuolar protein sorting in yeast. J Biol Chem 268: 4953-4962
  4. Lightner J, Caspar T (1998) Seed mutagenesis of Arabidopsis. Methods Mol Biol 82: 91-103
  5. Lukowitz W, Mayer U, Jurgens G (1996) Cytokinesis in the Arabidopsis embryo involves the syntaxin-related KNOLLE gene product. Cell 84: 61-71
  6. Rojo E, Gillmor CS, Kovaleva V, Somerville CR, Raikhel NV (2001) VACUOLELESS1 is an essential gene required for vacuole formation and morphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell 1: 303-310
  7. Rojo E, Zouhar J, Kovaleva V, Hong S, Raikhel NV (2003) The AtC-VPS protein complex is localized to the tonoplast and the prevacuolar compartment in Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Cell 14: 361-369
  8. Sanderfoot AA, Pilgrim M, Adam L, Raikhel NV (2001) Disruption of individual members of Arabidopsis syntaxin gene families indicates each has essential functions. Plant Cell 13: 659-666
  9. Yano D, Sato M, Saito C, Sato MH, Morita MT, Tasaka M (2003) A SNARE complex containing SGR3/AtVAM3 and ZIG/VTI11 in gravity-sensing cells is important for Arabidopsis shoot gravitropism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 8589-8594
  10. Zhu J, Gong Z, Zhang C, Song C-P, Damsz B, Inan G, Koiwa H, Zhu J-K, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA (2002) OSM1/SYP61: a syntaxin protein in Arabidopsis controls abscisic acid-mediated and non-abscisic acid-mediated responses to abiotic stress. Plant Cell 14: 3009-3028

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Physiology Preview
  • Archive
  • Focus Collections
  • Classic Collections
  • The Plant Cell
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Journal Miles
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire